用于心脏鞘安全输送的机器人系统的开发与评估。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Weizhao Wang, Carlo Saija, Zhouyang Xu, Aya Zeidan, Joshua Wilcox, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood, Shuangyi Wang, Kawal Rhode, Richard Housden
{"title":"用于心脏鞘安全输送的机器人系统的开发与评估。","authors":"Weizhao Wang, Carlo Saija, Zhouyang Xu, Aya Zeidan, Joshua Wilcox, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood, Shuangyi Wang, Kawal Rhode, Richard Housden","doi":"10.1109/TBME.2025.3553014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a 3-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robotic system for the safe delivery of cardiac sheaths through challenging anatomical structures, including the fossa ovalis and pathways with tight curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The robot and its kinematic model were built on a previously proposed single-DoF actuation module and bending model. A sheath delivery strategy (SDS) was developed, combining two control methods: tip position control to approach an optimal entry point and point-constrained control to maintain consistent navigation through this point, minimizing tissue contact. Technical performance was evaluated through trajectory-following and point-crossing tests, followed by feasibility experiments in a simulated scenario. Trials were conducted by three cardiologists using a validated phantom model under fluoroscopic guidance, comparing SDS with joint control (JC) and manual control (MC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average root mean square errors were 2.10 mm for tip position control and 1.86 mm for point-constrained control. SDS outperformed MC with significantly shorter trajectory lengths and lower root mean square jerk. Compared to JC, SDS reduced sheath-induced movements (an indirect measure of force) and increased retraction success rates at the fossa ovalis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed robotic system reduced tissue wall contact compared to JC and provided smoother, more controlled operations than MC, ensuring safer and more effective delivery through confined pathways.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This work contributes to advancing robotic-assisted cardiac sheath delivery, providing a reliable and safer method for navigating challenging anatomical structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13245,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Evaluation of a Robotic System for Safe Cardiac Sheath Delivery.\",\"authors\":\"Weizhao Wang, Carlo Saija, Zhouyang Xu, Aya Zeidan, Joshua Wilcox, Tiffany Patterson, Simon Redwood, Shuangyi Wang, Kawal Rhode, Richard Housden\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TBME.2025.3553014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop and evaluate a 3-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robotic system for the safe delivery of cardiac sheaths through challenging anatomical structures, including the fossa ovalis and pathways with tight curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The robot and its kinematic model were built on a previously proposed single-DoF actuation module and bending model. A sheath delivery strategy (SDS) was developed, combining two control methods: tip position control to approach an optimal entry point and point-constrained control to maintain consistent navigation through this point, minimizing tissue contact. Technical performance was evaluated through trajectory-following and point-crossing tests, followed by feasibility experiments in a simulated scenario. Trials were conducted by three cardiologists using a validated phantom model under fluoroscopic guidance, comparing SDS with joint control (JC) and manual control (MC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average root mean square errors were 2.10 mm for tip position control and 1.86 mm for point-constrained control. SDS outperformed MC with significantly shorter trajectory lengths and lower root mean square jerk. Compared to JC, SDS reduced sheath-induced movements (an indirect measure of force) and increased retraction success rates at the fossa ovalis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed robotic system reduced tissue wall contact compared to JC and provided smoother, more controlled operations than MC, ensuring safer and more effective delivery through confined pathways.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This work contributes to advancing robotic-assisted cardiac sheath delivery, providing a reliable and safer method for navigating challenging anatomical structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"PP \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3553014\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2025.3553014","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在开发和评估一种3自由度(DoF)机器人系统,用于通过具有挑战性的解剖结构(包括卵圆窝和具有紧密曲线的通路)安全递送心脏鞘。方法:在先前提出的单自由度驱动模块和弯曲模型的基础上建立机器人及其运动学模型。开发了一种鞘输送策略(SDS),结合了两种控制方法:尖端位置控制以接近最佳入口点,以及点约束控制以保持通过该点的一致导航,最大限度地减少组织接触。通过轨迹跟踪和点交叉测试来评估技术性能,然后在模拟场景中进行可行性实验。试验由三位心脏病专家在透视引导下使用经过验证的幻影模型进行,将SDS与关节控制(JC)和手动控制(MC)进行比较。结果:针尖位置控制的均方根误差为2.10 mm,点约束控制的均方根误差为1.86 mm。SDS以更短的轨迹长度和更低的均方根差显著优于MC。与JC相比,SDS减少了鞘诱导的运动(一种间接测量力的方法),增加了卵圆窝的牵入成功率。结论:与JC相比,该机器人系统减少了与组织壁的接触,提供了比MC更平稳、更可控的操作,确保了更安全、更有效地通过受限路径进行输送。意义:这项工作有助于推进机器人辅助心脏鞘输送,为具有挑战性的解剖结构导航提供可靠和更安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Evaluation of a Robotic System for Safe Cardiac Sheath Delivery.

Objective: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a 3-degree-of-freedom (DoF) robotic system for the safe delivery of cardiac sheaths through challenging anatomical structures, including the fossa ovalis and pathways with tight curves.

Methods: The robot and its kinematic model were built on a previously proposed single-DoF actuation module and bending model. A sheath delivery strategy (SDS) was developed, combining two control methods: tip position control to approach an optimal entry point and point-constrained control to maintain consistent navigation through this point, minimizing tissue contact. Technical performance was evaluated through trajectory-following and point-crossing tests, followed by feasibility experiments in a simulated scenario. Trials were conducted by three cardiologists using a validated phantom model under fluoroscopic guidance, comparing SDS with joint control (JC) and manual control (MC).

Results: Average root mean square errors were 2.10 mm for tip position control and 1.86 mm for point-constrained control. SDS outperformed MC with significantly shorter trajectory lengths and lower root mean square jerk. Compared to JC, SDS reduced sheath-induced movements (an indirect measure of force) and increased retraction success rates at the fossa ovalis.

Conclusion: The proposed robotic system reduced tissue wall contact compared to JC and provided smoother, more controlled operations than MC, ensuring safer and more effective delivery through confined pathways.

Significance: This work contributes to advancing robotic-assisted cardiac sheath delivery, providing a reliable and safer method for navigating challenging anatomical structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
880
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering contains basic and applied papers dealing with biomedical engineering. Papers range from engineering development in methods and techniques with biomedical applications to experimental and clinical investigations with engineering contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信