实施电子早期治疗评估和口服抗癌药物监测问卷。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Tiffany Bui, Brooke Looney, Josh DeClercq, Bridget Lynch, Kristen Whelchel, Scott Nelson, Autumn Zuckerman
{"title":"实施电子早期治疗评估和口服抗癌药物监测问卷。","authors":"Tiffany Bui, Brooke Looney, Josh DeClercq, Bridget Lynch, Kristen Whelchel, Scott Nelson, Autumn Zuckerman","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Disclaimer: </strong>In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the implementation of an electronic early treatment assessment and monitoring (eTEAM) questionnaire within the electronic health record (EHR) patient portal designed to identify early adverse effects to oral anticancer therapy requiring pharmacist intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement analysis used the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM implementation science framework to assess use of an innovative eTEAM questionnaire sent to patients 7 to 14 days after initial counseling on oral anticancer therapy. RE-AIM outcomes included the following: reach and adoption: the number of eTEAM questionnaires sent and the number of eTEAM responses received; effectiveness: the number of pharmacist interventions resulting from the eTEAM questionnaire; implementation: pharmacist responses to a postimplementation survey and semistructured individual interviews; maintenance: responses from postimplementation semistructured individual interviews with pharmacists. Results are reported descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 patients sent an eTEAM questionnaire, 47% (n = 85) responded. Pharmacists performed 29 interventions in 25 responding patients, most often due to adverse effects (n = 25) or adherence (n = 4). Most pharmacists agreed that the eTEAM questionnaire was appealing and feasible to use and that its use positively impacted their practice and patient care. Pharmacists recommended that the eTEAM questionnaire be improved by standardizing documentation of patients' actual oral anticancer medication start date in a discrete field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The eTEAM questionnaire was positively received by patients, and pharmacists were supportive of its continued use based on feasibility and impact on practice. The eTEAM questionnaire effectively identified opportunities for pharmacist intervention in patients starting oral anticancer medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of an electronic early treatment assessment and monitoring questionnaire for oral anticancer medication.\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Bui, Brooke Looney, Josh DeClercq, Bridget Lynch, Kristen Whelchel, Scott Nelson, Autumn Zuckerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Disclaimer: </strong>In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the implementation of an electronic early treatment assessment and monitoring (eTEAM) questionnaire within the electronic health record (EHR) patient portal designed to identify early adverse effects to oral anticancer therapy requiring pharmacist intervention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This quality improvement analysis used the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM implementation science framework to assess use of an innovative eTEAM questionnaire sent to patients 7 to 14 days after initial counseling on oral anticancer therapy. RE-AIM outcomes included the following: reach and adoption: the number of eTEAM questionnaires sent and the number of eTEAM responses received; effectiveness: the number of pharmacist interventions resulting from the eTEAM questionnaire; implementation: pharmacist responses to a postimplementation survey and semistructured individual interviews; maintenance: responses from postimplementation semistructured individual interviews with pharmacists. Results are reported descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 182 patients sent an eTEAM questionnaire, 47% (n = 85) responded. Pharmacists performed 29 interventions in 25 responding patients, most often due to adverse effects (n = 25) or adherence (n = 4). Most pharmacists agreed that the eTEAM questionnaire was appealing and feasible to use and that its use positively impacted their practice and patient care. Pharmacists recommended that the eTEAM questionnaire be improved by standardizing documentation of patients' actual oral anticancer medication start date in a discrete field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The eTEAM questionnaire was positively received by patients, and pharmacists were supportive of its continued use based on feasibility and impact on practice. The eTEAM questionnaire effectively identified opportunities for pharmacist intervention in patients starting oral anticancer medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免责声明:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受稿件后将尽快在网上发布。被接受的稿件已经过同行评审和编辑,但在技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,稍后将被最终文章(按照AJHP风格格式化并由作者校对)所取代。目的:评估电子健康记录(EHR)患者门户网站中电子早期治疗评估和监测(eTEAM)问卷的实施情况,该问卷旨在识别需要药剂师干预的口服抗癌治疗的早期不良反应。方法:本质量改进分析使用RE-AIM实施科学框架的5个维度来评估在口服抗癌治疗初始咨询后7至14天向患者发送的创新性eTEAM问卷的使用情况。RE-AIM的结果包括:覆盖面和采用率:发送电子团队问卷的数量和收到电子团队回复的数量;有效性:通过eTEAM问卷对药师进行干预的次数;实施:药剂师对实施后调查和半结构化个人访谈的反应;维护:从实施后与药剂师的半结构化个人访谈中得到的反馈。描述性地报告结果。结果:182例患者中有47% (n = 85)回复了eTEAM问卷。药剂师对25名回应的患者进行了29项干预,大多数是由于不良反应(n = 25)或依从性(n = 4)。大多数药剂师同意eTEAM问卷具有吸引力和可行性,其使用对他们的实践和患者护理产生了积极的影响。药剂师建议通过在离散字段中标准化患者实际口服抗癌药物开始日期的记录来改进eTEAM问卷。结论:eTEAM问卷得到了患者的积极接受,药师基于可行性和对实践的影响,支持其继续使用。eTEAM问卷有效地确定了药剂师对开始口服抗癌药物的患者进行干预的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of an electronic early treatment assessment and monitoring questionnaire for oral anticancer medication.

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: To evaluate the implementation of an electronic early treatment assessment and monitoring (eTEAM) questionnaire within the electronic health record (EHR) patient portal designed to identify early adverse effects to oral anticancer therapy requiring pharmacist intervention.

Methods: This quality improvement analysis used the 5 dimensions of the RE-AIM implementation science framework to assess use of an innovative eTEAM questionnaire sent to patients 7 to 14 days after initial counseling on oral anticancer therapy. RE-AIM outcomes included the following: reach and adoption: the number of eTEAM questionnaires sent and the number of eTEAM responses received; effectiveness: the number of pharmacist interventions resulting from the eTEAM questionnaire; implementation: pharmacist responses to a postimplementation survey and semistructured individual interviews; maintenance: responses from postimplementation semistructured individual interviews with pharmacists. Results are reported descriptively.

Results: Of the 182 patients sent an eTEAM questionnaire, 47% (n = 85) responded. Pharmacists performed 29 interventions in 25 responding patients, most often due to adverse effects (n = 25) or adherence (n = 4). Most pharmacists agreed that the eTEAM questionnaire was appealing and feasible to use and that its use positively impacted their practice and patient care. Pharmacists recommended that the eTEAM questionnaire be improved by standardizing documentation of patients' actual oral anticancer medication start date in a discrete field.

Conclusion: The eTEAM questionnaire was positively received by patients, and pharmacists were supportive of its continued use based on feasibility and impact on practice. The eTEAM questionnaire effectively identified opportunities for pharmacist intervention in patients starting oral anticancer medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信