Cecilia Binda, Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Fabbri, Massimiliano Mutignani, Andrea Tringali, Roberto Di Mitri, Alessandro Fugazza, Romano Sassatelli, Armando Gabbrielli, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Chiara Coluccio, Marco Di Marco, Cristiano Spada, Alberto Fantin, Claudio De Angelis, Raffaele Macchiarelli, Francesco Perri, Mauro Manno, Luigi Cugia, Alessandro Mussetto, Alessandro Repici, Ilaria Tarantino, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, i-EUS group
{"title":"内镜乳头切除术中不完全切除风险评分的开发和验证:PANETH评分。","authors":"Cecilia Binda, Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Fabbri, Massimiliano Mutignani, Andrea Tringali, Roberto Di Mitri, Alessandro Fugazza, Romano Sassatelli, Armando Gabbrielli, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Chiara Coluccio, Marco Di Marco, Cristiano Spada, Alberto Fantin, Claudio De Angelis, Raffaele Macchiarelli, Francesco Perri, Mauro Manno, Luigi Cugia, Alessandro Mussetto, Alessandro Repici, Ilaria Tarantino, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, i-EUS group","doi":"10.1111/den.15005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; <i>P</i> = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; <i>P</i> = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":159,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Endoscopy","volume":"37 7","pages":"749-757"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a risk score for incomplete resection during endoscopic papillectomy: PANETH score\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Binda, Antonio Facciorusso, Stefano Fabbri, Massimiliano Mutignani, Andrea Tringali, Roberto Di Mitri, Alessandro Fugazza, Romano Sassatelli, Armando Gabbrielli, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Francesco Maria Di Matteo, Chiara Coluccio, Marco Di Marco, Cristiano Spada, Alberto Fantin, Claudio De Angelis, Raffaele Macchiarelli, Francesco Perri, Mauro Manno, Luigi Cugia, Alessandro Mussetto, Alessandro Repici, Ilaria Tarantino, Andrea Anderloni, Carlo Fabbri, i-EUS group\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/den.15005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; <i>P</i> = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; <i>P</i> < 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; <i>P</i> = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"37 7\",\"pages\":\"749-757\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.15005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development and validation of a risk score for incomplete resection during endoscopic papillectomy: PANETH score
Objectives
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is the gold standard treatment for ampullary adenomas. However, EP is still burdened by a nonnegligible rate of incomplete resections (IR). Different predictors have been linked to higher rates of IR, but the interaction between these factors is still unclear. The aim of the study was to develop a scoring system (hereby called PANETH score) able to quantify the risk of IR after EP.
Methods
Patients who underwent EP in 19 Italian centers in 2016–2021 were included. IR was defined as the presence of residual tumor in lateral or endoampullary margins after EP. Predictors for IR were analyzed by logistic regression and were used to obtain an easy-to-use numeric score. The performance of the model was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and tested by means of 10-fold cross-validation.
Results
A total of 430 patients were included. On multivariate analysis, laterally spreading tumor (odds ratio [OR] 5.81, 3.21–7.65; P = 0.02), intraductal extension (OR 6.92, 3.33–9.87; P < 0.0001), and bile duct dilation (OR 2.61, 1.22–4.32; P = 0.004) were significant predictors of IR. The score was calculated by the sum of regression coefficients of each predictor. A ≥3 score indicated a 4-fold risk of IR (P < 0.0001). The internal validation resulted in an area under the curve of 0.83 and an overall error rate of 0.11.
Conclusions
The proposed PANETH score may represent a reliable and easily applicable tool to predict the risk of IR after EP to optimize patient selection and risk stratification.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Endoscopy (DEN) is the official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, the Asian Pacific Society for Digestive Endoscopy and the World Endoscopy Organization. Digestive Endoscopy serves as a medium for presenting original articles that offer significant contributions to knowledge in the broad field of endoscopy. The Journal also includes Reviews, Original Articles, How I Do It, Case Reports (only of exceptional interest and novelty are accepted), Letters, Techniques and Images, abstracts and news items that may be of interest to endoscopists.