Heather Bruckman, Laura A Blazier, Sarah E Wing, Frances A Boyle, Rupa Radhakrishnan, Beatrice M Stefanescu
{"title":"减少镇静方案对接受核磁共振成像扫描婴儿的影响","authors":"Heather Bruckman, Laura A Blazier, Sarah E Wing, Frances A Boyle, Rupa Radhakrishnan, Beatrice M Stefanescu","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic tool for infants with possible brain abnormalities. While sedation may be necessary for high quality images, it carries risks of complications. The sedation rate for MRI procedure varies widely, ranging from 0% to 100%, influenced by infant characteristics and institutional practices, with an increasing focus on non-sedated or minimally sedated approaches to reduce risks.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We studied sedation utilization in infants undergoing MRI scanning before and after implementing an MRI bundle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study utilized a pre- post-intervention design. An MRI bundle, including a process map, a safety checklist and a questionnaire collecting detailed information on sedation, were developed for our off-unit MRI suite. Pre-intervention group included infants scanned March 2018 to February 2019, and Post-intervention group March 2019 to February 2022. We hypothesized that sedation rates would significantly decrease following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 229 infants in the Pre-Intervention group and 764 infants in the Post-Intervention group underwent MRI scanning. Sedation use decreased by 62%, from 29% pre-intervention to 18% post-intervention ( P = 0.0003). Post-intervention infants were 47.6% less likely to be sedated, adjusting for gestation-corrected age (OR 0.524 [0.369, 0.745]; P < 0.01). Each 1-week increase in gestation-corrected age was associated with a 7.1% increase in the odds of sedation, controlling for the intervention time-period (OR 1.071 [1.022, 1.122]; P = 0.004). The questionnaire was completed 72% of the time in the post-intervention group.</p><p><strong>Implication for practice and research: </strong>A standardized approach and protocol development can significantly reduce sedation for neonatal MRI. This study offers guidance for future research and integrated care interventions across medical teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"120-128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a Sedation Reduction Protocol in Infants Undergoing MRI Scanning.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Bruckman, Laura A Blazier, Sarah E Wing, Frances A Boyle, Rupa Radhakrishnan, Beatrice M Stefanescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic tool for infants with possible brain abnormalities. While sedation may be necessary for high quality images, it carries risks of complications. The sedation rate for MRI procedure varies widely, ranging from 0% to 100%, influenced by infant characteristics and institutional practices, with an increasing focus on non-sedated or minimally sedated approaches to reduce risks.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We studied sedation utilization in infants undergoing MRI scanning before and after implementing an MRI bundle.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cohort study utilized a pre- post-intervention design. An MRI bundle, including a process map, a safety checklist and a questionnaire collecting detailed information on sedation, were developed for our off-unit MRI suite. Pre-intervention group included infants scanned March 2018 to February 2019, and Post-intervention group March 2019 to February 2022. We hypothesized that sedation rates would significantly decrease following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the study, 229 infants in the Pre-Intervention group and 764 infants in the Post-Intervention group underwent MRI scanning. Sedation use decreased by 62%, from 29% pre-intervention to 18% post-intervention ( P = 0.0003). Post-intervention infants were 47.6% less likely to be sedated, adjusting for gestation-corrected age (OR 0.524 [0.369, 0.745]; P < 0.01). Each 1-week increase in gestation-corrected age was associated with a 7.1% increase in the odds of sedation, controlling for the intervention time-period (OR 1.071 [1.022, 1.122]; P = 0.004). The questionnaire was completed 72% of the time in the post-intervention group.</p><p><strong>Implication for practice and research: </strong>A standardized approach and protocol development can significantly reduce sedation for neonatal MRI. This study offers guidance for future research and integrated care interventions across medical teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"120-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Neonatal Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001243\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001243","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of a Sedation Reduction Protocol in Infants Undergoing MRI Scanning.
Background: Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important diagnostic tool for infants with possible brain abnormalities. While sedation may be necessary for high quality images, it carries risks of complications. The sedation rate for MRI procedure varies widely, ranging from 0% to 100%, influenced by infant characteristics and institutional practices, with an increasing focus on non-sedated or minimally sedated approaches to reduce risks.
Purpose: We studied sedation utilization in infants undergoing MRI scanning before and after implementing an MRI bundle.
Methods: This cohort study utilized a pre- post-intervention design. An MRI bundle, including a process map, a safety checklist and a questionnaire collecting detailed information on sedation, were developed for our off-unit MRI suite. Pre-intervention group included infants scanned March 2018 to February 2019, and Post-intervention group March 2019 to February 2022. We hypothesized that sedation rates would significantly decrease following the intervention.
Results: In the study, 229 infants in the Pre-Intervention group and 764 infants in the Post-Intervention group underwent MRI scanning. Sedation use decreased by 62%, from 29% pre-intervention to 18% post-intervention ( P = 0.0003). Post-intervention infants were 47.6% less likely to be sedated, adjusting for gestation-corrected age (OR 0.524 [0.369, 0.745]; P < 0.01). Each 1-week increase in gestation-corrected age was associated with a 7.1% increase in the odds of sedation, controlling for the intervention time-period (OR 1.071 [1.022, 1.122]; P = 0.004). The questionnaire was completed 72% of the time in the post-intervention group.
Implication for practice and research: A standardized approach and protocol development can significantly reduce sedation for neonatal MRI. This study offers guidance for future research and integrated care interventions across medical teams.
期刊介绍:
Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features.
Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.