经直肠前列腺活检单剂量磷霉素与长期抗生素预防:一项单中心前瞻性、随机对照试验

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ádám M. Fehér , Zoltán Bajory , Nándor Czimbalmos , Katalin Burián , Andrea Lázár , Ferenc Rárosi , Béla Köves
{"title":"经直肠前列腺活检单剂量磷霉素与长期抗生素预防:一项单中心前瞻性、随机对照试验","authors":"Ádám M. Fehér ,&nbsp;Zoltán Bajory ,&nbsp;Nándor Czimbalmos ,&nbsp;Katalin Burián ,&nbsp;Andrea Lázár ,&nbsp;Ferenc Rárosi ,&nbsp;Béla Köves","doi":"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transrectal prostate biopsy is a commonly performed urological procedure in which antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Fluoroquinolone-type antibiotics are no longer acceptable in the EU. Fosfomycin-trometamol may be used, but there is no evidence regarding its ideal dose and administration time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2021 and 2023 were evaluated prospectively. 204 patients were randomized into two arms: 102 patients (Arm A) received a single-dose of fosfomycin-trometamol one hour before surgery, and 102 patients (Arm B) received one additional dose of fosfomycin-trometamol 48 hours after the first dose. Urine tests and questionnaires were administered during the postoperative period and the subsequent four weeks to identify any symptoms, infectious, or other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no statistical difference in the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (4.90% (5) vs. 8.82% (9), <em>P</em> = 0.27) symptomatic urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 1.96% (2), <em>P</em> = 0.50), or febrile urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 0.98% (1), <em>P</em> = 1) between the groups. Only hematuria was significantly more common in Arm B (6.86% (7) vs. 16.67% (17), <em>P</em> = 0.03), whereas other complications did not differ significantly. There was no statistical difference in hospitalization (0.98% (1) vs. 2.94 (3), <em>P</em> = 0.62) or mortality rate (0 % (0) vs. 0.98% (1), <em>P</em> = 1). Sub-group analysis of previous antibiotic users showed no difference in terms of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is no significant difference in infectious complications between single-dose and prolonged prophylaxis of fosfomycin-trometamol for transrectal prostate biopsy. A single-dose of fosfomycin one hour before biopsy is an ideal choice with a better ecological impact compared with prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20845,"journal":{"name":"Prostate International","volume":"13 1","pages":"Pages 28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-dose vs prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis of fosfomycin for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Ádám M. Fehér ,&nbsp;Zoltán Bajory ,&nbsp;Nándor Czimbalmos ,&nbsp;Katalin Burián ,&nbsp;Andrea Lázár ,&nbsp;Ferenc Rárosi ,&nbsp;Béla Köves\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prnil.2024.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Transrectal prostate biopsy is a commonly performed urological procedure in which antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Fluoroquinolone-type antibiotics are no longer acceptable in the EU. Fosfomycin-trometamol may be used, but there is no evidence regarding its ideal dose and administration time.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2021 and 2023 were evaluated prospectively. 204 patients were randomized into two arms: 102 patients (Arm A) received a single-dose of fosfomycin-trometamol one hour before surgery, and 102 patients (Arm B) received one additional dose of fosfomycin-trometamol 48 hours after the first dose. Urine tests and questionnaires were administered during the postoperative period and the subsequent four weeks to identify any symptoms, infectious, or other complications.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was no statistical difference in the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (4.90% (5) vs. 8.82% (9), <em>P</em> = 0.27) symptomatic urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 1.96% (2), <em>P</em> = 0.50), or febrile urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 0.98% (1), <em>P</em> = 1) between the groups. Only hematuria was significantly more common in Arm B (6.86% (7) vs. 16.67% (17), <em>P</em> = 0.03), whereas other complications did not differ significantly. There was no statistical difference in hospitalization (0.98% (1) vs. 2.94 (3), <em>P</em> = 0.62) or mortality rate (0 % (0) vs. 0.98% (1), <em>P</em> = 1). Sub-group analysis of previous antibiotic users showed no difference in terms of complications.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is no significant difference in infectious complications between single-dose and prolonged prophylaxis of fosfomycin-trometamol for transrectal prostate biopsy. A single-dose of fosfomycin one hour before biopsy is an ideal choice with a better ecological impact compared with prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prostate International\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 28-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prostate International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000825\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2287888224000825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经直肠前列腺活检是一种常用的泌尿外科手术,建议使用抗生素预防。氟喹诺酮类抗生素在欧盟已不再被接受。可以使用磷霉素-曲美他醇,但没有关于其理想剂量和给药时间的证据。方法前瞻性评估2021 - 2023年间接受前列腺活检的患者。204例患者被随机分为两组:102例患者(A组)在手术前1小时接受单剂量磷霉素-曲美他醇治疗,102例患者(B组)在手术前48小时后接受一剂量磷霉素-曲美他醇治疗。在术后和随后的四周内进行尿检和问卷调查,以确定任何症状、感染或其他并发症。结果两组无症状菌尿发生率(4.90%(5)比8.82% (9),P = 0.27)、有症状尿路感染发生率(0%(0)比1.96% (2),P = 0.50)、发热性尿路感染发生率(0%(0)比0.98% (1),P = 1)差异无统计学意义。只有血尿在B组更为常见(6.86%(7)比16.67% (17),P = 0.03),而其他并发症无显著差异。住院率(0.98%(1)比2.94 (3),P = 0.62)和死亡率(0%(0)比0.98% (1),P = 1)无统计学差异。既往抗生素使用亚组分析显示并发症无统计学差异。结论经直肠前列腺活检单剂量预防与长期预防磷霉素-曲美他醇感染并发症无显著性差异。活检前1小时单剂量磷霉素是理想的选择,与经直肠前列腺活检的长期抗生素预防相比,具有更好的生态影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-dose vs prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis of fosfomycin for transrectal prostate biopsy: a single-center prospective, randomized, controlled trial

Background

Transrectal prostate biopsy is a commonly performed urological procedure in which antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. Fluoroquinolone-type antibiotics are no longer acceptable in the EU. Fosfomycin-trometamol may be used, but there is no evidence regarding its ideal dose and administration time.

Methods

Patients who underwent prostate biopsy between 2021 and 2023 were evaluated prospectively. 204 patients were randomized into two arms: 102 patients (Arm A) received a single-dose of fosfomycin-trometamol one hour before surgery, and 102 patients (Arm B) received one additional dose of fosfomycin-trometamol 48 hours after the first dose. Urine tests and questionnaires were administered during the postoperative period and the subsequent four weeks to identify any symptoms, infectious, or other complications.

Results

There was no statistical difference in the rate of asymptomatic bacteriuria (4.90% (5) vs. 8.82% (9), P = 0.27) symptomatic urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 1.96% (2), P = 0.50), or febrile urinary tract infection (0% (0) vs. 0.98% (1), P = 1) between the groups. Only hematuria was significantly more common in Arm B (6.86% (7) vs. 16.67% (17), P = 0.03), whereas other complications did not differ significantly. There was no statistical difference in hospitalization (0.98% (1) vs. 2.94 (3), P = 0.62) or mortality rate (0 % (0) vs. 0.98% (1), P = 1). Sub-group analysis of previous antibiotic users showed no difference in terms of complications.

Conclusion

There is no significant difference in infectious complications between single-dose and prolonged prophylaxis of fosfomycin-trometamol for transrectal prostate biopsy. A single-dose of fosfomycin one hour before biopsy is an ideal choice with a better ecological impact compared with prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate International
Prostate International Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
26.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Prostate International (Prostate Int, PI), the official English-language journal of Asian Pacific Prostate Society (APPS), is an international peer-reviewed academic journal dedicated to basic and clinical studies on prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, prostatitis, and ...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信