用于自动化临床试验匹配的大型语言模型。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Current Opinion in Urology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1097/MOU.0000000000001281
Ethan Layne, Claire Olivas, Jacob Hershenhouse, Conner Ganjavi, Francesco Cei, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani
{"title":"用于自动化临床试验匹配的大型语言模型。","authors":"Ethan Layne, Claire Olivas, Jacob Hershenhouse, Conner Ganjavi, Francesco Cei, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani","doi":"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The uses of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies in medicine are expanding, with the use of large language models (LLMs) for matching patients to clinical trials of particular interest. This review provides an overview of the current ability of leveraging LLMs for clinical trial matching.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This review article examines recent studies assessing the performance of LLMs in oncologic clinical trial matching. The research in this area has shown promising results when testing these system using artificially created datasets. In general, they looked at how LLMs can be used to match patient health records with clinical trial eligibility criteria. There is still a need for human oversight of the systems in their current state.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Automated clinical trial matching can improve patient access and autonomy, reduce provider workload, and increase trial enrollment. However, it may potentially create a feeling of \"false hope\" for patients, can be difficult to navigate, and still requires human oversight. Providers may face a learning curve, while institutions must address data privacy concerns and ensure seamless EMR/EHR integration. Given this, additional studies are needed to ensure safety and efficacy of LLM-based clinical trial matching in oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11093,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Urology","volume":" ","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large language models for automating clinical trial matching.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan Layne, Claire Olivas, Jacob Hershenhouse, Conner Ganjavi, Francesco Cei, Inderbir Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MOU.0000000000001281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The uses of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies in medicine are expanding, with the use of large language models (LLMs) for matching patients to clinical trials of particular interest. This review provides an overview of the current ability of leveraging LLMs for clinical trial matching.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>This review article examines recent studies assessing the performance of LLMs in oncologic clinical trial matching. The research in this area has shown promising results when testing these system using artificially created datasets. In general, they looked at how LLMs can be used to match patient health records with clinical trial eligibility criteria. There is still a need for human oversight of the systems in their current state.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Automated clinical trial matching can improve patient access and autonomy, reduce provider workload, and increase trial enrollment. However, it may potentially create a feeling of \\\"false hope\\\" for patients, can be difficult to navigate, and still requires human oversight. Providers may face a learning curve, while institutions must address data privacy concerns and ensure seamless EMR/EHR integration. Given this, additional studies are needed to ensure safety and efficacy of LLM-based clinical trial matching in oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"250-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001281\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000001281","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:生成式人工智能(GAI)技术在医学中的应用正在扩大,使用大型语言模型(llm)将患者与特别感兴趣的临床试验相匹配。这篇综述概述了目前利用法学硕士进行临床试验匹配的能力。最近的发现:这篇综述文章检查了最近的研究评估llm在肿瘤学临床试验匹配中的表现。在使用人工创建的数据集测试这些系统时,该领域的研究已经显示出有希望的结果。总的来说,他们研究了法学硕士如何用于将患者健康记录与临床试验资格标准相匹配。在目前的状态下,仍然需要人类对系统进行监督。摘要:自动化临床试验匹配可以改善患者的访问和自主权,减少提供者的工作量,并增加试验登记。然而,它可能会给病人带来一种“虚假希望”的感觉,可能难以驾驭,并且仍然需要人类的监督。供应商可能会面临学习曲线,而机构必须解决数据隐私问题,并确保EMR/EHR无缝集成。鉴于此,需要进一步的研究来确保基于llm的肿瘤临床试验匹配的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large language models for automating clinical trial matching.

Purpose of review: The uses of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies in medicine are expanding, with the use of large language models (LLMs) for matching patients to clinical trials of particular interest. This review provides an overview of the current ability of leveraging LLMs for clinical trial matching.

Recent findings: This review article examines recent studies assessing the performance of LLMs in oncologic clinical trial matching. The research in this area has shown promising results when testing these system using artificially created datasets. In general, they looked at how LLMs can be used to match patient health records with clinical trial eligibility criteria. There is still a need for human oversight of the systems in their current state.

Summary: Automated clinical trial matching can improve patient access and autonomy, reduce provider workload, and increase trial enrollment. However, it may potentially create a feeling of "false hope" for patients, can be difficult to navigate, and still requires human oversight. Providers may face a learning curve, while institutions must address data privacy concerns and ensure seamless EMR/EHR integration. Given this, additional studies are needed to ensure safety and efficacy of LLM-based clinical trial matching in oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Urology
Current Opinion in Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Urology delivers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and most exciting developments in urology from across the world. Published bimonthly and featuring ten key topics – including focuses on prostate cancer, bladder cancer and minimally invasive urology – the journal’s renowned team of guest editors ensure a balanced, expert assessment of the recently published literature in each respective field with insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信