物理和康复医学领域的标准化操作程序建议

IF 4.6 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Christelle Nguyen , Maxence Compagnat , Jonathan Lévy , Isabelle Bonan , François Constant Boyer , Mickaël Dinomais , François Genêt , François Rannou , Patricia Ribinik , Dominic Pérennou , Arnaud Dupeyron
{"title":"物理和康复医学领域的标准化操作程序建议","authors":"Christelle Nguyen ,&nbsp;Maxence Compagnat ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lévy ,&nbsp;Isabelle Bonan ,&nbsp;François Constant Boyer ,&nbsp;Mickaël Dinomais ,&nbsp;François Genêt ,&nbsp;François Rannou ,&nbsp;Patricia Ribinik ,&nbsp;Dominic Pérennou ,&nbsp;Arnaud Dupeyron","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2025.101951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is an outstanding increased demand for recommendations in the rehabilitation field. Over 600 recommendation articles have been published in the last decade, primarily by groups of authors based on unclear criteria and only a few by learned societies based on standardized methods.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In 2007, the French Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SOFMER) published a methodology to establish recommendations in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). This framework, which served to publish 22 sets of management recommendations, must be reworked to meet new international methods for elaborating recommendations. Therefore, our objectives were: 1) to elaborate an updated methodology to enhance the dissemination and implementation of SOFMER-endorsed recommendations, and 2) to standardize and report in sufficient detail the successive steps from the elaboration of these recommendations to the evaluation of their impact and provide supporting tools to guide developers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>At the SOFMER's request, a steering committee assembled, consisting of 7 PRM senior physicians with experience in elaborating, disseminating, implementing and/or evaluating recommendations in the field of PRM. They conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify methodologies and standardized operating procedures previously published by scientific societies in France and overseas. Available information regarding strategies for elaboration, dissemination, implementation and evaluation of the recommendations, scientific valorization and business models was retrieved. Participants in previous recommendations were also interviewed regardless of their field.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 4 common key steps: preparation, elaboration, valorization and evaluation, usually scheduled according to an 18- to 24-month timetable. We divided these 4 steps into 9 sub-steps, each of which was standardized and described in detail. The steering committee also elaborated a specific editorial process for publishing recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This novel SOFMER methodology was designed to draw up high-level recommendations for the field of PRM and, more generally, for rehabilitation practices, facilitating their implementation. Standardization of operating procedures should provide guidance to authors to achieve replicable and high-quality recommendations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"68 3","pages":"Article 101951"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standardised operating procedures for recommendations in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine\",\"authors\":\"Christelle Nguyen ,&nbsp;Maxence Compagnat ,&nbsp;Jonathan Lévy ,&nbsp;Isabelle Bonan ,&nbsp;François Constant Boyer ,&nbsp;Mickaël Dinomais ,&nbsp;François Genêt ,&nbsp;François Rannou ,&nbsp;Patricia Ribinik ,&nbsp;Dominic Pérennou ,&nbsp;Arnaud Dupeyron\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rehab.2025.101951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is an outstanding increased demand for recommendations in the rehabilitation field. Over 600 recommendation articles have been published in the last decade, primarily by groups of authors based on unclear criteria and only a few by learned societies based on standardized methods.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In 2007, the French Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SOFMER) published a methodology to establish recommendations in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). This framework, which served to publish 22 sets of management recommendations, must be reworked to meet new international methods for elaborating recommendations. Therefore, our objectives were: 1) to elaborate an updated methodology to enhance the dissemination and implementation of SOFMER-endorsed recommendations, and 2) to standardize and report in sufficient detail the successive steps from the elaboration of these recommendations to the evaluation of their impact and provide supporting tools to guide developers.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>At the SOFMER's request, a steering committee assembled, consisting of 7 PRM senior physicians with experience in elaborating, disseminating, implementing and/or evaluating recommendations in the field of PRM. They conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify methodologies and standardized operating procedures previously published by scientific societies in France and overseas. Available information regarding strategies for elaboration, dissemination, implementation and evaluation of the recommendations, scientific valorization and business models was retrieved. Participants in previous recommendations were also interviewed regardless of their field.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 4 common key steps: preparation, elaboration, valorization and evaluation, usually scheduled according to an 18- to 24-month timetable. We divided these 4 steps into 9 sub-steps, each of which was standardized and described in detail. The steering committee also elaborated a specific editorial process for publishing recommendations.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This novel SOFMER methodology was designed to draw up high-level recommendations for the field of PRM and, more generally, for rehabilitation practices, facilitating their implementation. Standardization of operating procedures should provide guidance to authors to achieve replicable and high-quality recommendations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56030,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"volume\":\"68 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101951\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065725000168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065725000168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:康复领域对建议的需求显著增加。在过去十年中,已经发表了600多篇推荐文章,主要是由基于不明确标准的作者团体发表的,只有少数是基于标准化方法的学术团体发表的。目的2007年,法国物理和康复医学学会(SOFMER)发表了一种建立物理和康复医学(PRM)建议的方法。这一框架用于发表22套管理建议,必须加以修改,以符合拟订建议的新的国际方法。因此,我们的目标是:1)阐述一种更新的方法,以加强sofmer认可的建议的传播和实施;2)标准化并充分详细地报告从这些建议的阐述到评估其影响的连续步骤,并提供支持工具来指导开发人员。方法根据SOFMER的要求,成立了一个指导委员会,由7名在制定、传播、实施和/或评估PRM领域建议方面具有经验的PRM资深医生组成。他们进行了一项非系统的文献综述,以确定法国和海外科学协会先前发表的方法和标准化操作程序。检索了关于拟订、传播、执行和评价建议的战略、科学评价和商业模式的现有资料。之前推荐的参与者也接受了面试,无论他们的专业是什么。结果我们确定了4个常见的关键步骤:准备、阐述、评估和评估,通常按照18至24个月的时间表进行安排。我们将这4个步骤分为9个子步骤,每个步骤都进行了标准化和详细描述。指导委员会还制定了出版建议的具体编辑程序。这种新颖的SOFMER方法旨在为PRM领域,更广泛地说,为康复实践制定高水平的建议,并促进其实施。操作程序的标准化应该为作者提供指导,以实现可复制和高质量的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Standardised operating procedures for recommendations in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine

Background

There is an outstanding increased demand for recommendations in the rehabilitation field. Over 600 recommendation articles have been published in the last decade, primarily by groups of authors based on unclear criteria and only a few by learned societies based on standardized methods.

Objectives

In 2007, the French Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SOFMER) published a methodology to establish recommendations in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). This framework, which served to publish 22 sets of management recommendations, must be reworked to meet new international methods for elaborating recommendations. Therefore, our objectives were: 1) to elaborate an updated methodology to enhance the dissemination and implementation of SOFMER-endorsed recommendations, and 2) to standardize and report in sufficient detail the successive steps from the elaboration of these recommendations to the evaluation of their impact and provide supporting tools to guide developers.

Methods

At the SOFMER's request, a steering committee assembled, consisting of 7 PRM senior physicians with experience in elaborating, disseminating, implementing and/or evaluating recommendations in the field of PRM. They conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify methodologies and standardized operating procedures previously published by scientific societies in France and overseas. Available information regarding strategies for elaboration, dissemination, implementation and evaluation of the recommendations, scientific valorization and business models was retrieved. Participants in previous recommendations were also interviewed regardless of their field.

Results

We identified 4 common key steps: preparation, elaboration, valorization and evaluation, usually scheduled according to an 18- to 24-month timetable. We divided these 4 steps into 9 sub-steps, each of which was standardized and described in detail. The steering committee also elaborated a specific editorial process for publishing recommendations.

Conclusions

This novel SOFMER methodology was designed to draw up high-level recommendations for the field of PRM and, more generally, for rehabilitation practices, facilitating their implementation. Standardization of operating procedures should provide guidance to authors to achieve replicable and high-quality recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信