拉科萨胺、左乙拉西坦和丙戊酸钠作为成人癫痫状态二线疗法的比较:大型队列分析。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-22 DOI:10.1111/epi.18380
Cecil D. Hahn, Jan Novy, Andrea O. Rossetti
{"title":"拉科萨胺、左乙拉西坦和丙戊酸钠作为成人癫痫状态二线疗法的比较:大型队列分析。","authors":"Cecil D. Hahn,&nbsp;Jan Novy,&nbsp;Andrea O. Rossetti","doi":"10.1111/epi.18380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We compared the efficacy of lacosamide to other frequently used second-line anti-seizure medications (ASMs) for adult status epilepticus (SE) by conducting a retrospective analysis of an institutional SE registry between January 2013 and December 2022. Clinical outcomes assessed at discharge were categorized as return to baseline, new disability, or death; we also considered SE termination after the second-line ASM and the need for mechanical ventilation. Potential confounders included the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), sex, adequacy of initial SE treatment, treatment delay, and potentially fatal etiology. Over 10 years, 961 adult SE episodes were analyzed; 868 were treated with the following second-line ASMs: 413 levetiracetam (47.6%), 110 valproate (12.7%), and 75 lacosamide (8.6%), as well as lower rates of 18 other ASMs including benzodiazepines (not further analyzed). Univariable analysis identified STESS, treatment delay, and adequacy of initial SE treatment as potential confounders. On multivariable analysis adjusting for these variables, patients with episodes treated with second-line lacosamide, levetiracetam, or valproate demonstrated statistically equivalent rates of seizure cessation, need for mechanical ventilation, and clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. We conclude that lacosamide appears to represent a reasonable alternative to levetiracetam and valproate, and warrants consideration for inclusion in future randomized controlled trials for control of SE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"66 5","pages":"e73-e77"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of lacosamide, levetiracetam, and valproate as second-line therapy in adult status epilepticus: Analysis of a large cohort\",\"authors\":\"Cecil D. Hahn,&nbsp;Jan Novy,&nbsp;Andrea O. Rossetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We compared the efficacy of lacosamide to other frequently used second-line anti-seizure medications (ASMs) for adult status epilepticus (SE) by conducting a retrospective analysis of an institutional SE registry between January 2013 and December 2022. Clinical outcomes assessed at discharge were categorized as return to baseline, new disability, or death; we also considered SE termination after the second-line ASM and the need for mechanical ventilation. Potential confounders included the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), sex, adequacy of initial SE treatment, treatment delay, and potentially fatal etiology. Over 10 years, 961 adult SE episodes were analyzed; 868 were treated with the following second-line ASMs: 413 levetiracetam (47.6%), 110 valproate (12.7%), and 75 lacosamide (8.6%), as well as lower rates of 18 other ASMs including benzodiazepines (not further analyzed). Univariable analysis identified STESS, treatment delay, and adequacy of initial SE treatment as potential confounders. On multivariable analysis adjusting for these variables, patients with episodes treated with second-line lacosamide, levetiracetam, or valproate demonstrated statistically equivalent rates of seizure cessation, need for mechanical ventilation, and clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. We conclude that lacosamide appears to represent a reasonable alternative to levetiracetam and valproate, and warrants consideration for inclusion in future randomized controlled trials for control of SE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\"66 5\",\"pages\":\"e73-e77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18380\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18380","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过对2013年1月至2022年12月的机构癫痫持续状态(SE)登记进行回顾性分析,我们比较了拉科沙胺与其他常用的二线抗癫痫药物(asm)对成人癫痫持续状态(SE)的疗效。出院时评估的临床结果分为恢复基线、新残疾或死亡;我们还考虑了二线ASM后SE终止和机械通气的需要。潜在的混杂因素包括癫痫持续状态严重程度评分(ess)、性别、初始SE治疗的充分性、治疗延迟和潜在的致命病因。10年来,961例成人SE发作被分析;868例患者接受以下二线asm治疗:左乙拉西坦413例(47.6%),丙戊酸110例(12.7%),拉可沙胺75例(8.6%),其他18例包括苯二氮卓类药物(未进一步分析)发生率较低。单变量分析确定了ess、治疗延迟和初始SE治疗的充分性是潜在的混杂因素。在对这些变量进行调整的多变量分析中,接受二线拉科沙胺、左乙拉西坦或丙戊酸治疗的患者在癫痫发作停止率、机械通气需求和出院时的临床结果方面表现出统计学上的相等。我们的结论是,拉科沙胺似乎是左乙拉西坦和丙戊酸盐的合理替代品,值得在未来的随机对照试验中考虑纳入控制SE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of lacosamide, levetiracetam, and valproate as second-line therapy in adult status epilepticus: Analysis of a large cohort

We compared the efficacy of lacosamide to other frequently used second-line anti-seizure medications (ASMs) for adult status epilepticus (SE) by conducting a retrospective analysis of an institutional SE registry between January 2013 and December 2022. Clinical outcomes assessed at discharge were categorized as return to baseline, new disability, or death; we also considered SE termination after the second-line ASM and the need for mechanical ventilation. Potential confounders included the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), sex, adequacy of initial SE treatment, treatment delay, and potentially fatal etiology. Over 10 years, 961 adult SE episodes were analyzed; 868 were treated with the following second-line ASMs: 413 levetiracetam (47.6%), 110 valproate (12.7%), and 75 lacosamide (8.6%), as well as lower rates of 18 other ASMs including benzodiazepines (not further analyzed). Univariable analysis identified STESS, treatment delay, and adequacy of initial SE treatment as potential confounders. On multivariable analysis adjusting for these variables, patients with episodes treated with second-line lacosamide, levetiracetam, or valproate demonstrated statistically equivalent rates of seizure cessation, need for mechanical ventilation, and clinical outcomes at hospital discharge. We conclude that lacosamide appears to represent a reasonable alternative to levetiracetam and valproate, and warrants consideration for inclusion in future randomized controlled trials for control of SE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信