嗜酸性筋膜炎的治疗和监测。

Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás, Albert Gil-Vila, Alfredo Guillen-Del Castillo, Ana Matas-García, Jose Cesar Milisenda, Carmen Pilar Simeon-Aznar, Iago Pinal-Fernandez
{"title":"嗜酸性筋膜炎的治疗和监测。","authors":"Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás, Albert Gil-Vila, Alfredo Guillen-Del Castillo, Ana Matas-García, Jose Cesar Milisenda, Carmen Pilar Simeon-Aznar, Iago Pinal-Fernandez","doi":"10.1007/s40674-024-00222-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientific societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the effectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifically POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientific quality of observational studies and consensus about \"activity\", \"sequela\", \"relapse\" or \"refractoriness\" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information.</p>","PeriodicalId":520385,"journal":{"name":"Current treatment options in rheumatology","volume":"11 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922073/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.\",\"authors\":\"Albert Selva-O'Callaghan, Ernesto Trallero-Araguás, Albert Gil-Vila, Alfredo Guillen-Del Castillo, Ana Matas-García, Jose Cesar Milisenda, Carmen Pilar Simeon-Aznar, Iago Pinal-Fernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40674-024-00222-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientific societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the effectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifically POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientific quality of observational studies and consensus about \\\"activity\\\", \\\"sequela\\\", \\\"relapse\\\" or \\\"refractoriness\\\" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current treatment options in rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922073/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current treatment options in rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-024-00222-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current treatment options in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40674-024-00222-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

回顾目的:嗜酸性筋膜炎(EF)是一种罕见的炎症性疾病,其特征是皮肤硬化。尽管存在一些科学协会的指导方针,但缺乏关于监测和治疗的标准建议。最近的发现:目前诊断为EF的患者的治疗包括糖皮质激素加至少一种免疫抑制药物在复发或难治性疾病的情况下。甲氨蝶呤和霉酚酸酯是最推荐的,尽管最近有大量的病例报告或小系列报道了生物制剂或JAK抑制剂治疗复发或难治性疾病的有效性。抗il - 5可能在那些罕见的顽固性嗜酸性粒细胞增多症中起作用。静脉注射免疫球蛋白和光置换(在那些有经验的中心)可以作为辅助治疗。监测疾病活动是确定治疗是否有效的基础。MRI, PET/TC,特别是POCUS最近证明了它们在评估治疗反应方面的价值。总结:EF缺乏关注治疗和监测的高质量数据。提高观察性研究的科学质量,并就EF患者的“活动性”、“后遗症”、“复发”或“难治性”等术语达成共识,是实施前瞻性临床试验和产生循证医学的必要策略。同时,我们必须处理现有的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis.

Purpose of review: Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare inflammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientific societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking.

Recent findings: Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the effectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifically POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response.

Summary: High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientific quality of observational studies and consensus about "activity", "sequela", "relapse" or "refractoriness" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信