R. Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters, Meghan Bastin
{"title":"阿巴拉契亚人的计算能力和读写能力与口腔健康,一项生态研究,PIAAC和BRFSS。","authors":"R. Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters, Meghan Bastin","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Social determinants of health (SDOH) include healthcare access, neighborhood/built environment, social context, economic stability, and education (including literacy and numeracy). These are known factors for health outcomes. The purpose of this research is to consider one SDOH category: general literacy/numeracy levels, with poor oral health indicators in a comparison of U.S. national and Appalachia data, a region with many poor healthcare indicators.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>For this ecological study, literacy/numeracy data were from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) Survey of Adult Skills, 2012–2017. Oral health indicators were from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2016.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of a possible score of 500 for literacy/numeracy, the mean national scores were 263.5(95% CI: 262.0, 265.1) and 249.1 (95% CI: 247.5, 250.6), respectively. The mean scores for all Appalachian counties were similar (262.2; 95% CI: 261.3, 263.1; <i>p</i> = 0.7258) and (247.6; 95% CI: 246.6, 248.6; <i>p</i> = 0.6872), respectively. However, within state comparisons had several non-Appalachian counties with higher literacy/numeracy scores than their Appalachian counties (Kentucky, Ohio, and Virginia) while in Alabama, the reverse occurred. Overall, state-wide, dental visits were not significantly different from national levels in crude percentages; however, missing any permanent teeth and edentulism were higher than the nation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Health concerns, and oral health concerns in particular, are significant for the Appalachian region. However, dental visits and the mean overall general literacy/numeracy skills were not significantly different from the nation's, indicating that other factors are driving poor health outcomes within Appalachia from an ecological perspective.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"85 2","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appalachian Numeracy and Literacy and Oral Health, an Ecological Study, PIAAC and BRFSS\",\"authors\":\"R. Constance Wiener, Christopher Waters, Meghan Bastin\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jphd.12672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Social determinants of health (SDOH) include healthcare access, neighborhood/built environment, social context, economic stability, and education (including literacy and numeracy). These are known factors for health outcomes. The purpose of this research is to consider one SDOH category: general literacy/numeracy levels, with poor oral health indicators in a comparison of U.S. national and Appalachia data, a region with many poor healthcare indicators.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>For this ecological study, literacy/numeracy data were from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) Survey of Adult Skills, 2012–2017. Oral health indicators were from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2016.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of a possible score of 500 for literacy/numeracy, the mean national scores were 263.5(95% CI: 262.0, 265.1) and 249.1 (95% CI: 247.5, 250.6), respectively. The mean scores for all Appalachian counties were similar (262.2; 95% CI: 261.3, 263.1; <i>p</i> = 0.7258) and (247.6; 95% CI: 246.6, 248.6; <i>p</i> = 0.6872), respectively. However, within state comparisons had several non-Appalachian counties with higher literacy/numeracy scores than their Appalachian counties (Kentucky, Ohio, and Virginia) while in Alabama, the reverse occurred. Overall, state-wide, dental visits were not significantly different from national levels in crude percentages; however, missing any permanent teeth and edentulism were higher than the nation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Health concerns, and oral health concerns in particular, are significant for the Appalachian region. However, dental visits and the mean overall general literacy/numeracy skills were not significantly different from the nation's, indicating that other factors are driving poor health outcomes within Appalachia from an ecological perspective.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"volume\":\"85 2\",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of public health dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12672\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12672","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Appalachian Numeracy and Literacy and Oral Health, an Ecological Study, PIAAC and BRFSS
Objectives
Social determinants of health (SDOH) include healthcare access, neighborhood/built environment, social context, economic stability, and education (including literacy and numeracy). These are known factors for health outcomes. The purpose of this research is to consider one SDOH category: general literacy/numeracy levels, with poor oral health indicators in a comparison of U.S. national and Appalachia data, a region with many poor healthcare indicators.
Methods
For this ecological study, literacy/numeracy data were from the Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC) Survey of Adult Skills, 2012–2017. Oral health indicators were from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2012–2016.
Results
Of a possible score of 500 for literacy/numeracy, the mean national scores were 263.5(95% CI: 262.0, 265.1) and 249.1 (95% CI: 247.5, 250.6), respectively. The mean scores for all Appalachian counties were similar (262.2; 95% CI: 261.3, 263.1; p = 0.7258) and (247.6; 95% CI: 246.6, 248.6; p = 0.6872), respectively. However, within state comparisons had several non-Appalachian counties with higher literacy/numeracy scores than their Appalachian counties (Kentucky, Ohio, and Virginia) while in Alabama, the reverse occurred. Overall, state-wide, dental visits were not significantly different from national levels in crude percentages; however, missing any permanent teeth and edentulism were higher than the nation.
Conclusion
Health concerns, and oral health concerns in particular, are significant for the Appalachian region. However, dental visits and the mean overall general literacy/numeracy skills were not significantly different from the nation's, indicating that other factors are driving poor health outcomes within Appalachia from an ecological perspective.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.