健康微生物群-向功能解释迈进。

IF 11.8 2区 生物学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Kinga Zielińska, Klas I Udekwu, Witold Rudnicki, Alina Frolova, Paweł P Łabaj
{"title":"健康微生物群-向功能解释迈进。","authors":"Kinga Zielińska, Klas I Udekwu, Witold Rudnicki, Alina Frolova, Paweł P Łabaj","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microbiome-based disease prediction has significant potential as an early, noninvasive marker of multiple health conditions linked to dysbiosis of the human gut microbiota, thanks in part to decreasing sequencing and analysis costs. Microbiome health indices and other computational tools currently proposed in the field often are based on a microbiome's species richness and are completely reliant on taxonomic classification. A resurgent interest in a metabolism-centric, ecological approach has led to an increased understanding of microbiome metabolic and phenotypic complexity, revealing substantial restrictions of taxonomy-reliant approaches.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In this study, we introduce a new metagenomic health index developed as an answer to recent developments in microbiome definitions, in an effort to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy microbiomes, here in focus, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The novelty of our approach is a shift from a traditional Linnean phylogenetic classification toward a more holistic consideration of the metabolic functional potential underlining ecological interactions between species. Based on well-explored data cohorts, we compare our method and its performance with the most comprehensive indices to date, the taxonomy-based Gut Microbiome Health Index (GMHI), and the high-dimensional principal component analysis (hiPCA) methods, as well as to the standard taxon- and function-based Shannon entropy scoring. After demonstrating better performance on the initially targeted IBD cohorts, in comparison with other methods, we retrain our index on an additional 27 datasets obtained from different clinical conditions and validate our index's ability to distinguish between healthy and disease states using a variety of complementary benchmarking approaches. Finally, we demonstrate its superiority over the GMHI and the hiPCA on a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort and highlight the distinct robustness of our method to sequencing depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, we emphasize the potential of this metagenomic approach and advocate a shift toward functional approaches to better understand and assess microbiome health as well as provide directions for future index enhancements. Our method, q2-predict-dysbiosis (Q2PD), is freely available (https://github.com/Kizielins/q2-predict-dysbiosis).</p>","PeriodicalId":12581,"journal":{"name":"GigaScience","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927397/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthy microbiome-moving towards functional interpretation.\",\"authors\":\"Kinga Zielińska, Klas I Udekwu, Witold Rudnicki, Alina Frolova, Paweł P Łabaj\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gigascience/giaf015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Microbiome-based disease prediction has significant potential as an early, noninvasive marker of multiple health conditions linked to dysbiosis of the human gut microbiota, thanks in part to decreasing sequencing and analysis costs. Microbiome health indices and other computational tools currently proposed in the field often are based on a microbiome's species richness and are completely reliant on taxonomic classification. A resurgent interest in a metabolism-centric, ecological approach has led to an increased understanding of microbiome metabolic and phenotypic complexity, revealing substantial restrictions of taxonomy-reliant approaches.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In this study, we introduce a new metagenomic health index developed as an answer to recent developments in microbiome definitions, in an effort to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy microbiomes, here in focus, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The novelty of our approach is a shift from a traditional Linnean phylogenetic classification toward a more holistic consideration of the metabolic functional potential underlining ecological interactions between species. Based on well-explored data cohorts, we compare our method and its performance with the most comprehensive indices to date, the taxonomy-based Gut Microbiome Health Index (GMHI), and the high-dimensional principal component analysis (hiPCA) methods, as well as to the standard taxon- and function-based Shannon entropy scoring. After demonstrating better performance on the initially targeted IBD cohorts, in comparison with other methods, we retrain our index on an additional 27 datasets obtained from different clinical conditions and validate our index's ability to distinguish between healthy and disease states using a variety of complementary benchmarking approaches. Finally, we demonstrate its superiority over the GMHI and the hiPCA on a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort and highlight the distinct robustness of our method to sequencing depth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, we emphasize the potential of this metagenomic approach and advocate a shift toward functional approaches to better understand and assess microbiome health as well as provide directions for future index enhancements. Our method, q2-predict-dysbiosis (Q2PD), is freely available (https://github.com/Kizielins/q2-predict-dysbiosis).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GigaScience\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927397/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GigaScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf015\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GigaScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf015","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于测序和分析成本的降低,基于微生物组的疾病预测作为与人类肠道菌群失调相关的多种健康状况的早期、无创标志物具有巨大的潜力。微生物组健康指数和目前在该领域提出的其他计算工具通常是基于微生物组的物种丰富度,完全依赖于分类分类。对以代谢为中心的生态方法的重新兴趣导致对微生物组代谢和表型复杂性的理解增加,揭示了分类学依赖方法的实质性限制。在这项研究中,我们引入了一个新的宏基因组健康指数,作为对微生物组定义的最新发展的回答,努力区分健康和不健康的微生物组,这里的重点是炎症性肠病(IBD)。我们方法的新颖之处在于从传统的林奈系统发育分类向更全面地考虑物种之间生态相互作用的代谢功能潜力的转变。基于充分探索的数据队列,我们将我们的方法及其性能与迄今为止最全面的指标,基于分类学的肠道微生物组健康指数(GMHI),高维主成分分析(hiPCA)方法以及基于分类单元和功能的标准Shannon熵评分进行了比较。与其他方法相比,在最初的目标IBD队列上证明了更好的性能后,我们在另外27个来自不同临床条件的数据集上重新训练我们的索引,并使用各种互补的基准方法验证我们的索引区分健康和疾病状态的能力。最后,我们在COVID-19纵向队列中证明了其优于GMHI和hiPCA的优势,并强调了我们的方法对测序深度的独特稳健性。结论:总的来说,我们强调这种宏基因组方法的潜力,并主张向功能方法转变,以更好地理解和评估微生物组健康,并为未来的指数增强提供方向。我们的方法,q2-预测-生态失调(Q2PD),是免费的(https://github.com/Kizielins/q2-predict-dysbiosis)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthy microbiome-moving towards functional interpretation.

Background: Microbiome-based disease prediction has significant potential as an early, noninvasive marker of multiple health conditions linked to dysbiosis of the human gut microbiota, thanks in part to decreasing sequencing and analysis costs. Microbiome health indices and other computational tools currently proposed in the field often are based on a microbiome's species richness and are completely reliant on taxonomic classification. A resurgent interest in a metabolism-centric, ecological approach has led to an increased understanding of microbiome metabolic and phenotypic complexity, revealing substantial restrictions of taxonomy-reliant approaches.

Findings: In this study, we introduce a new metagenomic health index developed as an answer to recent developments in microbiome definitions, in an effort to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy microbiomes, here in focus, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The novelty of our approach is a shift from a traditional Linnean phylogenetic classification toward a more holistic consideration of the metabolic functional potential underlining ecological interactions between species. Based on well-explored data cohorts, we compare our method and its performance with the most comprehensive indices to date, the taxonomy-based Gut Microbiome Health Index (GMHI), and the high-dimensional principal component analysis (hiPCA) methods, as well as to the standard taxon- and function-based Shannon entropy scoring. After demonstrating better performance on the initially targeted IBD cohorts, in comparison with other methods, we retrain our index on an additional 27 datasets obtained from different clinical conditions and validate our index's ability to distinguish between healthy and disease states using a variety of complementary benchmarking approaches. Finally, we demonstrate its superiority over the GMHI and the hiPCA on a longitudinal COVID-19 cohort and highlight the distinct robustness of our method to sequencing depth.

Conclusions: Overall, we emphasize the potential of this metagenomic approach and advocate a shift toward functional approaches to better understand and assess microbiome health as well as provide directions for future index enhancements. Our method, q2-predict-dysbiosis (Q2PD), is freely available (https://github.com/Kizielins/q2-predict-dysbiosis).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GigaScience
GigaScience MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: GigaScience seeks to transform data dissemination and utilization in the life and biomedical sciences. As an online open-access open-data journal, it specializes in publishing "big-data" studies encompassing various fields. Its scope includes not only "omic" type data and the fields of high-throughput biology currently serviced by large public repositories, but also the growing range of more difficult-to-access data, such as imaging, neuroscience, ecology, cohort data, systems biology and other new types of large-scale shareable data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信