{"title":"心理健康的临床决策支持系统:卫生专业人员经验的范围审查","authors":"Fangziyun Tong, Reeva Lederman, Simon D’Alfonso","doi":"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54950,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","volume":"199 ","pages":"Article 105881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical decision support systems in mental health: A scoping review of health professionals’ experiences\",\"authors\":\"Fangziyun Tong, Reeva Lederman, Simon D’Alfonso\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.105881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.</div></div><div><h3>Significance</h3><div>To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"199 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138650562500098X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S138650562500098X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
临床决策支持系统(cdss)有可能帮助卫生专业人员在减少医疗差错的同时做出明智和具有成本效益的临床决策。然而,与身体健康相比,cdss在心理健康方面的研究较少。特别是,尽管心理健康专业人员是心理健康cdss的主要用户,但很少有研究探讨他们对这些系统的经验和/或观点。此外,我们不知道有任何专门针对这一主题的评论。为了解决这一差距,我们进行了一项范围综述,以从精神卫生专业人员的角度研究cdss的最新研究状况。方法按照PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and meta - analysis)指南,系统检索PubMed和PsycINFO两个数据库的相关文献。通过综合定性研究结果,我们确定了23篇文章,描述了20个cdss,确定了采用cdss的四个关键障碍和三个促进因素。虽然由于结果和方法的异质性,我们没有综合定量结果,但我们强调缺乏从精神卫生专业人员的角度评估cdss的有效定量方法。意义据我们所知,这是第一次对精神卫生专业人员对cdss的经验和观点进行审查。我们确定了采用cdss的促进因素和障碍,并强调需要标准化研究方法来评估心理健康领域的cdss。
Clinical decision support systems in mental health: A scoping review of health professionals’ experiences
Background
Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) have the potential to assist health professionals in making informed and cost-effective clinical decisions while reducing medical errors. However, compared to physical health, CDSSs have been less investigated within the mental health context. In particular, despite mental health professionals being the primary users of mental health CDSSs, few studies have explored their experiences and/or views on these systems. Furthermore, we are not aware of any reviews specifically focusing on this topic. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to map the state of the art in studies examining CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.
Method
In this review, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, we systematically searched the relevant literature in two databases, PubMed and PsycINFO.
Findings
We identified 23 articles describing 20 CDSSs Through the synthesis of qualitative findings, four key barriers and three facilitators to the adoption of CDSSs were identified. Although we did not synthesize quantitative findings due to the heterogeneity of the results and methodologies, we emphasize the issue of a lack of valid quantitative methods for evaluating CDSSs from the perspectives of mental health professionals.
Significance
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review examining mental health professionals’ experiences and views on CDSSs. We identified facilitators and barriers to adopting CDSSs and highlighted the need for standardizing research methods to evaluate CDSSs in the mental health space.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Medical Informatics provides an international medium for dissemination of original results and interpretative reviews concerning the field of medical informatics. The Journal emphasizes the evaluation of systems in healthcare settings.
The scope of journal covers:
Information systems, including national or international registration systems, hospital information systems, departmental and/or physician''s office systems, document handling systems, electronic medical record systems, standardization, systems integration etc.;
Computer-aided medical decision support systems using heuristic, algorithmic and/or statistical methods as exemplified in decision theory, protocol development, artificial intelligence, etc.
Educational computer based programs pertaining to medical informatics or medicine in general;
Organizational, economic, social, clinical impact, ethical and cost-benefit aspects of IT applications in health care.