Atousa Akhgar, Amirreza Mazidabadi Farahani, Hamideh Akbari, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Mohammad Jalili, Hadi Mirfazaelian
{"title":"蒸汽冷却剂喷雾和局部麻醉乳膏（利多卡因-普拉西卡因）对静脉插管疼痛的疗效比较：一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Atousa Akhgar, Amirreza Mazidabadi Farahani, Hamideh Akbari, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Mohammad Jalili, Hadi Mirfazaelian","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-214479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intravenous cannulation is a routine procedure in the ED. Different methods are being used to reduce the pain of intravenous cannulation. Among them, there are studies which have shown the efficacy of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine-prilocaine combination topical cream. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these methods in pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a randomised clinical trial study including adult (18-65 year) patients admitted to the ED of an academic hospital in Iran between February 2024 and May 2024 and who required peripheral intravenous catheter. Patients were assigned randomly to vapocoolant spray or lidocaine-prilocaine cream. The spray was applied for 30 s immediately before intravenous cannulation and the cream 45 min before intravenous cannulation. Patients' pain scores were assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) immediately after cannulation along with adverse effects. Patients' willingness to use the same anaesthetic method was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>This study included 77 patients; median age was 39 (IQR: 29.75-55.39) and 48% were men. The median cannulation pain score was 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the vapocoolant group and 3 (IQR: 2-3) in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group (p value=0.09). Overall, adverse events occurred in 24 (31%) patients; 21 patients in the lidocaine-prilocaine group experienced transient paleness (p value=0.03). 33 (43%) patients who received vapocoolant and 21 (27%) patients who used the cream selected to use their assigned method again (p value=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the vapocoolant spray was not statistically more effective than lidocaine-prilocaine cream in pain reduction during intravenous cannulation. Although all these side effects were generally considered clinically insignificant, the spray group exhibited significantly fewer side effects compared with the cream group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04473820.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"373-377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of vapocoolant spray and topical anaesthetic cream (lidocaine-prilocaine) on pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Atousa Akhgar, Amirreza Mazidabadi Farahani, Hamideh Akbari, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Mohammad Jalili, Hadi Mirfazaelian\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-214479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intravenous cannulation is a routine procedure in the ED. Different methods are being used to reduce the pain of intravenous cannulation. Among them, there are studies which have shown the efficacy of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine-prilocaine combination topical cream. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these methods in pain management.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a randomised clinical trial study including adult (18-65 year) patients admitted to the ED of an academic hospital in Iran between February 2024 and May 2024 and who required peripheral intravenous catheter. Patients were assigned randomly to vapocoolant spray or lidocaine-prilocaine cream. The spray was applied for 30 s immediately before intravenous cannulation and the cream 45 min before intravenous cannulation. Patients' pain scores were assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) immediately after cannulation along with adverse effects. Patients' willingness to use the same anaesthetic method was also recorded.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>This study included 77 patients; median age was 39 (IQR: 29.75-55.39) and 48% were men. The median cannulation pain score was 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the vapocoolant group and 3 (IQR: 2-3) in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group (p value=0.09). Overall, adverse events occurred in 24 (31%) patients; 21 patients in the lidocaine-prilocaine group experienced transient paleness (p value=0.03). 33 (43%) patients who received vapocoolant and 21 (27%) patients who used the cream selected to use their assigned method again (p value=0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the vapocoolant spray was not statistically more effective than lidocaine-prilocaine cream in pain reduction during intravenous cannulation. Although all these side effects were generally considered clinically insignificant, the spray group exhibited significantly fewer side effects compared with the cream group.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04473820.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"373-377\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214479\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-214479","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of the effects of vapocoolant spray and topical anaesthetic cream (lidocaine-prilocaine) on pain of intravenous cannulation: a randomised controlled trial.
Objective: Intravenous cannulation is a routine procedure in the ED. Different methods are being used to reduce the pain of intravenous cannulation. Among them, there are studies which have shown the efficacy of vapocoolant spray and lidocaine-prilocaine combination topical cream. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of these methods in pain management.
Method: This was a randomised clinical trial study including adult (18-65 year) patients admitted to the ED of an academic hospital in Iran between February 2024 and May 2024 and who required peripheral intravenous catheter. Patients were assigned randomly to vapocoolant spray or lidocaine-prilocaine cream. The spray was applied for 30 s immediately before intravenous cannulation and the cream 45 min before intravenous cannulation. Patients' pain scores were assessed by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) immediately after cannulation along with adverse effects. Patients' willingness to use the same anaesthetic method was also recorded.
Result: This study included 77 patients; median age was 39 (IQR: 29.75-55.39) and 48% were men. The median cannulation pain score was 2 (IQR: 2-3) in the vapocoolant group and 3 (IQR: 2-3) in the lidocaine-prilocaine cream group (p value=0.09). Overall, adverse events occurred in 24 (31%) patients; 21 patients in the lidocaine-prilocaine group experienced transient paleness (p value=0.03). 33 (43%) patients who received vapocoolant and 21 (27%) patients who used the cream selected to use their assigned method again (p value=0.02).
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the vapocoolant spray was not statistically more effective than lidocaine-prilocaine cream in pain reduction during intravenous cannulation. Although all these side effects were generally considered clinically insignificant, the spray group exhibited significantly fewer side effects compared with the cream group.
期刊介绍：
The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
