模拟测试对环境数字记录仪评价的价值:一个案例报告。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Joshua M Biro, Jessica L Handley, James Mickler, Sahithi Reddy, Varsha Kottamasu, Raj M Ratwani, Nathan K Cobb
{"title":"模拟测试对环境数字记录仪评价的价值:一个案例报告。","authors":"Joshua M Biro, Jessica L Handley, James Mickler, Sahithi Reddy, Varsha Kottamasu, Raj M Ratwani, Nathan K Cobb","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this work is to demonstrate the value of simulation testing for rapidly evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) products.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Researcher-physician teams simulated the use of 2 Ambient Digital Scribe (ADS) products by reading scripts of outpatient encounters while using both products, yielding a total of 44 draft notes. Time to edit, perceived amount of effort and editing, and errors in the AI-generated draft notes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ambient Digital Scribe Product A draft notes took significantly longer to edit, had fewer omissions, and more additions and irrelevant or misplaced text errors than ADS Product B. Ambient Digital Scribe Product A was rated as performing better for most encounters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Artificial intelligence-enabled products are being rapidly developed and implemented into practice, outpacing safety concerns. Simulation testing can efficiently identify safety issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation testing is a crucial first step to take when evaluating AI-enabled technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of simulation testing for the evaluation of ambient digital scribes: a case report.\",\"authors\":\"Joshua M Biro, Jessica L Handley, James Mickler, Sahithi Reddy, Varsha Kottamasu, Raj M Ratwani, Nathan K Cobb\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this work is to demonstrate the value of simulation testing for rapidly evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) products.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Researcher-physician teams simulated the use of 2 Ambient Digital Scribe (ADS) products by reading scripts of outpatient encounters while using both products, yielding a total of 44 draft notes. Time to edit, perceived amount of effort and editing, and errors in the AI-generated draft notes were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ambient Digital Scribe Product A draft notes took significantly longer to edit, had fewer omissions, and more additions and irrelevant or misplaced text errors than ADS Product B. Ambient Digital Scribe Product A was rated as performing better for most encounters.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Artificial intelligence-enabled products are being rapidly developed and implemented into practice, outpacing safety concerns. Simulation testing can efficiently identify safety issues.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simulation testing is a crucial first step to take when evaluating AI-enabled technologies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf052\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:这项工作的目的是证明模拟测试对快速评估人工智能(AI)产品的价值。材料和方法:研究人员-医生团队模拟了两种Ambient Digital Scribe (ADS)产品的使用,在使用这两种产品的同时,通过阅读门诊病人的病历,得出了总共44份草稿笔记。分析了编辑时间、感知到的工作量和编辑量以及人工智能生成的草稿笔记中的错误。结果:与ADS产品b相比,Ambient Digital Scribe产品A的草稿笔记编辑时间明显更长,遗漏更少,增加的内容和不相关或放错位置的文本错误更多。讨论:人工智能支持的产品正在迅速开发并付诸实践,超越了安全问题。仿真测试可以有效地识别安全问题。结论:在评估人工智能技术时,模拟测试是关键的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The value of simulation testing for the evaluation of ambient digital scribes: a case report.

Objectives: The objective of this work is to demonstrate the value of simulation testing for rapidly evaluating artificial intelligence (AI) products.

Materials and methods: Researcher-physician teams simulated the use of 2 Ambient Digital Scribe (ADS) products by reading scripts of outpatient encounters while using both products, yielding a total of 44 draft notes. Time to edit, perceived amount of effort and editing, and errors in the AI-generated draft notes were analyzed.

Results: Ambient Digital Scribe Product A draft notes took significantly longer to edit, had fewer omissions, and more additions and irrelevant or misplaced text errors than ADS Product B. Ambient Digital Scribe Product A was rated as performing better for most encounters.

Discussion: Artificial intelligence-enabled products are being rapidly developed and implemented into practice, outpacing safety concerns. Simulation testing can efficiently identify safety issues.

Conclusion: Simulation testing is a crucial first step to take when evaluating AI-enabled technologies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信