用千斤顶法量化干涉数据中微弱峰的检测可能性

IF 5.8 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Melanie Kaasinen, Gergö Popping, Luca Di Mascolo, Tony Mroczkowski, Leindert Boogaard, Francesco Valentino, Tom Bakx, Ilsang Yoon
{"title":"用千斤顶法量化干涉数据中微弱峰的检测可能性","authors":"Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Melanie Kaasinen, Gergö Popping, Luca Di Mascolo, Tony Mroczkowski, Leindert Boogaard, Francesco Valentino, Tom Bakx, Ilsang Yoon","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202451927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<i>Context<i/>. False-positive emission-line detections bias our understanding of astronomical sources; for example, falsely identifying <i>z<i/> ∼ 3–4 passive galaxies as <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxies leads to incorrect number counts and flawed tests of cosmology.<i>Aims<i/>. In this work, we provide a novel but simple tool to better quantify the detection of faint lines in interferometric data sets and properly characterize the underlying noise distribution. We demonstrate the method on three sets of archival observations of <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxy candidates, taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).<i>Methods<i/>. By jackknifing the visibilities using our tool, jackknify, we create observation-specific noise realizations of the interferometric measurement set. We apply a line-finding algorithm to both the noise cubes and the real data and determine the likelihood that any given positive peak is a real signal by taking the ratio of the two sampled probability distributions.<i>Results<i/>. We show that the previously reported, tentative emission-line detections of these <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxy candidates are consistent with noise. We further expand upon the technique and demonstrate how to properly incorporate prior information on the redshift of the candidate from auxiliary data, such as from the James Webb Space Telescope.<i>Conclusions<i/>. Our work highlights the need to achieve a significance of ≳ 5<i>σ<i/> to confirm an emission line when searching in broad 30 GHz bandwidths. Using our publicly available method enables the quantification of false detection likelihoods, which are crucial for accurately interpreting line detections.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying the detection likelihood of faint peaks in interferometric data through jackknifing\",\"authors\":\"Joshiwa van Marrewijk, Melanie Kaasinen, Gergö Popping, Luca Di Mascolo, Tony Mroczkowski, Leindert Boogaard, Francesco Valentino, Tom Bakx, Ilsang Yoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/0004-6361/202451927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<i>Context<i/>. False-positive emission-line detections bias our understanding of astronomical sources; for example, falsely identifying <i>z<i/> ∼ 3–4 passive galaxies as <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxies leads to incorrect number counts and flawed tests of cosmology.<i>Aims<i/>. In this work, we provide a novel but simple tool to better quantify the detection of faint lines in interferometric data sets and properly characterize the underlying noise distribution. We demonstrate the method on three sets of archival observations of <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxy candidates, taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).<i>Methods<i/>. By jackknifing the visibilities using our tool, jackknify, we create observation-specific noise realizations of the interferometric measurement set. We apply a line-finding algorithm to both the noise cubes and the real data and determine the likelihood that any given positive peak is a real signal by taking the ratio of the two sampled probability distributions.<i>Results<i/>. We show that the previously reported, tentative emission-line detections of these <i>z<i/> > 10 galaxy candidates are consistent with noise. We further expand upon the technique and demonstrate how to properly incorporate prior information on the redshift of the candidate from auxiliary data, such as from the James Webb Space Telescope.<i>Conclusions<i/>. Our work highlights the need to achieve a significance of ≳ 5<i>σ<i/> to confirm an emission line when searching in broad 30 GHz bandwidths. Using our publicly available method enables the quantification of false detection likelihoods, which are crucial for accurately interpreting line detections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Astronomy & Astrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451927\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451927","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上下文。假阳性的发射在线探测会影响我们对天文来源的理解;例如,错误地将z ~ 3-4个被动星系识别为z bbbb10个星系会导致错误的数量计数和宇宙学测试的缺陷。在这项工作中,我们提供了一种新颖而简单的工具来更好地量化干涉数据集中微弱线的检测,并适当地表征底层噪声分布。我们用阿塔卡马大型毫米波/亚毫米波阵列(ALMA)对z bbbb10候选星系的三组存档观测证明了该方法。通过使用我们的工具jackknify对可见度进行jackknify,我们创建了干涉测量集的观测特定噪声实现。我们对噪声立方体和真实数据应用寻线算法,并通过取两个采样概率分布的比率来确定任何给定的正峰值是真实信号的可能性。结果。我们表明,先前报道的这些z bbbb10候选星系的试探性发射在线检测与噪声是一致的。我们进一步扩展了这项技术,并演示了如何从辅助数据(如詹姆斯·韦伯太空望远镜)中适当地结合候选者红移的先验信息。我们的工作强调了在30 GHz宽带宽下搜索时,需要达到≥5σ的显著性来确认发射线。使用我们公开可用的方法可以量化误检可能性,这对于准确解释线检测至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying the detection likelihood of faint peaks in interferometric data through jackknifing
Context. False-positive emission-line detections bias our understanding of astronomical sources; for example, falsely identifying z ∼ 3–4 passive galaxies as z > 10 galaxies leads to incorrect number counts and flawed tests of cosmology.Aims. In this work, we provide a novel but simple tool to better quantify the detection of faint lines in interferometric data sets and properly characterize the underlying noise distribution. We demonstrate the method on three sets of archival observations of z > 10 galaxy candidates, taken with the Atacama Large Millimeter/Submillimeter Array (ALMA).Methods. By jackknifing the visibilities using our tool, jackknify, we create observation-specific noise realizations of the interferometric measurement set. We apply a line-finding algorithm to both the noise cubes and the real data and determine the likelihood that any given positive peak is a real signal by taking the ratio of the two sampled probability distributions.Results. We show that the previously reported, tentative emission-line detections of these z > 10 galaxy candidates are consistent with noise. We further expand upon the technique and demonstrate how to properly incorporate prior information on the redshift of the candidate from auxiliary data, such as from the James Webb Space Telescope.Conclusions. Our work highlights the need to achieve a significance of ≳ 5σ to confirm an emission line when searching in broad 30 GHz bandwidths. Using our publicly available method enables the quantification of false detection likelihoods, which are crucial for accurately interpreting line detections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信