在只有短期结果的情况下对儿童早期状况进行长期影响评价。

IF 1.5 4区 社会学 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sharon Picco , Chiara Pronzato
{"title":"在只有短期结果的情况下对儿童早期状况进行长期影响评价。","authors":"Sharon Picco ,&nbsp;Chiara Pronzato","doi":"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Over the past two decades, socio-economic research has highlighted and empirically demonstrated the importance of investing in early childhood development for long-term life outcomes. In response, governments and foundations have increasingly allocated resources to preschool initiatives, promoting formal childcare, encouraging access to libraries and playrooms, and facilitating parent-child activities aimed at enhancing parenting skills. While the short-term effects of many of these policies are frequently assessed, evaluating their long-term impact remains challenging due to high costs and logistical complexities. How can meaningful insights into long-term effects be derived when only short-term outcomes are available? Adopting the “surrogacy” framework proposed by Athey et al. (2024) and using data from the Millennium Cohort Study (UK), we predict long-term outcomes assuming only short-term outcomes are available, and compare them with the actual ones. This analysis introduces a valuable tool for policymakers and program evaluators, helping to identify key outcome variables for impact assessment and the prediction of long-term effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48046,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation and Program Planning","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 102584"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term impact evaluation of early childhood conditions When only short-term outcomes are available\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Picco ,&nbsp;Chiara Pronzato\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2025.102584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Over the past two decades, socio-economic research has highlighted and empirically demonstrated the importance of investing in early childhood development for long-term life outcomes. In response, governments and foundations have increasingly allocated resources to preschool initiatives, promoting formal childcare, encouraging access to libraries and playrooms, and facilitating parent-child activities aimed at enhancing parenting skills. While the short-term effects of many of these policies are frequently assessed, evaluating their long-term impact remains challenging due to high costs and logistical complexities. How can meaningful insights into long-term effects be derived when only short-term outcomes are available? Adopting the “surrogacy” framework proposed by Athey et al. (2024) and using data from the Millennium Cohort Study (UK), we predict long-term outcomes assuming only short-term outcomes are available, and compare them with the actual ones. This analysis introduces a valuable tool for policymakers and program evaluators, helping to identify key outcome variables for impact assessment and the prediction of long-term effects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102584\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation and Program Planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000515\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation and Program Planning","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718925000515","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去二十年中,社会经济研究强调并从经验上证明了投资于儿童早期发展对长期生活结果的重要性。作为回应,各国政府和基金会越来越多地为学前倡议分配资源,促进正式的儿童保育,鼓励使用图书馆和游戏室,并促进旨在提高育儿技能的亲子活动。虽然经常评估其中许多政策的短期影响,但由于成本高和后勤复杂,评估其长期影响仍然具有挑战性。在只有短期结果的情况下,如何得出对长期影响有意义的见解?采用Athey等人(2024)提出的“替代”框架,并使用千禧队列研究(英国)的数据,我们在假设只有短期结果的情况下预测长期结果,并将其与实际结果进行比较。该分析为政策制定者和项目评估人员提供了一个有价值的工具,有助于确定影响评估和长期影响预测的关键结果变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term impact evaluation of early childhood conditions When only short-term outcomes are available
Over the past two decades, socio-economic research has highlighted and empirically demonstrated the importance of investing in early childhood development for long-term life outcomes. In response, governments and foundations have increasingly allocated resources to preschool initiatives, promoting formal childcare, encouraging access to libraries and playrooms, and facilitating parent-child activities aimed at enhancing parenting skills. While the short-term effects of many of these policies are frequently assessed, evaluating their long-term impact remains challenging due to high costs and logistical complexities. How can meaningful insights into long-term effects be derived when only short-term outcomes are available? Adopting the “surrogacy” framework proposed by Athey et al. (2024) and using data from the Millennium Cohort Study (UK), we predict long-term outcomes assuming only short-term outcomes are available, and compare them with the actual ones. This analysis introduces a valuable tool for policymakers and program evaluators, helping to identify key outcome variables for impact assessment and the prediction of long-term effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation and Program Planning
Evaluation and Program Planning SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Evaluation and Program Planning is based on the principle that the techniques and methods of evaluation and planning transcend the boundaries of specific fields and that relevant contributions to these areas come from people representing many different positions, intellectual traditions, and interests. In order to further the development of evaluation and planning, we publish articles from the private and public sectors in a wide range of areas: organizational development and behavior, training, planning, human resource development, health and mental, social services, mental retardation, corrections, substance abuse, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信