基于公差的实验设计分析方法验证方法

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gule Teri, Timothy Eveleigh
{"title":"基于公差的实验设计分析方法验证方法","authors":"Gule Teri,&nbsp;Timothy Eveleigh","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-09953-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Statistically reliable analytical method validation is essential in pharmaceutical manufacturing to ensure accurate and reproducible test results, supporting quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and consistent production. However, traditional validation techniques often overlook dataset variations relative to the assay range or specification limits, potentially compromising assay fit-for-purpose, particularly for low concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, or impurities. This study aims to address these limitations by developing and applying a tolerance-based design of experiments (DOE) approach for validating analytical methods, with a focus on polyethyleneimine (PEI), an impurity associated with lentiviral vector drug products.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The tolerance-based DOE approach identifies optimal experimental designs with minimal sample sizes, considering variability relative to tolerance or design margins rather than average values. An analytical method was validated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to assess the accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision for low-concentration components. This novel framework was compared against traditional validation methods to evaluate its effectiveness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The tolerance-based approach corrected misinterpreted results for accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision, which are often skewed in traditional methods by calculations based on incorrect scales or averages. By measuring variability relative to tolerance limits, the method provides a more accurate reflection of data variations, enhancing the fitness-for-use of the assay. These results support more informed decision-making and ensure reliability and accuracy across the validation process.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates that a tolerance-based DOE approach effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional validation methods. By correctly analyzing and presenting accuracy and precision, this method enhances quality control processes and ensures the consistent production of safe and effective pharmaceutical products, offering significant advancements in validation practices, particularly for low-concentration analyses.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Tolerance-based Approach for Validating Analytical Methods Using Design of Experiments\",\"authors\":\"Gule Teri,&nbsp;Timothy Eveleigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-09953-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Statistically reliable analytical method validation is essential in pharmaceutical manufacturing to ensure accurate and reproducible test results, supporting quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and consistent production. However, traditional validation techniques often overlook dataset variations relative to the assay range or specification limits, potentially compromising assay fit-for-purpose, particularly for low concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, or impurities. This study aims to address these limitations by developing and applying a tolerance-based design of experiments (DOE) approach for validating analytical methods, with a focus on polyethyleneimine (PEI), an impurity associated with lentiviral vector drug products.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The tolerance-based DOE approach identifies optimal experimental designs with minimal sample sizes, considering variability relative to tolerance or design margins rather than average values. An analytical method was validated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to assess the accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision for low-concentration components. This novel framework was compared against traditional validation methods to evaluate its effectiveness.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The tolerance-based approach corrected misinterpreted results for accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision, which are often skewed in traditional methods by calculations based on incorrect scales or averages. By measuring variability relative to tolerance limits, the method provides a more accurate reflection of data variations, enhancing the fitness-for-use of the assay. These results support more informed decision-making and ensure reliability and accuracy across the validation process.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates that a tolerance-based DOE approach effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional validation methods. By correctly analyzing and presenting accuracy and precision, this method enhances quality control processes and ensures the consistent production of safe and effective pharmaceutical products, offering significant advancements in validation practices, particularly for low-concentration analyses.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-09953-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-09953-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的统计可靠的分析方法验证在药品生产中是必不可少的,以确保准确和可重复的测试结果,支持质量保证,法规符合性和一致性生产。然而,传统的验证技术往往忽略了相对于分析范围或规格限制的数据集变化,这可能会影响分析的适用性,特别是对于低浓度的活性药物成分(api)、赋形剂或杂质。本研究旨在通过开发和应用基于耐受性的实验设计(DOE)方法来验证分析方法,重点关注与慢病毒载体药物产品相关的杂质聚乙烯亚胺(PEI),从而解决这些局限性。方法基于公差的DOE方法以最小样本量确定最佳实验设计,考虑相对于公差或设计边际的可变性,而不是平均值。采用高效液相色谱法对低浓度成分的准确度、重复性和中间精密度进行了验证。将该框架与传统的验证方法进行了比较,以评估其有效性。结果基于容差的方法纠正了传统方法中由于不正确的尺度或平均值计算而导致的准确度、可重复性和中间精密度的错误解释。通过测量相对于公差限制的可变性,该方法提供了更准确的数据变化的反映,增强了该分析的适用性。这些结果支持更明智的决策,并确保整个验证过程的可靠性和准确性。结论基于耐受性的DOE方法有效克服了传统验证方法的局限性。通过正确分析和呈现准确性和精密度,该方法加强了质量控制过程,确保安全有效药品的一致生产,在验证实践中提供了重大进步,特别是对于低浓度分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Tolerance-based Approach for Validating Analytical Methods Using Design of Experiments

Purpose

Statistically reliable analytical method validation is essential in pharmaceutical manufacturing to ensure accurate and reproducible test results, supporting quality assurance, regulatory compliance, and consistent production. However, traditional validation techniques often overlook dataset variations relative to the assay range or specification limits, potentially compromising assay fit-for-purpose, particularly for low concentrations of active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs), excipients, or impurities. This study aims to address these limitations by developing and applying a tolerance-based design of experiments (DOE) approach for validating analytical methods, with a focus on polyethyleneimine (PEI), an impurity associated with lentiviral vector drug products.

Methods

The tolerance-based DOE approach identifies optimal experimental designs with minimal sample sizes, considering variability relative to tolerance or design margins rather than average values. An analytical method was validated using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to assess the accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision for low-concentration components. This novel framework was compared against traditional validation methods to evaluate its effectiveness.

Results

The tolerance-based approach corrected misinterpreted results for accuracy, repeatability, and intermediate precision, which are often skewed in traditional methods by calculations based on incorrect scales or averages. By measuring variability relative to tolerance limits, the method provides a more accurate reflection of data variations, enhancing the fitness-for-use of the assay. These results support more informed decision-making and ensure reliability and accuracy across the validation process.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that a tolerance-based DOE approach effectively overcomes the limitations of traditional validation methods. By correctly analyzing and presenting accuracy and precision, this method enhances quality control processes and ensures the consistent production of safe and effective pharmaceutical products, offering significant advancements in validation practices, particularly for low-concentration analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信