Jeppe B. Rosenbæk PhD, Line B. Dalgaard PhD, Anne Grauballe MD, Stella J. Wilfred MD, Mikkel W. Ibsen MD, Lene R. Madsen PhD
{"title":"老年髋部骨折患者骨质疏松症的系统院内筛查和治疗。","authors":"Jeppe B. Rosenbæk PhD, Line B. Dalgaard PhD, Anne Grauballe MD, Stella J. Wilfred MD, Mikkel W. Ibsen MD, Lene R. Madsen PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for <i>not</i> receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (<i>n</i> = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 9","pages":"935-942"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.70036","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic in-hospital screening and treatment for osteoporosis in a geriatric population with hip fractures\",\"authors\":\"Jeppe B. Rosenbæk PhD, Line B. Dalgaard PhD, Anne Grauballe MD, Stella J. Wilfred MD, Mikkel W. Ibsen MD, Lene R. Madsen PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhm.70036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for <i>not</i> receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (<i>n</i> = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"volume\":\"20 9\",\"pages\":\"935-942\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.70036\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.70036\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://shmpublications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.70036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematic in-hospital screening and treatment for osteoporosis in a geriatric population with hip fractures
Background
Low-trauma fractures of the hip signify osteoporosis and increase the risk of a second fracture. However, screening for secondary osteoporosis and initiating osteoporosis treatment can be challenging in a geriatric population.
Objectives
To investigate an in-hospital approach to secure treatment, screening and follow-up of osteoporosis.
Methods
We evaluated the feasibility of a clinical approach to osteoporosis treatment with in-hospital zoledronic acid (ZOL) infusion, screening for secondary osteoporosis, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) with a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) in a cohort of 128 patients. We compared this cohort to a historic cohort of 135 patients, where screening and treatment were provided by general practice.
Results
In the intervention cohort, 58% of the patients received anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months of admission. Forty-eight patients (38%) received ZOL during admission, while nine continued their usual treatment. An additional 17 patients received ZOL or another anti-osteoporosis treatment within 6 months. The most common reasons for not receiving ZOL were vitamin D deficiency (24%) and renal impairment (7%). In total, 35% (n = 43) had a DXA within 6 months of admission; VFA revealed nine cases of vertebral fractures. Screening for secondary osteoporosis revealed vitamin D deficiency with and without secondary hyperparathyroidism (48%) and subclinical hyperthyroidism (8%) as the most common findings. Together, biochemical screening and VFA changed the treatment strategy in less than five cases.
Conclusion
Administering ZOL in-hospital following a hip fracture in combination with a systematic follow-up secured treatment in 6 out of 10 patients. However, compliance with DXA was low, which might not be of major concern, since DXA only individualized treatment in a few patients.
期刊介绍:
JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children.
Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.