保留乳头乳房切除术三种不同切口疤痕眼动追踪及注视模式差异对乳房重建术后即刻美学影响的研究

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Zexiong Cheng , Zhechen Zhu , Wei Yan , Chi Zhang , Jingping Shi
{"title":"保留乳头乳房切除术三种不同切口疤痕眼动追踪及注视模式差异对乳房重建术后即刻美学影响的研究","authors":"Zexiong Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhechen Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Yan ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingping Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.02.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The prevalence of breast cancer has been increasing globally, with a notable impact on women’s health. To address the aesthetic outcomes of different surgical incision scars following nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer, this study employed eye-tracking technology for the objective recording of observation patterns. The impact of 3 distinct scar types (transverse, discontinuous, and contiguous) on breast-viewing behavior was analyzed in total. The researchers requested that participants view images of breasts with these scars and subsequently rate the visibility of the scars on a visual analog scale. The results were then collected and analyzed. The findings indicated that contiguous scars were observed for the longest duration and were perceived as the most obvious. They were considered the least aesthetically pleasing, likely due to their proximity to and partial intersection with the nipple-areola complex (NAC). In contrast, discontinuous scars were associated with shorter gaze durations and were considered more aesthetically pleasing. These findings indicate that the selection of surgical incisions is of significant importance with regard to postoperative breast aesthetics. Furthermore, they suggest that the avoidance of the NAC area may facilitate superior aesthetic outcomes. Moreover, the present study did not find a significant effect of breast size and gender on the assessment of postoperative aesthetic outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"104 ","pages":"Pages 124-131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A study of differences in eye tracking and gaze patterns of three different surgical incision scars for nipple-sparing mastectomy on immediate postoperative aesthetics of breast reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Zexiong Cheng ,&nbsp;Zhechen Zhu ,&nbsp;Wei Yan ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang ,&nbsp;Jingping Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2025.02.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The prevalence of breast cancer has been increasing globally, with a notable impact on women’s health. To address the aesthetic outcomes of different surgical incision scars following nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer, this study employed eye-tracking technology for the objective recording of observation patterns. The impact of 3 distinct scar types (transverse, discontinuous, and contiguous) on breast-viewing behavior was analyzed in total. The researchers requested that participants view images of breasts with these scars and subsequently rate the visibility of the scars on a visual analog scale. The results were then collected and analyzed. The findings indicated that contiguous scars were observed for the longest duration and were perceived as the most obvious. They were considered the least aesthetically pleasing, likely due to their proximity to and partial intersection with the nipple-areola complex (NAC). In contrast, discontinuous scars were associated with shorter gaze durations and were considered more aesthetically pleasing. These findings indicate that the selection of surgical incisions is of significant importance with regard to postoperative breast aesthetics. Furthermore, they suggest that the avoidance of the NAC area may facilitate superior aesthetic outcomes. Moreover, the present study did not find a significant effect of breast size and gender on the assessment of postoperative aesthetic outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"104 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 124-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525001408\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681525001408","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,乳腺癌的发病率一直在上升,对妇女的健康产生了显著影响。为了探讨保留乳头乳房切除术后不同手术切口疤痕的美学效果,本研究采用眼动追踪技术对观察模式进行客观记录。分析3种不同疤痕类型(横型、不连续型和连续型)对观乳行为的影响。研究人员要求参与者观看带有这些疤痕的乳房图像,然后在视觉模拟量表上对疤痕的可见性进行评分。然后收集和分析结果。结果表明,连续疤痕的观察时间最长,并且被认为是最明显的。它们被认为是最不美观的,可能是因为它们靠近乳头-乳晕复合体(NAC)并与之部分相交。相反,不连续疤痕与较短的注视时间有关,并且被认为更美观。这些结果表明,手术切口的选择对术后乳房美观具有重要意义。此外,他们认为避开NAC区域可能会促进更好的美学效果。此外,本研究未发现乳房大小和性别对术后美学结果的评估有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A study of differences in eye tracking and gaze patterns of three different surgical incision scars for nipple-sparing mastectomy on immediate postoperative aesthetics of breast reconstruction
The prevalence of breast cancer has been increasing globally, with a notable impact on women’s health. To address the aesthetic outcomes of different surgical incision scars following nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer, this study employed eye-tracking technology for the objective recording of observation patterns. The impact of 3 distinct scar types (transverse, discontinuous, and contiguous) on breast-viewing behavior was analyzed in total. The researchers requested that participants view images of breasts with these scars and subsequently rate the visibility of the scars on a visual analog scale. The results were then collected and analyzed. The findings indicated that contiguous scars were observed for the longest duration and were perceived as the most obvious. They were considered the least aesthetically pleasing, likely due to their proximity to and partial intersection with the nipple-areola complex (NAC). In contrast, discontinuous scars were associated with shorter gaze durations and were considered more aesthetically pleasing. These findings indicate that the selection of surgical incisions is of significant importance with regard to postoperative breast aesthetics. Furthermore, they suggest that the avoidance of the NAC area may facilitate superior aesthetic outcomes. Moreover, the present study did not find a significant effect of breast size and gender on the assessment of postoperative aesthetic outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信