IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
L.S. Hansen , A.C. Bouwman , G. Sahana , M. Slagboom , H.M. Nielsen , E.D. Ellen
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of phenotypic, pedigree, and family-based selection in insect breeding using stochastic simulation","authors":"L.S. Hansen ,&nbsp;A.C. Bouwman ,&nbsp;G. Sahana ,&nbsp;M. Slagboom ,&nbsp;H.M. Nielsen ,&nbsp;E.D. Ellen","doi":"10.1016/j.animal.2025.101475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Selective breeding in insects has predominantly relied on phenotypic selection without considering relatedness. Selection on estimated breeding values could potentially increase genetic gain, but the challenge of pedigree tracking complicates this. Family selection can be used as an alternative to individual selection, either using combined between- and within-family selection, or strict between-family selection with full-sib group records as a proxy for individual data. The effectiveness of family selection can however be compromised by the presence of unmitigated common environmental effects. In this study, we employ stochastic simulations to explore expected genetic gain and rate of inbreeding in insect populations under four single-trait selection schemes: phenotypic selection, individual pedigree selection, combined selection using both family and individual breeding values for selection, and between-family selection using full-sib average phenotypes for breeding value estimation. These schemes are compared on genetic gain and rate of inbreeding across five trait heritabilities (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6), two variations in number of families in the population (60 or 200), and two offspring group structures for the family breeding schemes (1 or 3 sib groups per female) with a fixed common environment effect. Selection based on individual breeding values results in significantly higher genetic gain than phenotypic selection at low heritability (≤ 0.1), and similar gain at heritability &gt; 0.1. Phenotypic selection results in a lower rate of inbreeding (0.003–0.011) compared to other schemes (0.005–0.055) at low heritability (≤ 0.1), but this difference is reduced as heritability increases. Combined selection results in genetic gain between that of the phenotypic and individual pedigree schemes, depending on sib group structure and heritability. Using between-family selection reduces genetic gain (0.23–1.97) compared to other schemes (0.40–4.34). Establishing multiple sib-groups mitigates the confounding of genetic and common environment effects, and thus the reduction in genetic gain from family selection schemes. Increasing the number of families from 60 to 200 in the breeding population reduces inbreeding in all scenarios (ΔF at 60 families is 0.009–0.055, at 200 families is 0.003–0.031). We conclude that selection on individual breeding values yields greater genetic gain compared to family breeding values and selection on phenotypes. The between-family approach is an alternative when individual pedigrees are not feasible to maintain. Phenotypic selection results in both high genetic gain and generally low rates of inbreeding, but as heritability increases, so does the rate of inbreeding. Therefore, phenotypic selection should not be implemented without any inbreeding control in long−term selection.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50789,"journal":{"name":"Animal","volume":"19 4","pages":"Article 101475"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751731125000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

昆虫的选择性育种主要依靠表型选择,而不考虑亲缘关系。根据估计育种值进行选择可能会增加遗传增益,但血统跟踪的挑战使这一问题变得复杂。家系选择可以作为个体选择的替代方法,既可以使用家系间和家系内的组合选择,也可以使用全兄弟姐妹群体记录作为个体数据的替代,进行严格的家系间选择。然而,家族选择的有效性可能会受到未缓解的共同环境效应的影响。在本研究中,我们采用随机模拟的方法探讨了昆虫种群在以下四种单一性状选择方案下的预期遗传增益和近交率:表型选择、个体血统选择、使用家系和个体育种值进行组合选择,以及使用全同胞平均表型进行育种值估算的家系间选择。比较了这些方案在五个性状遗传率(0.05、0.1、0.2、0.4 和 0.6)、种群中两个家系数量变化(60 或 200)以及具有固定共同环境效应的家系育种方案的两种后代群体结构(每个雌性 1 或 3 个兄弟姐妹群体)下的遗传增益和近交率。在遗传率较低(≤ 0.1)的情况下,基于个体育种值的选择所产生的遗传增益明显高于表型选择,而在遗传率大于 0.1 的情况下,遗传增益相近。在低遗传率(≤ 0.1)条件下,表型选择的近交率(0.003-0.011)低于其他方案(0.005-0.055),但随着遗传率的增加,这种差异会缩小。综合选择的遗传增益介于表型选择和个体血统选择之间,具体取决于兄弟姐妹群体结构和遗传率。与其他方案(0.40-4.34)相比,家族间选择降低了遗传增益(0.23-1.97)。建立多个兄弟姐妹群体可减轻遗传效应和共同环境效应的混杂,从而降低家系选择方案的遗传增益。将育种群体中的家系数量从 60 个增加到 200 个,在所有方案中都能减少近亲繁殖(60 个家系时的ΔF 为 0.009-0.055,200 个家系时的ΔF 为 0.003-0.031)。我们的结论是,与家系育种值和表型选择相比,个体育种值选择能产生更大的遗传增益。在无法保留个体血统的情况下,家系间选择是一种替代方法。表型选择既能带来较高的遗传增益,近亲繁殖率一般也较低,但随着遗传率的增加,近亲繁殖率也会增加。因此,在长期选择中,表型选择不应在没有近交控制的情况下实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of phenotypic, pedigree, and family-based selection in insect breeding using stochastic simulation
Selective breeding in insects has predominantly relied on phenotypic selection without considering relatedness. Selection on estimated breeding values could potentially increase genetic gain, but the challenge of pedigree tracking complicates this. Family selection can be used as an alternative to individual selection, either using combined between- and within-family selection, or strict between-family selection with full-sib group records as a proxy for individual data. The effectiveness of family selection can however be compromised by the presence of unmitigated common environmental effects. In this study, we employ stochastic simulations to explore expected genetic gain and rate of inbreeding in insect populations under four single-trait selection schemes: phenotypic selection, individual pedigree selection, combined selection using both family and individual breeding values for selection, and between-family selection using full-sib average phenotypes for breeding value estimation. These schemes are compared on genetic gain and rate of inbreeding across five trait heritabilities (0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6), two variations in number of families in the population (60 or 200), and two offspring group structures for the family breeding schemes (1 or 3 sib groups per female) with a fixed common environment effect. Selection based on individual breeding values results in significantly higher genetic gain than phenotypic selection at low heritability (≤ 0.1), and similar gain at heritability > 0.1. Phenotypic selection results in a lower rate of inbreeding (0.003–0.011) compared to other schemes (0.005–0.055) at low heritability (≤ 0.1), but this difference is reduced as heritability increases. Combined selection results in genetic gain between that of the phenotypic and individual pedigree schemes, depending on sib group structure and heritability. Using between-family selection reduces genetic gain (0.23–1.97) compared to other schemes (0.40–4.34). Establishing multiple sib-groups mitigates the confounding of genetic and common environment effects, and thus the reduction in genetic gain from family selection schemes. Increasing the number of families from 60 to 200 in the breeding population reduces inbreeding in all scenarios (ΔF at 60 families is 0.009–0.055, at 200 families is 0.003–0.031). We conclude that selection on individual breeding values yields greater genetic gain compared to family breeding values and selection on phenotypes. The between-family approach is an alternative when individual pedigrees are not feasible to maintain. Phenotypic selection results in both high genetic gain and generally low rates of inbreeding, but as heritability increases, so does the rate of inbreeding. Therefore, phenotypic selection should not be implemented without any inbreeding control in long−term selection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animal
Animal 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
246
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Editorial board animal attracts the best research in animal biology and animal systems from across the spectrum of the agricultural, biomedical, and environmental sciences. It is the central element in an exciting collaboration between the British Society of Animal Science (BSAS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) and the European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP) and represents a merging of three scientific journals: Animal Science; Animal Research; Reproduction, Nutrition, Development. animal publishes original cutting-edge research, ''hot'' topics and horizon-scanning reviews on animal-related aspects of the life sciences at the molecular, cellular, organ, whole animal and production system levels. The main subject areas include: breeding and genetics; nutrition; physiology and functional biology of systems; behaviour, health and welfare; farming systems, environmental impact and climate change; product quality, human health and well-being. Animal models and papers dealing with the integration of research between these topics and their impact on the environment and people are particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信