心理健康的临床决策支持系统:卫生专业人员经验的范围审查

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Fangziyun Tong, Reeva Lederman, Simon D’Alfonso
{"title":"心理健康的临床决策支持系统:卫生专业人员经验的范围审查","authors":"Fangziyun Tong,&nbsp;Reeva Lederman,&nbsp;Simon D’Alfonso","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical decision support systems in mental health: A scoping review of health professionals’ experiences\",\"authors\":\"Fangziyun Tong,&nbsp;Reeva Lederman,&nbsp;Simon D’Alfonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138650562500098X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138650562500098X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床决策支持系统(cdss)有可能帮助卫生专业人员在减少医疗差错的同时做出明智和具有成本效益的临床决策。然而,与身体健康相比,cdss在心理健康方面的研究较少。特别是,尽管心理健康专业人员是心理健康cdss的主要用户,但很少有研究探讨他们对这些系统的经验和/或观点。此外,我们不知道有任何专门针对这一主题的评论。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项范围综述,以从精神卫生专业人员的角度研究cdss的最新研究状况。方法按照PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and meta - analysis)指南,系统检索PubMed和PsycINFO两个数据库的相关文献。通过综合定性研究结果,我们确定了23篇文章,描述了20个cdss,确定了采用cdss的四个关键障碍和三个促进因素。虽然由于结果和方法的异质性,我们没有综合定量结果,但我们强调缺乏从精神卫生专业人员的角度评估cdss的有效定量方法。意义据我们所知,这是第一次对精神卫生专业人员对cdss的经验和观点进行审查。我们确定了采用cdss的促进因素和障碍,并强调需要标准化研究方法来评估心理健康领域的cdss。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical decision support systems in mental health: A scoping review of health professionals’ experiences

Background

Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.

Method

In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.

Findings

We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.

Significance

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Medical Informatics
International Journal of Medical Informatics 医学-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.10%
发文量
217
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings. The scope of journal covers: Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.; Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc. Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general; Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信