麻醉医师使用胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)激动剂的围手术期实践模式

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Meghan Brennan, Sabrina H Han, Kyle Ockerman, Sonia D Mehta, Heather J Furnas, Frederik Heath, Patricia Mars, Audrey Klenke, Sarah C Sorice-Virk
{"title":"麻醉医师使用胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)激动剂的围手术期实践模式","authors":"Meghan Brennan, Sabrina H Han, Kyle Ockerman, Sonia D Mehta, Heather J Furnas, Frederik Heath, Patricia Mars, Audrey Klenke, Sarah C Sorice-Virk","doi":"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aspiration of gastric contents during induction of anaesthesia is a rare but well-recognized complication with high morbidity and mortality risk. Patients at highest risk include those with full stomachs, diabetes, hiatal hernias, gastrointestinal obstructions, severe gastroesophageal reflux, and known delayed gastric emptying. Recently, the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has expanded rapidly, including their application in cosmetic weight loss. This drug class suppresses glucagon release after meals, thereby delaying gastric emptying over an undefined duration. For patients taking these medications in the perioperative period, the effect on overall aspiration risk is unknown. This survey details the current practice pattern of anaesthesiologists regarding GLP-1 agonists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved 30-question, uncompensated survey was distributed to 30,096 self-reported actively practicing United States members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). The survey collected demographic information, practice information, and included questions about the management of patients taking GLP-1 agonists. To ensure participant confidentiality, no identifiable information was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 5.98%, with 1,801 surveys returned. Ninety-seven percent of respondents indicated familiarity with GLP-1 agonists, and eighty-one percent indicated they had not personally witnessed complications in patients taking GLP-1 agonists. Most respondents indicated perioperative aspiration as the largest concern and the most commonly reported witnessed complication. 62% reported having \"some\" to \"a lot\" of experience providing anaesthesia to patients taking these medications. Most respondents reported NPO guidelines consistent with current ASA practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of anaesthesiologists report perioperative aspiration as their highest concern for patients taking this class of medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":23353,"journal":{"name":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","volume":"53 2","pages":"42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931257/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative Practice Patterns of Anaesthesiologists Surrounding Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonist Medications.\",\"authors\":\"Meghan Brennan, Sabrina H Han, Kyle Ockerman, Sonia D Mehta, Heather J Furnas, Frederik Heath, Patricia Mars, Audrey Klenke, Sarah C Sorice-Virk\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/TJAR.2025.241653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Aspiration of gastric contents during induction of anaesthesia is a rare but well-recognized complication with high morbidity and mortality risk. Patients at highest risk include those with full stomachs, diabetes, hiatal hernias, gastrointestinal obstructions, severe gastroesophageal reflux, and known delayed gastric emptying. Recently, the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has expanded rapidly, including their application in cosmetic weight loss. This drug class suppresses glucagon release after meals, thereby delaying gastric emptying over an undefined duration. For patients taking these medications in the perioperative period, the effect on overall aspiration risk is unknown. This survey details the current practice pattern of anaesthesiologists regarding GLP-1 agonists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An IRB-approved 30-question, uncompensated survey was distributed to 30,096 self-reported actively practicing United States members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). The survey collected demographic information, practice information, and included questions about the management of patients taking GLP-1 agonists. To ensure participant confidentiality, no identifiable information was collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 5.98%, with 1,801 surveys returned. Ninety-seven percent of respondents indicated familiarity with GLP-1 agonists, and eighty-one percent indicated they had not personally witnessed complications in patients taking GLP-1 agonists. Most respondents indicated perioperative aspiration as the largest concern and the most commonly reported witnessed complication. 62% reported having \\\"some\\\" to \\\"a lot\\\" of experience providing anaesthesia to patients taking these medications. Most respondents reported NPO guidelines consistent with current ASA practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of anaesthesiologists report perioperative aspiration as their highest concern for patients taking this class of medications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23353,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"volume\":\"53 2\",\"pages\":\"42-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11931257/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241653\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TJAR.2025.241653","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:麻醉诱导过程中胃内容物误吸是一种罕见但公认的并发症,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。高危患者包括胃饱、糖尿病、裂孔疝、胃肠道梗阻、严重胃食管反流和已知胃排空延迟的患者。最近,胰高血糖素样肽-1 (GLP-1)激动剂的使用迅速扩大,包括它们在美容减肥中的应用。这类药物抑制餐后胰高血糖素的释放,从而在不确定的时间内延缓胃排空。对于围手术期服用这些药物的患者,其对总误吸风险的影响尚不清楚。这项调查详细介绍了目前麻醉师关于GLP-1激动剂的实践模式。方法:对30096名美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)积极执业的美国会员进行了一项由irb批准的30个问题的无偿调查。该调查收集了人口统计信息、实践信息,并包括关于服用GLP-1激动剂患者管理的问题。为了确保参与者的机密性,没有收集任何可识别的信息。结果:调查回复率为5.98%,回收问卷1801份。97%的受访者表示熟悉GLP-1激动剂,81%的受访者表示他们没有亲眼目睹服用GLP-1激动剂的患者出现并发症。大多数应答者指出围手术期误吸是最大的担忧,也是最常见的并发症。62%的医生报告说,他们有“一些”到“很多”为服用这些药物的病人提供麻醉的经验。大多数答复者报告的NPO指南与现行ASA实践指南一致。结论:大多数麻醉师报告围手术期误吸是他们最关心的患者使用这类药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative Practice Patterns of Anaesthesiologists Surrounding Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Agonist Medications.

Objective: Aspiration of gastric contents during induction of anaesthesia is a rare but well-recognized complication with high morbidity and mortality risk. Patients at highest risk include those with full stomachs, diabetes, hiatal hernias, gastrointestinal obstructions, severe gastroesophageal reflux, and known delayed gastric emptying. Recently, the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has expanded rapidly, including their application in cosmetic weight loss. This drug class suppresses glucagon release after meals, thereby delaying gastric emptying over an undefined duration. For patients taking these medications in the perioperative period, the effect on overall aspiration risk is unknown. This survey details the current practice pattern of anaesthesiologists regarding GLP-1 agonists.

Methods: An IRB-approved 30-question, uncompensated survey was distributed to 30,096 self-reported actively practicing United States members of the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA). The survey collected demographic information, practice information, and included questions about the management of patients taking GLP-1 agonists. To ensure participant confidentiality, no identifiable information was collected.

Results: The survey response rate was 5.98%, with 1,801 surveys returned. Ninety-seven percent of respondents indicated familiarity with GLP-1 agonists, and eighty-one percent indicated they had not personally witnessed complications in patients taking GLP-1 agonists. Most respondents indicated perioperative aspiration as the largest concern and the most commonly reported witnessed complication. 62% reported having "some" to "a lot" of experience providing anaesthesia to patients taking these medications. Most respondents reported NPO guidelines consistent with current ASA practice guidelines.

Conclusion: The majority of anaesthesiologists report perioperative aspiration as their highest concern for patients taking this class of medications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信