M Annelise Blanchard, Margaret L Kerr, Heather Kirkorian, Rachel Barr, Yorgo Hoebeke, Alexandre Heeren
{"title":"父母的情感动态:情感距离的惯性是严重的父母倦怠的特征。","authors":"M Annelise Blanchard, Margaret L Kerr, Heather Kirkorian, Rachel Barr, Yorgo Hoebeke, Alexandre Heeren","doi":"10.1037/fam0001327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our emotional trajectories make up our affective experience-but these can be disrupted during mental illness. This study focuses on affect anchored to the parenting context (i.e., daily emotional exhaustion, emotional distance from children, and feeling fed up) to assess whether the way parenting affect fluctuates relates to dysfunction: parental burnout severity. We focus on three specific patterns (i.e., affective dynamic indices): <i>inertia</i> (i.e., persistence across days), <i>variation</i> (i.e., magnitude of change), and <i>covariation</i> (i.e., whether affect variables fluctuate together). We reanalyzed multiple data sets (from Belgium and the United States) yielding 180 parents who had rated their parenting affect daily for either 3 or 8 weeks. We computed a regression model with all affective indices as predictors (controlling for mean levels), with parental burnout severity as the outcome variable. Results indicate that inertia of emotional distance predicts parental burnout severity across most sensitivity models (i.e., even with varied operationalizations of affective indices). No other temporal pattern (i.e., variation or covariation) robustly predicted parental burnout severity, although the mean levels of emotional distance and emotional exhaustion did. Results from sensitivity analyses emphasize that operationalization choices for affective indices can yield varying values and impact results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The affective dynamics of parenting: Inertia of emotional distance characterizes severe parental burnout.\",\"authors\":\"M Annelise Blanchard, Margaret L Kerr, Heather Kirkorian, Rachel Barr, Yorgo Hoebeke, Alexandre Heeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fam0001327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our emotional trajectories make up our affective experience-but these can be disrupted during mental illness. This study focuses on affect anchored to the parenting context (i.e., daily emotional exhaustion, emotional distance from children, and feeling fed up) to assess whether the way parenting affect fluctuates relates to dysfunction: parental burnout severity. We focus on three specific patterns (i.e., affective dynamic indices): <i>inertia</i> (i.e., persistence across days), <i>variation</i> (i.e., magnitude of change), and <i>covariation</i> (i.e., whether affect variables fluctuate together). We reanalyzed multiple data sets (from Belgium and the United States) yielding 180 parents who had rated their parenting affect daily for either 3 or 8 weeks. We computed a regression model with all affective indices as predictors (controlling for mean levels), with parental burnout severity as the outcome variable. Results indicate that inertia of emotional distance predicts parental burnout severity across most sensitivity models (i.e., even with varied operationalizations of affective indices). No other temporal pattern (i.e., variation or covariation) robustly predicted parental burnout severity, although the mean levels of emotional distance and emotional exhaustion did. Results from sensitivity analyses emphasize that operationalization choices for affective indices can yield varying values and impact results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001327\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
我们的情感轨迹构成了我们的情感体验——但这些轨迹在精神疾病期间可能会被打乱。本研究关注的是与养育背景相关的影响(即日常情绪耗竭、与孩子的情感距离、感到厌倦),以评估养育影响波动的方式是否与功能障碍有关:父母倦怠的严重程度。我们关注三种特定模式(即,情感动态指数):惯性(即,跨天的持久性),变化(即,变化的幅度)和协变(即,影响变量是否一起波动)。我们重新分析了多个数据集(来自比利时和美国),产生了180名父母,他们在3周或8周内每天评估他们的育儿影响。我们计算了一个回归模型,以所有情感指数作为预测因子(控制平均水平),以父母倦怠严重程度作为结果变量。结果表明,在大多数敏感性模型中,情感距离的惯性可以预测父母倦怠的严重程度(即,即使情感指数的操作方式不同)。虽然情绪距离和情绪耗竭的平均水平可以预测父母的倦怠严重程度,但其他时间模式(即变异或共变异)都不能强有力地预测父母的倦怠严重程度。敏感性分析的结果强调,情感指标的操作化选择可以产生不同的值和影响结果。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
The affective dynamics of parenting: Inertia of emotional distance characterizes severe parental burnout.
Our emotional trajectories make up our affective experience-but these can be disrupted during mental illness. This study focuses on affect anchored to the parenting context (i.e., daily emotional exhaustion, emotional distance from children, and feeling fed up) to assess whether the way parenting affect fluctuates relates to dysfunction: parental burnout severity. We focus on three specific patterns (i.e., affective dynamic indices): inertia (i.e., persistence across days), variation (i.e., magnitude of change), and covariation (i.e., whether affect variables fluctuate together). We reanalyzed multiple data sets (from Belgium and the United States) yielding 180 parents who had rated their parenting affect daily for either 3 or 8 weeks. We computed a regression model with all affective indices as predictors (controlling for mean levels), with parental burnout severity as the outcome variable. Results indicate that inertia of emotional distance predicts parental burnout severity across most sensitivity models (i.e., even with varied operationalizations of affective indices). No other temporal pattern (i.e., variation or covariation) robustly predicted parental burnout severity, although the mean levels of emotional distance and emotional exhaustion did. Results from sensitivity analyses emphasize that operationalization choices for affective indices can yield varying values and impact results. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.