童年逆境累积与维度对母亲睡眠质量的影响。

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Jill T Krause, Samantha A Murray-Perdue, Camie A Tomlinson, Samantha M Brown
{"title":"童年逆境累积与维度对母亲睡眠质量的影响。","authors":"Jill T Krause, Samantha A Murray-Perdue, Camie A Tomlinson, Samantha M Brown","doi":"10.1037/fam0001322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined the extent to which cumulative and specific dimensions-threat and deprivation-of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep quality in postpartum mothers. Eighty-seven mothers of infants completed assessments on sociodemographic characteristics, ACEs, and sleep quality. The sample was 39.1% White, 21.8% Latina, 16.1% Black/African American, 10.3% more than one race, 4.6% Asian, 4.6% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2.4% unspecified race/ethnicity, and 1.1% Pacific Islander. An exploratory factor analysis was computed in which ACEs were categorized as dimensions of threat (i.e., experiencing harm or threat of harm) or deprivation (i.e., an absence of cognitive and social inputs). Separate generalized linear models were conducted to examine (a) cumulative ACEs and (b) threat and deprivation dimensions of ACEs in relation to maternal sleep quality scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); higher PSQI scores indicate worse sleep quality. Likelihood ratio tests were conducted to compare if there were significant differences in model fit between the threat and deprivation model versus the cumulative ACEs model. Cumulative ACEs were positively associated with global PSQI scores. Threat, but not deprivation, was positively associated with global PSQI scores. The difference in variance explained between the two models was not statistically significant. The present study highlights the utility of dimensional models of adversity in conjunction with the cumulative ACEs model to identify more nuanced relationships between early adversity and maternal sleep outcomes. This approach may advance research on more targeted interventions during the postpartum period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of cumulative and dimensional childhood adversity on maternal sleep quality.\",\"authors\":\"Jill T Krause, Samantha A Murray-Perdue, Camie A Tomlinson, Samantha M Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fam0001322\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This cross-sectional study examined the extent to which cumulative and specific dimensions-threat and deprivation-of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep quality in postpartum mothers. Eighty-seven mothers of infants completed assessments on sociodemographic characteristics, ACEs, and sleep quality. The sample was 39.1% White, 21.8% Latina, 16.1% Black/African American, 10.3% more than one race, 4.6% Asian, 4.6% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2.4% unspecified race/ethnicity, and 1.1% Pacific Islander. An exploratory factor analysis was computed in which ACEs were categorized as dimensions of threat (i.e., experiencing harm or threat of harm) or deprivation (i.e., an absence of cognitive and social inputs). Separate generalized linear models were conducted to examine (a) cumulative ACEs and (b) threat and deprivation dimensions of ACEs in relation to maternal sleep quality scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); higher PSQI scores indicate worse sleep quality. Likelihood ratio tests were conducted to compare if there were significant differences in model fit between the threat and deprivation model versus the cumulative ACEs model. Cumulative ACEs were positively associated with global PSQI scores. Threat, but not deprivation, was positively associated with global PSQI scores. The difference in variance explained between the two models was not statistically significant. The present study highlights the utility of dimensional models of adversity in conjunction with the cumulative ACEs model to identify more nuanced relationships between early adversity and maternal sleep outcomes. This approach may advance research on more targeted interventions during the postpartum period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项横断面研究考察了累积和特定维度——威胁和剥夺——不良童年经历(ace)与产后母亲睡眠质量的关系程度。87名婴儿母亲完成了社会人口学特征、ace和睡眠质量的评估。样本中白人占39.1%,拉丁裔占21.8%,黑人/非裔美国人占16.1%,一个以上种族占10.3%,亚洲人占4.6%,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民占4.6%,未指明种族/民族占2.4%,太平洋岛民占1.1%。我们进行了探索性因素分析,将ace分为威胁(即经历伤害或伤害威胁)或剥夺(即缺乏认知和社会投入)两个维度。采用单独的广义线性模型来检验(a)累积不良经历维度和(b)不良经历威胁和剥夺维度与母亲匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)睡眠质量分数的关系;PSQI得分越高表明睡眠质量越差。采用似然比检验比较威胁剥夺模型与累积ace模型在模型拟合上是否存在显著差异。累积ace与PSQI总分呈正相关。威胁,而非剥夺,与整体PSQI分数呈正相关。两种模型的方差解释差异无统计学意义。本研究强调了逆境维度模型与累积ace模型结合的效用,以确定早期逆境与母亲睡眠结果之间更微妙的关系。这种方法可能会在产后期间推进更有针对性的干预研究。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The influence of cumulative and dimensional childhood adversity on maternal sleep quality.

This cross-sectional study examined the extent to which cumulative and specific dimensions-threat and deprivation-of adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with sleep quality in postpartum mothers. Eighty-seven mothers of infants completed assessments on sociodemographic characteristics, ACEs, and sleep quality. The sample was 39.1% White, 21.8% Latina, 16.1% Black/African American, 10.3% more than one race, 4.6% Asian, 4.6% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2.4% unspecified race/ethnicity, and 1.1% Pacific Islander. An exploratory factor analysis was computed in which ACEs were categorized as dimensions of threat (i.e., experiencing harm or threat of harm) or deprivation (i.e., an absence of cognitive and social inputs). Separate generalized linear models were conducted to examine (a) cumulative ACEs and (b) threat and deprivation dimensions of ACEs in relation to maternal sleep quality scores on the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI); higher PSQI scores indicate worse sleep quality. Likelihood ratio tests were conducted to compare if there were significant differences in model fit between the threat and deprivation model versus the cumulative ACEs model. Cumulative ACEs were positively associated with global PSQI scores. Threat, but not deprivation, was positively associated with global PSQI scores. The difference in variance explained between the two models was not statistically significant. The present study highlights the utility of dimensional models of adversity in conjunction with the cumulative ACEs model to identify more nuanced relationships between early adversity and maternal sleep outcomes. This approach may advance research on more targeted interventions during the postpartum period. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
200
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Psychology offers cutting-edge, groundbreaking, state-of-the-art, and innovative empirical research with real-world applicability in the field of family psychology. This premiere family research journal is devoted to the study of the family system, broadly defined, from multiple perspectives and to the application of psychological methods to advance knowledge related to family research, patterns and processes, and assessment and intervention, as well as to policies relevant to advancing the quality of life for families.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信