解锁非常规路径:当智慧退居二线时,创造力如何导致不道德的选择

Jinpei Wu , Yiru Wang , Yilong Zheng , Chi Zhang
{"title":"解锁非常规路径:当智慧退居二线时,创造力如何导致不道德的选择","authors":"Jinpei Wu ,&nbsp;Yiru Wang ,&nbsp;Yilong Zheng ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing research highlighted that creativity could yield both beneficial and detrimental outcomes. With the growing interest in the darker aspects of creativity, this study reviewed literature on both the positive and negative effects of creativity and proposed that the relationship between creativity and unethical decision-making was moderated by wisdom. Drawing on data from 266 individuals in the U.S. (via <span><span>www.mturk.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and 303 individuals in China (via wjx.cn), the study employed two of Kaptein's five-factor unethical behavior scenarios to assess unethical decision-making. Wisdom was measured using the 3-D Wisdom Scale developed by Ardelt, while creativity was assessed through a revised measure based on Runco's 4Ps framework. Findings indicated that wisdom played a pivotal role in mitigating the link between creativity and unethical decision-making. Furthermore, the study revealed that the role of wisdom differed between individualistic cultures, represented by the U.S., and collectivistic cultures, represented by China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100769,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Creativity","volume":"35 2","pages":"Article 100098"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unlocking unconventional pathways: How creativity may lead to unethical choices when wisdom takes a backseat\",\"authors\":\"Jinpei Wu ,&nbsp;Yiru Wang ,&nbsp;Yilong Zheng ,&nbsp;Chi Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yjoc.2025.100098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Existing research highlighted that creativity could yield both beneficial and detrimental outcomes. With the growing interest in the darker aspects of creativity, this study reviewed literature on both the positive and negative effects of creativity and proposed that the relationship between creativity and unethical decision-making was moderated by wisdom. Drawing on data from 266 individuals in the U.S. (via <span><span>www.mturk.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) and 303 individuals in China (via wjx.cn), the study employed two of Kaptein's five-factor unethical behavior scenarios to assess unethical decision-making. Wisdom was measured using the 3-D Wisdom Scale developed by Ardelt, while creativity was assessed through a revised measure based on Runco's 4Ps framework. Findings indicated that wisdom played a pivotal role in mitigating the link between creativity and unethical decision-making. Furthermore, the study revealed that the role of wisdom differed between individualistic cultures, represented by the U.S., and collectivistic cultures, represented by China.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100769,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"volume\":\"35 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100098\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Creativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374525000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Creativity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2713374525000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现有的研究强调,创造力既可能产生有益的结果,也可能产生有害的结果。随着人们对创造力的阴暗面的兴趣日益浓厚,本研究回顾了关于创造力的积极和消极影响的文献,并提出创造力和不道德决策之间的关系是由智慧调节的。这项研究利用了266名美国人(通过www.mturk.com)和303名中国人(通过wjx.cn)的数据,采用了Kaptein的五因素不道德行为场景中的两种来评估不道德决策。智慧是通过Ardelt开发的3d智慧量表来衡量的,而创造力是通过基于Runco的4Ps框架的修订测量来评估的。研究结果表明,智慧在减轻创造力和不道德决策之间的联系方面发挥了关键作用。此外,该研究还揭示了智慧的作用在以美国为代表的个人主义文化和以中国为代表的集体主义文化之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unlocking unconventional pathways: How creativity may lead to unethical choices when wisdom takes a backseat
Existing research highlighted that creativity could yield both beneficial and detrimental outcomes. With the growing interest in the darker aspects of creativity, this study reviewed literature on both the positive and negative effects of creativity and proposed that the relationship between creativity and unethical decision-making was moderated by wisdom. Drawing on data from 266 individuals in the U.S. (via www.mturk.com) and 303 individuals in China (via wjx.cn), the study employed two of Kaptein's five-factor unethical behavior scenarios to assess unethical decision-making. Wisdom was measured using the 3-D Wisdom Scale developed by Ardelt, while creativity was assessed through a revised measure based on Runco's 4Ps framework. Findings indicated that wisdom played a pivotal role in mitigating the link between creativity and unethical decision-making. Furthermore, the study revealed that the role of wisdom differed between individualistic cultures, represented by the U.S., and collectivistic cultures, represented by China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信