Jeppe B Rosenbæk, Line B Dalgaard, Anne Grauballe, Stella J Wilfred, Mikkel W Ibsen, Lene R Madsen
{"title":"老年髋部骨折患者骨质疏松症的系统院内筛查和治疗。","authors":"Jeppe B Rosenbæk, Line B Dalgaard, Anne Grauballe, Stella J Wilfred, Mikkel W Ibsen, Lene R Madsen","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for not receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (n = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic in-hospital screening and treatment for osteoporosis in a geriatric population with hip fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Jeppe B Rosenbæk, Line B Dalgaard, Anne Grauballe, Stella J Wilfred, Mikkel W Ibsen, Lene R Madsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for not receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (n = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic in-hospital screening and treatment for osteoporosis in a geriatric population with hip fractures.
Background: Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.
Objectives: To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.
Methods: We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.
Results: In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for not receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (n = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.
Conclusion: Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.