内镜乳头切除术中不完全切除风险评分的开发和验证:PANETH评分。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Cecilia Binda, Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Fabbri, Massimiliano Mutignani, Andrea Tringali, Roberto Di Mitri, Alessandro Fugazza, Romano Sassatelli, Armando Gabbrielli, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Chiara Coluccio, Marco Di Marco, Cristiano Spada, Alberto Fantin, Claudio De Angelis, Raffaele Macchiarelli, Francesco Perri, Mauro Manno, Luigi Cugia, Alessandro Mussetto, Alessandro Repici, Ilaria Tarantino, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, i-EUS group
{"title":"内镜乳头切除术中不完全切除风险评分的开发和验证:PANETH评分。","authors":"Cecilia Binda,&nbsp;Antonio Facciorusso,&nbsp;Stefano Fabbri,&nbsp;Massimiliano Mutignani,&nbsp;Andrea Tringali,&nbsp;Roberto Di Mitri,&nbsp;Alessandro Fugazza,&nbsp;Romano Sassatelli,&nbsp;Armando Gabbrielli,&nbsp;Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono,&nbsp;Francesco Maria Di Matteo,&nbsp;Chiara Coluccio,&nbsp;Marco Di Marco,&nbsp;Cristiano Spada,&nbsp;Alberto Fantin,&nbsp;Claudio De Angelis,&nbsp;Raffaele Macchiarelli,&nbsp;Francesco Perri,&nbsp;Mauro Manno,&nbsp;Luigi Cugia,&nbsp;Alessandro Mussetto,&nbsp;Alessandro Repici,&nbsp;Ilaria Tarantino,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Carlo Fabbri,&nbsp;i-EUS group","doi":"10.1111/den.15005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; <i>P</i> = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; <i>P</i> = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 7","pages":"749-757"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a risk score for incomplete resection during endoscopic papillectomy: PANETH score\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Binda,&nbsp;Antonio Facciorusso,&nbsp;Stefano Fabbri,&nbsp;Massimiliano Mutignani,&nbsp;Andrea Tringali,&nbsp;Roberto Di Mitri,&nbsp;Alessandro Fugazza,&nbsp;Romano Sassatelli,&nbsp;Armando Gabbrielli,&nbsp;Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono,&nbsp;Francesco Maria Di Matteo,&nbsp;Chiara Coluccio,&nbsp;Marco Di Marco,&nbsp;Cristiano Spada,&nbsp;Alberto Fantin,&nbsp;Claudio De Angelis,&nbsp;Raffaele Macchiarelli,&nbsp;Francesco Perri,&nbsp;Mauro Manno,&nbsp;Luigi Cugia,&nbsp;Alessandro Mussetto,&nbsp;Alessandro Repici,&nbsp;Ilaria Tarantino,&nbsp;Andrea Anderloni,&nbsp;Carlo Fabbri,&nbsp;i-EUS group\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; <i>P</i> = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; <i>P</i> = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 7\",\"pages\":\"749-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内镜下乳头切除术(EP)是壶腹腺瘤的金标准治疗方法。然而,EP仍然受到不可忽视的不完全切除率(IR)的影响。不同的预测因素与较高的IR率有关,但这些因素之间的相互作用仍不清楚。本研究的目的是开发一种评分系统(以下称为PANETH评分),能够量化EP后IR的风险。方法:纳入2016-2021年在意大利19个中心接受EP治疗的患者。IR被定义为EP后在外侧或壶腹内边缘存在残留肿瘤。IR的预测因子通过逻辑回归进行分析,并用于获得易于使用的数字评分。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评价模型的性能,并通过10倍交叉验证进行检验。结果:共纳入430例患者。多因素分析:肿瘤向外侧扩散(优势比[OR] 5.81, 3.21-7.65;P = 0.02),导管内延伸(OR 6.92, 3.33-9.87;结论:提出的PANETH评分可能是预测EP后IR风险的可靠且易于应用的工具,以优化患者选择和风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a risk score for incomplete resection during endoscopic papillectomy: PANETH score

Objectives

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.

Methods

Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.

Results

A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; P = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; P < 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; P = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (P < 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.

Conclusions

The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Endoscopy
Digestive Endoscopy 医学-外科
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
291
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信