使用可穿戴设备定制抗癫痫治疗:一项针对缺席癫痫的概念验证研究。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-03-21 DOI:10.1111/epi.18384
Jaiver Macea, Christos Chatzichristos, Miguel Bhagubai, Maarten De Vos, Wim Van Paesschen
{"title":"使用可穿戴设备定制抗癫痫治疗:一项针对缺席癫痫的概念验证研究。","authors":"Jaiver Macea, Christos Chatzichristos, Miguel Bhagubai, Maarten De Vos, Wim Van Paesschen","doi":"10.1111/epi.18384","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Typical absence seizures are underreported. We aimed to improve patient care using a wearable electroencephalograph (wEEG) at home and assess a machine learning (ML) pipeline for absence detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with typical absences used a wEEG device 12-24 h 1 week after antiseizure medication (ASM) adjustments. Three-hertz generalized spike-wave discharges (SWDs) ≥ 3 s were used as absence surrogates. After manual inspection, we used the results to guide medical treatment. The outcomes were seizure freedom, number of consecutive measurements without relapse, and side effects. Afterward, we used the ML pipeline on the recordings, and a neurologist reviewed the output. Review time and diagnostic performance were compared with manual inspection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients (12 female, median age = 24 years) were followed for a median of 5 months (range = 1-12). The median recording time for each session was 21.3 h (range = 10-24). Fifteen patients (79%) were seizure-free during the last measurement, including seven of 11 (63%) diagnosed with refractory epilepsy. Ten patients relapsed after a median of 1-2 recordings (range = 1-6) without 3-Hz SWDs. Side effects occurred in 21% of patients. Manual file inspection identified 806 3-Hz SWDs of ≥3 s. The ML pipeline reduced a neurologist's median review time for 24-h wEEG from 27 (range = 10-45) to 4.3 min (range = .1-10), with a sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and false positives per hour of .8, .95, .87, and .007, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Home-based wEEG allows patient monitoring after ASM adjustments, improving absence seizure management. The ML-based pipeline performed well and was crucial in reducing review time.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tailoring antiseizure treatment with a wearable device: A proof-of-concept study in absence epilepsy.\",\"authors\":\"Jaiver Macea, Christos Chatzichristos, Miguel Bhagubai, Maarten De Vos, Wim Van Paesschen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18384\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Typical absence seizures are underreported. We aimed to improve patient care using a wearable electroencephalograph (wEEG) at home and assess a machine learning (ML) pipeline for absence detection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with typical absences used a wEEG device 12-24 h 1 week after antiseizure medication (ASM) adjustments. Three-hertz generalized spike-wave discharges (SWDs) ≥ 3 s were used as absence surrogates. After manual inspection, we used the results to guide medical treatment. The outcomes were seizure freedom, number of consecutive measurements without relapse, and side effects. Afterward, we used the ML pipeline on the recordings, and a neurologist reviewed the output. Review time and diagnostic performance were compared with manual inspection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nineteen patients (12 female, median age = 24 years) were followed for a median of 5 months (range = 1-12). The median recording time for each session was 21.3 h (range = 10-24). Fifteen patients (79%) were seizure-free during the last measurement, including seven of 11 (63%) diagnosed with refractory epilepsy. Ten patients relapsed after a median of 1-2 recordings (range = 1-6) without 3-Hz SWDs. Side effects occurred in 21% of patients. Manual file inspection identified 806 3-Hz SWDs of ≥3 s. The ML pipeline reduced a neurologist's median review time for 24-h wEEG from 27 (range = 10-45) to 4.3 min (range = .1-10), with a sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and false positives per hour of .8, .95, .87, and .007, respectively.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Home-based wEEG allows patient monitoring after ASM adjustments, improving absence seizure management. The ML-based pipeline performed well and was crucial in reducing review time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18384\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18384","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:典型的失神发作少报。我们的目标是在家中使用可穿戴脑电图仪(wEEG)改善患者护理,并评估机器学习(ML)管道用于缺位检测。方法:典型缺席患者在抗癫痫药物(ASM)调整后1周12-24 h使用wEEG装置。3赫兹广义尖峰波放电(SWDs)≥3 s作为缺席替代。人工检查后,我们用结果来指导医疗。结果是癫痫发作无复发、连续测量次数和副作用。之后,我们在录音上使用ML管道,并由神经学家检查输出。对人工检查的复查时间和诊断性能进行了比较。结果:19例患者(12例女性,中位年龄24岁)随访时间中位数为5个月(范围1-12)。每次会话的中位记录时间为21.3小时(范围= 10-24)。15名患者(79%)在最后一次测量中没有癫痫发作,其中11名患者中有7名(63%)被诊断为难治性癫痫。10例患者在中位1-2次记录(范围= 1-6)后复发,无3hz SWDs。21%的患者出现了副作用。手动文件检查发现806个3hz swd≥3s。ML管道将神经科医生24小时wEEG的中位检查时间从27分钟(范围= 10-45分钟)减少到4.3分钟(范围= 0.1 -10分钟),每小时的灵敏度、精度、f1评分和假阳性分别为0.8、0.95、0.87和0.007。意义:基于家庭的wEEG可以监测ASM调整后的患者,改善癫痫发作的管理。基于ml的管道表现良好,在减少审查时间方面至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tailoring antiseizure treatment with a wearable device: A proof-of-concept study in absence epilepsy.

Objective: Typical absence seizures are underreported. We aimed to improve patient care using a wearable electroencephalograph (wEEG) at home and assess a machine learning (ML) pipeline for absence detection.

Methods: Patients with typical absences used a wEEG device 12-24 h 1 week after antiseizure medication (ASM) adjustments. Three-hertz generalized spike-wave discharges (SWDs) ≥ 3 s were used as absence surrogates. After manual inspection, we used the results to guide medical treatment. The outcomes were seizure freedom, number of consecutive measurements without relapse, and side effects. Afterward, we used the ML pipeline on the recordings, and a neurologist reviewed the output. Review time and diagnostic performance were compared with manual inspection.

Results: Nineteen patients (12 female, median age = 24 years) were followed for a median of 5 months (range = 1-12). The median recording time for each session was 21.3 h (range = 10-24). Fifteen patients (79%) were seizure-free during the last measurement, including seven of 11 (63%) diagnosed with refractory epilepsy. Ten patients relapsed after a median of 1-2 recordings (range = 1-6) without 3-Hz SWDs. Side effects occurred in 21% of patients. Manual file inspection identified 806 3-Hz SWDs of ≥3 s. The ML pipeline reduced a neurologist's median review time for 24-h wEEG from 27 (range = 10-45) to 4.3 min (range = .1-10), with a sensitivity, precision, F1-score, and false positives per hour of .8, .95, .87, and .007, respectively.

Significance: Home-based wEEG allows patient monitoring after ASM adjustments, improving absence seizure management. The ML-based pipeline performed well and was crucial in reducing review time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信