利用无组织表观基因组测定法检测循环肿瘤 DNA 是早期三阴性乳腺癌的高度预后生物标志物

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Foluso O. Ademuyiwa, Cynthia X. Ma, Katherine Weilbaecher, Rama Suresh, Lindsay L. Peterson, Ron Bose, Nusayba Bagegni, Caron E. Rigden, Ashley Frith, Katherine Clifton, Derek Dustin, Mingyang Cai, Liyang Xiong, Sai Chen, Andrew Davis
{"title":"利用无组织表观基因组测定法检测循环肿瘤 DNA 是早期三阴性乳腺癌的高度预后生物标志物","authors":"Foluso O. Ademuyiwa, Cynthia X. Ma, Katherine Weilbaecher, Rama Suresh, Lindsay L. Peterson, Ron Bose, Nusayba Bagegni, Caron E. Rigden, Ashley Frith, Katherine Clifton, Derek Dustin, Mingyang Cai, Liyang Xiong, Sai Chen, Andrew Davis","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Clinical tools to monitor treatment response and metastatic risk could improve early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care. While molecular residual disease (MRD) assays show promise, their use in the neoadjuvant setting requires rapid turnaround times. Tissue-informed approaches may be challenging for patients with limited biopsy samples. The objectives were to determine the surveillance sensitivity for detecting metastatic recurrence and evaluate the ctDNA response to neoadjuvant therapy using a tissue-free epigenomic assay. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II or III TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on a clinical trial (NCT02124902) followed by surgery with or without adjuvant therapy were included in this study. Blood samples were prospectively collected prior to, during, and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and after surgery at pre-specified surveillance time points. Plasma samples were analyzed by Guardant Reveal. Results: A total of 119 TNBC patients were included in the analysis. ctDNA was detected in the post-surgical setting in 8.9% (7/79) of patients, with an 83% (5/6) patient-level surveillance sensitivity for metastatic recurrence and 99.5% (197/198) sample-level specificity. Post-surgical ctDNA detection was prognostic for shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI; HR 37.7, p<0.0001). ctDNA detection at the post-NAT pre-surgical time point was also associated with shorter RFI in patients with residual disease at surgery (HR 28.2, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In early-stage TNBC patients, a tissue-free, epigenomic assay and demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for metastatic recurrence. ctDNA detection in the neoadjuvant setting indicated poor prognosis, highlighting its potential role across breast cancer care.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of circulating tumor DNA using a tissue-free epigenomic assay is a highly prognostic biomarker in early-stage triple negative breast cancer\",\"authors\":\"Foluso O. Ademuyiwa, Cynthia X. Ma, Katherine Weilbaecher, Rama Suresh, Lindsay L. Peterson, Ron Bose, Nusayba Bagegni, Caron E. Rigden, Ashley Frith, Katherine Clifton, Derek Dustin, Mingyang Cai, Liyang Xiong, Sai Chen, Andrew Davis\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Clinical tools to monitor treatment response and metastatic risk could improve early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care. While molecular residual disease (MRD) assays show promise, their use in the neoadjuvant setting requires rapid turnaround times. Tissue-informed approaches may be challenging for patients with limited biopsy samples. The objectives were to determine the surveillance sensitivity for detecting metastatic recurrence and evaluate the ctDNA response to neoadjuvant therapy using a tissue-free epigenomic assay. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II or III TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on a clinical trial (NCT02124902) followed by surgery with or without adjuvant therapy were included in this study. Blood samples were prospectively collected prior to, during, and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and after surgery at pre-specified surveillance time points. Plasma samples were analyzed by Guardant Reveal. Results: A total of 119 TNBC patients were included in the analysis. ctDNA was detected in the post-surgical setting in 8.9% (7/79) of patients, with an 83% (5/6) patient-level surveillance sensitivity for metastatic recurrence and 99.5% (197/198) sample-level specificity. Post-surgical ctDNA detection was prognostic for shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI; HR 37.7, p<0.0001). ctDNA detection at the post-NAT pre-surgical time point was also associated with shorter RFI in patients with residual disease at surgery (HR 28.2, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In early-stage TNBC patients, a tissue-free, epigenomic assay and demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for metastatic recurrence. ctDNA detection in the neoadjuvant setting indicated poor prognosis, highlighting its potential role across breast cancer care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":\"92 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3145\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-3145","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detection of circulating tumor DNA using a tissue-free epigenomic assay is a highly prognostic biomarker in early-stage triple negative breast cancer
Purpose: Clinical tools to monitor treatment response and metastatic risk could improve early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) care. While molecular residual disease (MRD) assays show promise, their use in the neoadjuvant setting requires rapid turnaround times. Tissue-informed approaches may be challenging for patients with limited biopsy samples. The objectives were to determine the surveillance sensitivity for detecting metastatic recurrence and evaluate the ctDNA response to neoadjuvant therapy using a tissue-free epigenomic assay. Patients and Methods: Patients with stage II or III TNBC undergoing neoadjuvant docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy on a clinical trial (NCT02124902) followed by surgery with or without adjuvant therapy were included in this study. Blood samples were prospectively collected prior to, during, and after completion of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), and after surgery at pre-specified surveillance time points. Plasma samples were analyzed by Guardant Reveal. Results: A total of 119 TNBC patients were included in the analysis. ctDNA was detected in the post-surgical setting in 8.9% (7/79) of patients, with an 83% (5/6) patient-level surveillance sensitivity for metastatic recurrence and 99.5% (197/198) sample-level specificity. Post-surgical ctDNA detection was prognostic for shorter recurrence-free interval (RFI; HR 37.7, p<0.0001). ctDNA detection at the post-NAT pre-surgical time point was also associated with shorter RFI in patients with residual disease at surgery (HR 28.2, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In early-stage TNBC patients, a tissue-free, epigenomic assay and demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for metastatic recurrence. ctDNA detection in the neoadjuvant setting indicated poor prognosis, highlighting its potential role across breast cancer care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信