风湿性多肌痛和巨细胞动脉炎患者主动脉瘤、夹层或破裂的发生率

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Kylie Carlson , Mahmut Kaymakci , Sebastian E. Sattui , Michael Putman
{"title":"风湿性多肌痛和巨细胞动脉炎患者主动脉瘤、夹层或破裂的发生率","authors":"Kylie Carlson ,&nbsp;Mahmut Kaymakci ,&nbsp;Sebastian E. Sattui ,&nbsp;Michael Putman","doi":"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) may have subclinical large vessel vasculitis. We compared the incidence of aortic complications in PMR and giant cell arteritis (GCA) to the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients with PMR and GCA identified by ≥2 ICD-9/ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes and concurrent corticosteroid treatment in the US-based TriNetX database (2000–2024). Matched general population controls were identified (1:3 ratio). The primary outcome, aortic complications, was a composite of aortic aneurysm and dissection/rupture. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were calculated using Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models with PMR as the referent category.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 57,336 patients, 17,327 had PMR, 4,734 had GCA, and 35,275 were matched controls. Median follow-up time was 3.74 years (interquartile range, 1.8–6.4). The incidence rate of any aortic complication per 1,000 person-years was highest for GCA (11.69), followed by PMR (6.78) and the general population (5.09). Compared to patients with PMR, patients with GCA had a higher risk of any aortic complication (aHR 1.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.58–2.21); the general population risk was similar (aHR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.84–1.06). In a sensitivity analysis, patients with PMR who later developed GCA had a risk similar to those initially diagnosed with GCA (aHR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.60–1.19).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Patients with PMR had a similar risk of large vessel complications compared to the general population and a lower risk compared to those with GCA. These results do not support screening for aortic inflammation among patients with PMR who lack features of GCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21715,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 152714"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of aortic aneurysm, dissection, or rupture among patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis\",\"authors\":\"Kylie Carlson ,&nbsp;Mahmut Kaymakci ,&nbsp;Sebastian E. Sattui ,&nbsp;Michael Putman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semarthrit.2025.152714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) may have subclinical large vessel vasculitis. We compared the incidence of aortic complications in PMR and giant cell arteritis (GCA) to the general population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients with PMR and GCA identified by ≥2 ICD-9/ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes and concurrent corticosteroid treatment in the US-based TriNetX database (2000–2024). Matched general population controls were identified (1:3 ratio). The primary outcome, aortic complications, was a composite of aortic aneurysm and dissection/rupture. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were calculated using Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models with PMR as the referent category.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Of 57,336 patients, 17,327 had PMR, 4,734 had GCA, and 35,275 were matched controls. Median follow-up time was 3.74 years (interquartile range, 1.8–6.4). The incidence rate of any aortic complication per 1,000 person-years was highest for GCA (11.69), followed by PMR (6.78) and the general population (5.09). Compared to patients with PMR, patients with GCA had a higher risk of any aortic complication (aHR 1.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.58–2.21); the general population risk was similar (aHR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.84–1.06). In a sensitivity analysis, patients with PMR who later developed GCA had a risk similar to those initially diagnosed with GCA (aHR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.60–1.19).</div></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><div>Patients with PMR had a similar risk of large vessel complications compared to the general population and a lower risk compared to those with GCA. These results do not support screening for aortic inflammation among patients with PMR who lack features of GCA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"volume\":\"72 \",\"pages\":\"Article 152714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004901722500085X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004901722500085X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

多肌痛风湿病(PMR)患者可能有亚临床大血管炎。我们比较了PMR和巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)与普通人群的主动脉并发症发生率。方法回顾性队列研究在美国TriNetX数据库(2000-2024)中,通过≥2个ICD-9/ICD-10-CM诊断代码并同时接受皮质类固醇治疗的PMR和GCA患者。确定匹配的一般人群对照(1:3比例)。主要结局,主动脉并发症,是主动脉瘤和夹层/破裂的复合。校正风险比(aHR)采用Cox比例病因特异性风险模型计算,PMR为参考类别。结果:在57,336例患者中,17,327例为PMR, 4,734例为GCA, 35,275例为匹配对照。中位随访时间为3.74年(四分位数间距1.8-6.4)。主动脉并发症的发生率最高的是GCA(11.69),其次是PMR(6.78)和普通人群(5.09)。与PMR患者相比,GCA患者出现主动脉并发症的风险更高(aHR 1.87, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.58-2.21);一般人群风险相似(aHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06)。在敏感性分析中,PMR患者后来发展为GCA的风险与最初诊断为GCA的患者相似(aHR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60-1.19)。与一般人群相比,PMR患者发生大血管并发症的风险相似,与GCA患者相比风险较低。这些结果不支持在缺乏GCA特征的PMR患者中筛查主动脉炎症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of aortic aneurysm, dissection, or rupture among patients with polymyalgia rheumatica and giant cell arteritis

Background

Patients with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) may have subclinical large vessel vasculitis. We compared the incidence of aortic complications in PMR and giant cell arteritis (GCA) to the general population.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients with PMR and GCA identified by ≥2 ICD-9/ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes and concurrent corticosteroid treatment in the US-based TriNetX database (2000–2024). Matched general population controls were identified (1:3 ratio). The primary outcome, aortic complications, was a composite of aortic aneurysm and dissection/rupture. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were calculated using Cox proportional cause-specific hazard models with PMR as the referent category.

Findings

Of 57,336 patients, 17,327 had PMR, 4,734 had GCA, and 35,275 were matched controls. Median follow-up time was 3.74 years (interquartile range, 1.8–6.4). The incidence rate of any aortic complication per 1,000 person-years was highest for GCA (11.69), followed by PMR (6.78) and the general population (5.09). Compared to patients with PMR, patients with GCA had a higher risk of any aortic complication (aHR 1.87, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.58–2.21); the general population risk was similar (aHR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.84–1.06). In a sensitivity analysis, patients with PMR who later developed GCA had a risk similar to those initially diagnosed with GCA (aHR 0.85, 95 % CI 0.60–1.19).

Interpretation

Patients with PMR had a similar risk of large vessel complications compared to the general population and a lower risk compared to those with GCA. These results do not support screening for aortic inflammation among patients with PMR who lack features of GCA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism provides access to the highest-quality clinical, therapeutic and translational research about arthritis, rheumatology and musculoskeletal disorders that affect the joints and connective tissue. Each bimonthly issue includes articles giving you the latest diagnostic criteria, consensus statements, systematic reviews and meta-analyses as well as clinical and translational research studies. Read this journal for the latest groundbreaking research and to gain insights from scientists and clinicians on the management and treatment of musculoskeletal and autoimmune rheumatologic diseases. The journal is of interest to rheumatologists, orthopedic surgeons, internal medicine physicians, immunologists and specialists in bone and mineral metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信