了解医院安全网:医院资源限制对前列腺癌治疗的影响超越了社会经济差异。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Raj R Bhanvadia, Rohit R Badia, Fady J Baky, Jennifer W Tse, Yair Lotan, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis
{"title":"了解医院安全网:医院资源限制对前列腺癌治疗的影响超越了社会经济差异。","authors":"Raj R Bhanvadia, Rohit R Badia, Fady J Baky, Jennifer W Tse, Yair Lotan, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.9038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Safety net hospitals (SNHs) care for a substantial population of vulnerable patients and are often resource-limited. These limitations may impact treatment decisions for high-risk prostate cancer (hPCa). We performed the first population-based analysis examining SNH status and treatment decisions for localized hPCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National cancer database (NCDB) was queried from 2010-2016 for patients with non-metastatic hPCa. SNH status was defined as hospitals with the 95<sup>th</sup> percentile of Medicaid and uninsured caseload. Non-curative intent treatment was defined as androgen deprivation monotherapy (ADT) or no treatment. Outcomes assessed were treatment choice and overall survival (OS) by SNH status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 747 patients with hPCa were included; 112 hospitals were identified as SNHs with mean Medicaid/uninsured caseload of 24.4% compared to 3.2% at non-SNHs (p<0.01). Patients at SNHs were independently associated with greater odds of non-curative intent treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, p<0.01). Results were consistent across subgroups: private insurance (OR 2.2, p<0.01), age <65 (OR 2.3, p<0.01), and at academic centers (OR 1.9, p<0.01). There was no difference in OS among SNHs and non-SNHs when patients received curative treatment. Among patients who did not receive curative treatment, OS was greater at SNHs (hazard ratio 0.82, p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients at SNHs were more likely to receive non-curative treatment independent of known socioeconomic risk factors. Private insurance or treatment at academic centers did not mitigate these disparities. Increased resources may be needed at SNHs, especially in the context of healthcare expansion, which may further strain these facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the hospital safety net: Hospital resource limitations impact prostate cancer treatment beyond socioeconomic disparities.\",\"authors\":\"Raj R Bhanvadia, Rohit R Badia, Fady J Baky, Jennifer W Tse, Yair Lotan, Solomon L Woldu, Vitaly Margulis\",\"doi\":\"10.5489/cuaj.9038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Safety net hospitals (SNHs) care for a substantial population of vulnerable patients and are often resource-limited. These limitations may impact treatment decisions for high-risk prostate cancer (hPCa). We performed the first population-based analysis examining SNH status and treatment decisions for localized hPCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National cancer database (NCDB) was queried from 2010-2016 for patients with non-metastatic hPCa. SNH status was defined as hospitals with the 95<sup>th</sup> percentile of Medicaid and uninsured caseload. Non-curative intent treatment was defined as androgen deprivation monotherapy (ADT) or no treatment. Outcomes assessed were treatment choice and overall survival (OS) by SNH status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 95 747 patients with hPCa were included; 112 hospitals were identified as SNHs with mean Medicaid/uninsured caseload of 24.4% compared to 3.2% at non-SNHs (p<0.01). Patients at SNHs were independently associated with greater odds of non-curative intent treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, p<0.01). Results were consistent across subgroups: private insurance (OR 2.2, p<0.01), age <65 (OR 2.3, p<0.01), and at academic centers (OR 1.9, p<0.01). There was no difference in OS among SNHs and non-SNHs when patients received curative treatment. Among patients who did not receive curative treatment, OS was greater at SNHs (hazard ratio 0.82, p=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients at SNHs were more likely to receive non-curative treatment independent of known socioeconomic risk factors. Private insurance or treatment at academic centers did not mitigate these disparities. Increased resources may be needed at SNHs, especially in the context of healthcare expansion, which may further strain these facilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.9038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:安全网医院(SNHs)照顾大量弱势患者,往往资源有限。这些限制可能会影响高风险前列腺癌(hPCa)的治疗决策。我们进行了首次基于人群的分析,检查SNH状态和局部hPCa的治疗决策。方法:查询2010-2016年非转移性hPCa患者的国家癌症数据库(NCDB)。SNH状态被定义为医院的第95百分位数的医疗补助和无保险的病例量。非治愈意图治疗被定义为雄激素剥夺单药治疗(ADT)或不治疗。评估的结果是治疗选择和SNH状态的总生存期(OS)。结果:共纳入95747例hPCa患者;112家医院被确定为snh,平均医疗补助/无保险病例量为24.4%,而非snh的平均病例量为3.2%(结论:snh的患者更有可能接受独立于已知社会经济风险因素的非治愈性治疗。私人保险或学术中心的治疗并没有缓解这些差异。snh可能需要增加资源,特别是在医疗保健扩大的背景下,这可能进一步使这些设施紧张。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Understanding the hospital safety net: Hospital resource limitations impact prostate cancer treatment beyond socioeconomic disparities.

Introduction: Safety net hospitals (SNHs) care for a substantial population of vulnerable patients and are often resource-limited. These limitations may impact treatment decisions for high-risk prostate cancer (hPCa). We performed the first population-based analysis examining SNH status and treatment decisions for localized hPCa.

Methods: National cancer database (NCDB) was queried from 2010-2016 for patients with non-metastatic hPCa. SNH status was defined as hospitals with the 95th percentile of Medicaid and uninsured caseload. Non-curative intent treatment was defined as androgen deprivation monotherapy (ADT) or no treatment. Outcomes assessed were treatment choice and overall survival (OS) by SNH status.

Results: A total of 95 747 patients with hPCa were included; 112 hospitals were identified as SNHs with mean Medicaid/uninsured caseload of 24.4% compared to 3.2% at non-SNHs (p<0.01). Patients at SNHs were independently associated with greater odds of non-curative intent treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.2, p<0.01). Results were consistent across subgroups: private insurance (OR 2.2, p<0.01), age <65 (OR 2.3, p<0.01), and at academic centers (OR 1.9, p<0.01). There was no difference in OS among SNHs and non-SNHs when patients received curative treatment. Among patients who did not receive curative treatment, OS was greater at SNHs (hazard ratio 0.82, p=0.02).

Conclusions: Patients at SNHs were more likely to receive non-curative treatment independent of known socioeconomic risk factors. Private insurance or treatment at academic centers did not mitigate these disparities. Increased resources may be needed at SNHs, especially in the context of healthcare expansion, which may further strain these facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信