医疗保险改头换面等等。

Jane Philpott, Duncan Sinclair
{"title":"医疗保险改头换面等等。","authors":"Jane Philpott, Duncan Sinclair","doi":"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In \"Medicare Makeover: Reimagining the Canada Health Act at 40,\" Flood and Thomas (2025) study access and comprehensiveness in the <i>Canada Health Act</i> (1985). They note a decline in timely access to care and advocate for the establishment of benchmarks for access, suggesting provinces should meet those standards in exchange for federal funding. They call for a re-evaluation of what constitutes \"medically necessary\" services, proposing a broader list of supports while ensuring equitable access regardless of financial status. Building on their recommendations, we argue for deeper systemic reform to Canadian medicare. Collaborative care models and decision making by local teams will enhance service delivery and outcomes. We also expand on the process for determining insured services, including a multi-government task force and public consultation. We suggest that proactive measures should be implemented immediately while advocating for a stronger legislative framework as proposed by Flood and Thomas to ensure the sustainability of Canadian medicare.</p>","PeriodicalId":101342,"journal":{"name":"HealthcarePapers","volume":"22 3","pages":"63-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicare Makeover and More.\",\"authors\":\"Jane Philpott, Duncan Sinclair\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpap.2025.27536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In \\\"Medicare Makeover: Reimagining the Canada Health Act at 40,\\\" Flood and Thomas (2025) study access and comprehensiveness in the <i>Canada Health Act</i> (1985). They note a decline in timely access to care and advocate for the establishment of benchmarks for access, suggesting provinces should meet those standards in exchange for federal funding. They call for a re-evaluation of what constitutes \\\"medically necessary\\\" services, proposing a broader list of supports while ensuring equitable access regardless of financial status. Building on their recommendations, we argue for deeper systemic reform to Canadian medicare. Collaborative care models and decision making by local teams will enhance service delivery and outcomes. We also expand on the process for determining insured services, including a multi-government task force and public consultation. We suggest that proactive measures should be implemented immediately while advocating for a stronger legislative framework as proposed by Flood and Thomas to ensure the sustainability of Canadian medicare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"63-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HealthcarePapers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27536\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HealthcarePapers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpap.2025.27536","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在“医疗改革:重新构想40年的加拿大卫生法”中,Flood和Thomas(2025)研究了1985年加拿大卫生法的可及性和全面性。他们注意到及时获得医疗服务的情况有所下降,并主张建立获得医疗服务的基准,建议各省应该达到这些标准,以换取联邦政府的资助。他们呼吁重新评估什么是“医疗必要”服务,提出更广泛的支助清单,同时确保不论财务状况如何都能公平获得支助。在他们建议的基础上,我们主张对加拿大医疗保险进行更深层次的系统性改革。协作式护理模式和当地团队的决策将改善服务的提供和结果。我们还扩大了确定保险服务的过程,包括一个多政府工作组和公众咨询。我们建议,应立即采取积极措施,同时倡导弗拉德和托马斯提出的更强有力的立法框架,以确保加拿大医疗保险的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicare Makeover and More.

In "Medicare Makeover: Reimagining the Canada Health Act at 40," Flood and Thomas (2025) study access and comprehensiveness in the Canada Health Act (1985). They note a decline in timely access to care and advocate for the establishment of benchmarks for access, suggesting provinces should meet those standards in exchange for federal funding. They call for a re-evaluation of what constitutes "medically necessary" services, proposing a broader list of supports while ensuring equitable access regardless of financial status. Building on their recommendations, we argue for deeper systemic reform to Canadian medicare. Collaborative care models and decision making by local teams will enhance service delivery and outcomes. We also expand on the process for determining insured services, including a multi-government task force and public consultation. We suggest that proactive measures should be implemented immediately while advocating for a stronger legislative framework as proposed by Flood and Thomas to ensure the sustainability of Canadian medicare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信