数字化温室试验:一种利用深度学习高效客观评估植物损害的自动化方法

IF 8.2 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Laura Gómez-Zamanillo , Arantza Bereciartúa-Pérez , Artzai Picón , Liliana Parra , Marian Oldenbuerger , Ramón Navarra-Mestre , Christian Klukas , Till Eggers , Jone Echazarra
{"title":"数字化温室试验:一种利用深度学习高效客观评估植物损害的自动化方法","authors":"Laura Gómez-Zamanillo ,&nbsp;Arantza Bereciartúa-Pérez ,&nbsp;Artzai Picón ,&nbsp;Liliana Parra ,&nbsp;Marian Oldenbuerger ,&nbsp;Ramón Navarra-Mestre ,&nbsp;Christian Klukas ,&nbsp;Till Eggers ,&nbsp;Jone Echazarra","doi":"10.1016/j.aiia.2025.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The use of image based and, recently, deep learning-based systems have provided good results in several applications. Greenhouse trials are key part in the process of developing and testing new herbicides and analyze the response of the species to different products and doses in a controlled way. The assessment of the damage in the plant is daily done in all trials by visual evaluation by experts. This entails time consuming process and lack of repeatability. Greenhouse trials require new digital tools to reduce time consuming process and to endow the experts with more objective and repetitive methods for establishing the damage in the plants.</div><div>To this end, a novel method is proposed composed by an initial segmentation of the plant species followed by a multibranch convolutional neural network to estimate the damage level. In this way, we overcome the need for costly and unaffordable pixelwise manual segmentation for damage symptoms and we make use of global damage estimation values provided by the experts.</div><div>The algorithm has been deployed under real greenhouse trials conditions in a pilot study located in BASF in Germany and tested over four species (GLXMA, TRZAW, ECHCG, AMARE). The results show mean average error (MAE) values ranging from 5.20 for AMARE and 8.07 for ECHCG for the estimation of PDCU value, with correlation values (R<sup>2</sup>) higher than 0.85 in all situations, and up to 0.92 in AMARE. These results surpass the inter-rater variability of human experts demonstrating that the proposed automated method is appropriate for automatically assessing greenhouse damage trials.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52814,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 280-295"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digitalizing greenhouse trials: An automated approach for efficient and objective assessment of plant damage using deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Laura Gómez-Zamanillo ,&nbsp;Arantza Bereciartúa-Pérez ,&nbsp;Artzai Picón ,&nbsp;Liliana Parra ,&nbsp;Marian Oldenbuerger ,&nbsp;Ramón Navarra-Mestre ,&nbsp;Christian Klukas ,&nbsp;Till Eggers ,&nbsp;Jone Echazarra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aiia.2025.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The use of image based and, recently, deep learning-based systems have provided good results in several applications. Greenhouse trials are key part in the process of developing and testing new herbicides and analyze the response of the species to different products and doses in a controlled way. The assessment of the damage in the plant is daily done in all trials by visual evaluation by experts. This entails time consuming process and lack of repeatability. Greenhouse trials require new digital tools to reduce time consuming process and to endow the experts with more objective and repetitive methods for establishing the damage in the plants.</div><div>To this end, a novel method is proposed composed by an initial segmentation of the plant species followed by a multibranch convolutional neural network to estimate the damage level. In this way, we overcome the need for costly and unaffordable pixelwise manual segmentation for damage symptoms and we make use of global damage estimation values provided by the experts.</div><div>The algorithm has been deployed under real greenhouse trials conditions in a pilot study located in BASF in Germany and tested over four species (GLXMA, TRZAW, ECHCG, AMARE). The results show mean average error (MAE) values ranging from 5.20 for AMARE and 8.07 for ECHCG for the estimation of PDCU value, with correlation values (R<sup>2</sup>) higher than 0.85 in all situations, and up to 0.92 in AMARE. These results surpass the inter-rater variability of human experts demonstrating that the proposed automated method is appropriate for automatically assessing greenhouse damage trials.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 280-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721725000285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589721725000285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于图像和最近基于深度学习的系统的使用在几个应用中提供了良好的结果。温室试验是新型除草剂开发和试验的关键环节,是对除草剂品种对不同产品和剂量的反应进行控制分析的重要环节。在所有试验中,每天都由专家通过目视评估对工厂的损害进行评估。这需要耗时的过程和缺乏可重复性。温室试验需要新的数字工具来减少耗时的过程,并赋予专家更客观和重复的方法来确定植物的损害。为此,提出了一种基于多分支卷积神经网络对植物物种进行初始分割的损伤程度估计方法。通过这种方式,我们克服了对损伤症状进行昂贵且难以负担的像素级人工分割的需要,并且我们利用了专家提供的全局损伤估计值。该算法已在德国巴斯夫的一项试点研究中部署在真实的温室试验条件下,并对四种物种(GLXMA, TRZAW, ECHCG, AMARE)进行了测试。结果表明,AMARE估计PDCU值的平均误差(MAE)为5.20,ECHCG估计PDCU值的平均误差为8.07,相关系数(R2)均大于0.85,而AMARE估计PDCU值的相关系数(R2)最高可达0.92。这些结果超过了人类专家的内部变异性,表明所提出的自动化方法适用于自动评估温室损害试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digitalizing greenhouse trials: An automated approach for efficient and objective assessment of plant damage using deep learning
The use of image based and, recently, deep learning-based systems have provided good results in several applications. Greenhouse trials are key part in the process of developing and testing new herbicides and analyze the response of the species to different products and doses in a controlled way. The assessment of the damage in the plant is daily done in all trials by visual evaluation by experts. This entails time consuming process and lack of repeatability. Greenhouse trials require new digital tools to reduce time consuming process and to endow the experts with more objective and repetitive methods for establishing the damage in the plants.
To this end, a novel method is proposed composed by an initial segmentation of the plant species followed by a multibranch convolutional neural network to estimate the damage level. In this way, we overcome the need for costly and unaffordable pixelwise manual segmentation for damage symptoms and we make use of global damage estimation values provided by the experts.
The algorithm has been deployed under real greenhouse trials conditions in a pilot study located in BASF in Germany and tested over four species (GLXMA, TRZAW, ECHCG, AMARE). The results show mean average error (MAE) values ranging from 5.20 for AMARE and 8.07 for ECHCG for the estimation of PDCU value, with correlation values (R2) higher than 0.85 in all situations, and up to 0.92 in AMARE. These results surpass the inter-rater variability of human experts demonstrating that the proposed automated method is appropriate for automatically assessing greenhouse damage trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture
Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture Engineering-Engineering (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
21.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信