IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Jennifer A Somers, Gabrielle R Rinne, Margot E Barclay, Christine Dunkel Schetter, Steve S Lee
{"title":"Affect synchrony and emotion coregulation are separable processes: Evaluation of relational stress and mother-infant synchrony.","authors":"Jennifer A Somers, Gabrielle R Rinne, Margot E Barclay, Christine Dunkel Schetter, Steve S Lee","doi":"10.1037/fam0001310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Establishing and repairing ruptures in mother-infant positive affect synchrony are thought to support infants' self-regulation and social competence. Yet, despite rich theorizing, little is known about associations between mother-infant positive affect synchrony and emotion coregulation. This study used the Still Face Paradigm (SFP), which consists of separate initial play, Still Face (SF) stressor, and reunion phases, to assess levels and changes of within-dyad synchrony before and after an experimentally induced relational stressor in a sample of 77 mother-infant (<i>M</i> = 5.6 months; 53% female) dyads. We hypothesized that, on average, dyads would exhibit positive affect synchrony before and after the SF and that within-dyad affect synchrony would increase following the SF. Guided by biobehavioral synchrony and mutual regulation models, we also hypothesized that post-SF increases in synchrony and greater post-SF synchrony would be associated with greater infant negative affect reactivity and recovery. Infant negative affect and infant and maternal positive affect were coded in 3-s epochs for each phase of the Still Face Paradigm. Analyses used residual dynamic structural equation modeling, which disentangled mother- and infant-led synchrony, and multilevel regression. Hypotheses regarding typical within-dyad processes were generally supported: Mother-led positive affect synchrony increased from baseline to the poststressor reunion play, and there was evidence of both infant- and mother-led positive affect synchrony during the reunion. Yet, neither infant negative reactivity nor recovery was associated with changes in positive affect synchrony or post-SF levels of synchrony. Results highlight that synchrony is sensitive to relational stress but challenge traditional assumptions that \"more\" synchrony promotes emotion coregulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001310","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建立和修复母婴积极情绪同步的破裂被认为有助于婴儿的自我调节和社交能力。然而,尽管有丰富的理论,人们对母婴积极情绪同步与情绪核心调节之间的关系却知之甚少。本研究采用了静止脸范式(SFP),该范式由独立的初始游戏、静止脸(SF)压力源和重聚阶段组成,以 77 个母婴(男 = 5.6 个月;53% 为女性)为样本,在实验诱导的关系压力源前后,评估母婴同步性的水平和变化。我们的假设是,平均而言,双亲在自毁前后会表现出积极的情感同步性,而在自毁后,双亲内部的情感同步性会增加。在生物行为同步性和相互调节模型的指导下,我们还假设,SF 后同步性的增加和 SF 后同步性的提高将与婴儿消极情绪的反应性和恢复有关。在静止面部范式的每个阶段,婴儿的负面情绪以及婴儿和母亲的积极情绪均以 3 秒钟的时间为单位进行编码。分析使用了残差动态结构方程模型(该模型可将母亲和婴儿主导的同步性分开)和多层次回归。有关典型日内过程的假设得到了普遍支持:母亲主导的积极情绪同步性从基线上升到压力后的团聚游戏,有证据表明在团聚过程中婴儿和母亲都主导了积极情绪同步性。然而,婴儿的消极反应和恢复都与积极情绪同步性的变化或SF后的同步性水平无关。研究结果强调了同步性对关系压力的敏感性,但对 "更多 "同步性能促进情绪核心调节的传统假设提出了质疑。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Affect synchrony and emotion coregulation are separable processes: Evaluation of relational stress and mother-infant synchrony.

Establishing and repairing ruptures in mother-infant positive affect synchrony are thought to support infants' self-regulation and social competence. Yet, despite rich theorizing, little is known about associations between mother-infant positive affect synchrony and emotion coregulation. This study used the Still Face Paradigm (SFP), which consists of separate initial play, Still Face (SF) stressor, and reunion phases, to assess levels and changes of within-dyad synchrony before and after an experimentally induced relational stressor in a sample of 77 mother-infant (M = 5.6 months; 53% female) dyads. We hypothesized that, on average, dyads would exhibit positive affect synchrony before and after the SF and that within-dyad affect synchrony would increase following the SF. Guided by biobehavioral synchrony and mutual regulation models, we also hypothesized that post-SF increases in synchrony and greater post-SF synchrony would be associated with greater infant negative affect reactivity and recovery. Infant negative affect and infant and maternal positive affect were coded in 3-s epochs for each phase of the Still Face Paradigm. Analyses used residual dynamic structural equation modeling, which disentangled mother- and infant-led synchrony, and multilevel regression. Hypotheses regarding typical within-dyad processes were generally supported: Mother-led positive affect synchrony increased from baseline to the poststressor reunion play, and there was evidence of both infant- and mother-led positive affect synchrony during the reunion. Yet, neither infant negative reactivity nor recovery was associated with changes in positive affect synchrony or post-SF levels of synchrony. Results highlight that synchrony is sensitive to relational stress but challenge traditional assumptions that "more" synchrony promotes emotion coregulation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信