Mary K Eibye, Jacqueline N Poston, Amanda G Kennedy, Michael DeSarno, Rebecca M Nashett
{"title":"使用调整体重的肝素输注方案治疗静脉血栓栓塞的肥胖与非肥胖患者的抗xa水平目标时间","authors":"Mary K Eibye, Jacqueline N Poston, Amanda G Kennedy, Michael DeSarno, Rebecca M Nashett","doi":"10.1177/10600280251321478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a first-line option for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Weight-based dosing protocols have demonstrated a decreased time to therapeutic anticoagulation, however, there are limited data on their utilization in obese patients, including the type of weight used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine equivalency in time to reach target antifactor-Xa (anti-Xa) for obese and nonobese patients using the same adjusted body weight (AdjBW)-based UFH infusion protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study of patients aged 18 years or older receiving an infusion of UFH for the treatment of VTE. The primary outcome was the median time to first target anti-Xa. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of first anti-Xa levels at 6 hours that were within, below, or above the target range and the median time to the second consecutive anti-Xa level within the target range. The safety outcome of evidence of major bleed was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 166 patients assessed (75 obese and 91 nonobese), there was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW UFH protocol (12.45 vs 13.03 hours, <i>P</i> = 0.49). The percentage of patients achieving a target anti-Xa at first evaluation did not differ between obese and nonobese groups (32.0% vs 34.07%, <i>P</i> = 0.78). A total of 14 patients across groups experienced evidence of major bleed, with no observed difference between obese and nonobese groups (8.00% vs 8.89%, <i>P</i> = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW heparin infusion protocol, with no observed difference in evidence of major bleed. Our findings support the use of AdjBW in weight-based UFH dosing.</p>","PeriodicalId":7933,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"10600280251321478"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time to Target Anti-Xa Level in Obese Vs Nonobese Patients Using an Adjusted Body Weight Heparin Infusion Protocol for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.\",\"authors\":\"Mary K Eibye, Jacqueline N Poston, Amanda G Kennedy, Michael DeSarno, Rebecca M Nashett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280251321478\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a first-line option for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Weight-based dosing protocols have demonstrated a decreased time to therapeutic anticoagulation, however, there are limited data on their utilization in obese patients, including the type of weight used.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine equivalency in time to reach target antifactor-Xa (anti-Xa) for obese and nonobese patients using the same adjusted body weight (AdjBW)-based UFH infusion protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective study of patients aged 18 years or older receiving an infusion of UFH for the treatment of VTE. The primary outcome was the median time to first target anti-Xa. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of first anti-Xa levels at 6 hours that were within, below, or above the target range and the median time to the second consecutive anti-Xa level within the target range. The safety outcome of evidence of major bleed was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 166 patients assessed (75 obese and 91 nonobese), there was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW UFH protocol (12.45 vs 13.03 hours, <i>P</i> = 0.49). The percentage of patients achieving a target anti-Xa at first evaluation did not differ between obese and nonobese groups (32.0% vs 34.07%, <i>P</i> = 0.78). A total of 14 patients across groups experienced evidence of major bleed, with no observed difference between obese and nonobese groups (8.00% vs 8.89%, <i>P</i> = 0.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>There was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW heparin infusion protocol, with no observed difference in evidence of major bleed. Our findings support the use of AdjBW in weight-based UFH dosing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10600280251321478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251321478\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280251321478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:未分离肝素(UFH)是静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)急性治疗的一线选择。基于体重的给药方案已经证明治疗性抗凝时间缩短,然而,在肥胖患者中使用的数据有限,包括使用的体重类型。目的:本研究的目的是确定肥胖和非肥胖患者在使用相同的调整体重(AdjBW)为基础的UFH输注方案时达到目标抗因子xa (anti-Xa)的等效时间。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象为18岁或以上接受UFH输注治疗静脉血栓栓塞的患者。主要终点是首次靶向抗xa的中位时间。次要结局包括6小时第一次抗xa水平在目标范围内、低于或高于目标范围的百分比,以及连续第二次抗xa水平在目标范围内的中位时间。还评估了大出血证据的安全性结果。结果:在评估的166例患者中(75例肥胖和91例非肥胖),使用AdjBW UFH方案时,肥胖和非肥胖患者首次靶向抗xa的中位时间没有观察到差异(12.45小时对13.03小时,P = 0.49)。首次评估时达到目标抗xa的患者百分比在肥胖组和非肥胖组之间没有差异(32.0% vs 34.07%, P = 0.78)。两组共有14例患者出现大出血,肥胖组和非肥胖组之间没有观察到差异(8.00% vs 8.89%, P = 0.84)。结论和相关性:在使用AdjBW肝素输注方案时,肥胖患者与非肥胖患者首次靶向抗xa的中位时间没有观察到差异,大出血的证据也没有观察到差异。我们的研究结果支持在基于体重的超高频剂量中使用AdjBW。
Time to Target Anti-Xa Level in Obese Vs Nonobese Patients Using an Adjusted Body Weight Heparin Infusion Protocol for the Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism.
Background: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is a first-line option for the acute treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Weight-based dosing protocols have demonstrated a decreased time to therapeutic anticoagulation, however, there are limited data on their utilization in obese patients, including the type of weight used.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine equivalency in time to reach target antifactor-Xa (anti-Xa) for obese and nonobese patients using the same adjusted body weight (AdjBW)-based UFH infusion protocol.
Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study of patients aged 18 years or older receiving an infusion of UFH for the treatment of VTE. The primary outcome was the median time to first target anti-Xa. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of first anti-Xa levels at 6 hours that were within, below, or above the target range and the median time to the second consecutive anti-Xa level within the target range. The safety outcome of evidence of major bleed was also evaluated.
Results: Of the 166 patients assessed (75 obese and 91 nonobese), there was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW UFH protocol (12.45 vs 13.03 hours, P = 0.49). The percentage of patients achieving a target anti-Xa at first evaluation did not differ between obese and nonobese groups (32.0% vs 34.07%, P = 0.78). A total of 14 patients across groups experienced evidence of major bleed, with no observed difference between obese and nonobese groups (8.00% vs 8.89%, P = 0.84).
Conclusions and relevance: There was no observed difference in median time to first target anti-Xa in obese vs nonobese patients when using an AdjBW heparin infusion protocol, with no observed difference in evidence of major bleed. Our findings support the use of AdjBW in weight-based UFH dosing.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Pharmacotherapy (AOP) is a peer-reviewed journal that advances pharmacotherapy throughout the world by publishing high-quality research and review articles to achieve the most desired health outcomes.The articles provide cutting-edge information about the most efficient, safe and cost-effective pharmacotherapy for the treatment and prevention of various illnesses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 14 days