视频辅助肌肉下乳房重建:评估高风险患者的新技术。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Gland surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-28 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.21037/gs-2024-485
Leonardo Barellini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Pietro Susini, Ishith Seth, Mirco Pozzi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Gianluca Marcaccini
{"title":"视频辅助肌肉下乳房重建:评估高风险患者的新技术。","authors":"Leonardo Barellini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Pietro Susini, Ishith Seth, Mirco Pozzi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Gianluca Marcaccini","doi":"10.21037/gs-2024-485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent oncological diseases worldwide, with mastectomy often necessary for treatment. Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential for restoring physical integrity and improving patients' quality of life, especially in high-risk individuals with advanced age, obesity, diabetes, smoking habits, or a history of radiotherapy. Traditional submuscular reconstruction techniques are effective but often associated with higher rates of complications in this patient population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel video-assisted procedure (VAP) for submuscular breast reconstruction, focusing on its ability to reduce complications and enhance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis compared 17 high-risk patients who underwent VAP with 127 patients treated using traditional non-video-assisted procedures (NVAP) between September 2022 and June 2024. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index (BMI), and risk factors. Data on postoperative complications, including bleeding, wound dehiscence, and infections, were collected and analyzed. Statistical significance was determined using appropriate tests, with a P value <0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAP group demonstrated significant reductions in complications compared to the NVAP group. No cases of postoperative bleeding were reported in the VAP group, while 8.66% of NVAP patients experienced bleeding. Wound dehiscence rates were also lower in the VAP group (5.88%) compared to the NVAP group (10.24%). The minimally invasive nature of VAP allowed for precise dissection and reduced tissue trauma without prolonging surgical times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that VAP is a safer and more effective alternative for high-risk patients requiring submuscular breast reconstruction. By minimizing complications and enhancing both functional and aesthetic outcomes, VAP offers a promising innovation in reconstructive surgery. Larger, randomized trials are necessary to validate these results and establish VAP as a standard of care in diverse clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"172-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921365/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Video-assisted submuscular breast reconstruction: evaluating a novel technique in high-risk patients.\",\"authors\":\"Leonardo Barellini, Simone Miccoli, Benedetta Daicampi, Pietro Susini, Ishith Seth, Mirco Pozzi, Roberto Cuomo, Luca Grimaldi, Gianluca Marcaccini\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-2024-485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent oncological diseases worldwide, with mastectomy often necessary for treatment. Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential for restoring physical integrity and improving patients' quality of life, especially in high-risk individuals with advanced age, obesity, diabetes, smoking habits, or a history of radiotherapy. Traditional submuscular reconstruction techniques are effective but often associated with higher rates of complications in this patient population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel video-assisted procedure (VAP) for submuscular breast reconstruction, focusing on its ability to reduce complications and enhance outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis compared 17 high-risk patients who underwent VAP with 127 patients treated using traditional non-video-assisted procedures (NVAP) between September 2022 and June 2024. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index (BMI), and risk factors. Data on postoperative complications, including bleeding, wound dehiscence, and infections, were collected and analyzed. Statistical significance was determined using appropriate tests, with a P value <0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAP group demonstrated significant reductions in complications compared to the NVAP group. No cases of postoperative bleeding were reported in the VAP group, while 8.66% of NVAP patients experienced bleeding. Wound dehiscence rates were also lower in the VAP group (5.88%) compared to the NVAP group (10.24%). The minimally invasive nature of VAP allowed for precise dissection and reduced tissue trauma without prolonging surgical times.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings suggest that VAP is a safer and more effective alternative for high-risk patients requiring submuscular breast reconstruction. By minimizing complications and enhancing both functional and aesthetic outcomes, VAP offers a promising innovation in reconstructive surgery. Larger, randomized trials are necessary to validate these results and establish VAP as a standard of care in diverse clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"172-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921365/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2024-485\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-2024-485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:乳腺癌是全球发病率最高的肿瘤疾病之一,通常需要切除乳房进行治疗。乳房切除术后乳房重建对于恢复身体完整性和提高患者生活质量至关重要,尤其是对于高龄、肥胖、糖尿病、有吸烟习惯或放疗史的高危人群。传统的肌下重建技术虽然有效,但在这类患者中往往并发症发生率较高。本研究旨在评估新型视频辅助乳房下重建术(VAP)的有效性和安全性,重点关注其减少并发症和提高疗效的能力:一项回顾性分析比较了2022年9月至2024年6月期间接受VAP手术的17名高风险患者和使用传统非视频辅助手术(NVAP)治疗的127名患者。两组患者的年龄、体重指数(BMI)和风险因素相当。收集并分析了术后并发症数据,包括出血、伤口开裂和感染。统计意义通过适当的检验来确定,P 值为 结果:与 NVAP 组相比,VAP 组的并发症明显减少。VAP 组无术后出血病例,而 NVAP 组有 8.66% 的患者出现出血。VAP 组的伤口裂开率(5.88%)也低于 NVAP 组(10.24%)。VAP 的微创性质允许精确解剖,减少了组织创伤,同时也不会延长手术时间:研究结果表明,对于需要进行肌下乳房重建的高风险患者来说,VAP 是一种更安全、更有效的选择。通过减少并发症,提高功能和美学效果,VAP 为重建手术提供了一种前景广阔的创新方法。有必要进行更大规模的随机试验来验证这些结果,并将 VAP 确立为不同临床环境中的护理标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Video-assisted submuscular breast reconstruction: evaluating a novel technique in high-risk patients.

Background: Breast cancer is one of the most prevalent oncological diseases worldwide, with mastectomy often necessary for treatment. Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is essential for restoring physical integrity and improving patients' quality of life, especially in high-risk individuals with advanced age, obesity, diabetes, smoking habits, or a history of radiotherapy. Traditional submuscular reconstruction techniques are effective but often associated with higher rates of complications in this patient population. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel video-assisted procedure (VAP) for submuscular breast reconstruction, focusing on its ability to reduce complications and enhance outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective analysis compared 17 high-risk patients who underwent VAP with 127 patients treated using traditional non-video-assisted procedures (NVAP) between September 2022 and June 2024. Both groups were comparable in age, body mass index (BMI), and risk factors. Data on postoperative complications, including bleeding, wound dehiscence, and infections, were collected and analyzed. Statistical significance was determined using appropriate tests, with a P value <0.05 considered significant.

Results: The VAP group demonstrated significant reductions in complications compared to the NVAP group. No cases of postoperative bleeding were reported in the VAP group, while 8.66% of NVAP patients experienced bleeding. Wound dehiscence rates were also lower in the VAP group (5.88%) compared to the NVAP group (10.24%). The minimally invasive nature of VAP allowed for precise dissection and reduced tissue trauma without prolonging surgical times.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that VAP is a safer and more effective alternative for high-risk patients requiring submuscular breast reconstruction. By minimizing complications and enhancing both functional and aesthetic outcomes, VAP offers a promising innovation in reconstructive surgery. Larger, randomized trials are necessary to validate these results and establish VAP as a standard of care in diverse clinical settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信