Filippo Carletti, Filippo Crimì, Gianmarco Randazzo, Giuseppe Reitano, Giovanni Basso, Ermanno Maria Segreto, Salvatore Carrozza, Francesca Sattin, Matteo Todisco, Giovanni Betto, Giacomo Novara, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Fabio Zattoni
{"title":"mri衍生的精确评分用于预测前列腺癌患者在积极监测下病理证实的进展。","authors":"Filippo Carletti, Filippo Crimì, Gianmarco Randazzo, Giuseppe Reitano, Giovanni Basso, Ermanno Maria Segreto, Salvatore Carrozza, Francesca Sattin, Matteo Todisco, Giovanni Betto, Giacomo Novara, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Fabio Zattoni","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.59","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) remains a topic of debate. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system is used to evaluate the progression of MRI lesions in men undergoing AS.This study aims to evaluate the predictive capacity of the PRECISE score in monitoring PCa patients on AS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A cohort of 63 men enrolled in an AS program between 2017 and 2021 was analyzed. Sequential MRIs within the AS protocol were assessed by a specialized radiologist using the PRECISE score. Data on biopsy outcomes, pathological progression, and treatment progression were documented. The relationship between progression and the PRECISE score was examined. Univariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort exhibited ISUP progression and biopsy progression rates of 27.6% (16/63) and 48.3% (28/63), respectively. At the second MRI, a PRECISE score exceeding 3 was observed in 31 patients (53.4%), with 25 patients (43.1%) showing new lesions. Overall, 23 patients (39.7%) underwent active treatment during a median follow-up of 117 months. The PRECISE score emerged as the sole predictor, in univariate analysis, of ISUP progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.04), biopsy progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.03), and active treatment (HR: 1.1, IQR: 1.0-1.6, p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PRECISE scoring system facilitates the identification of patients at risk of ISUP and biopsy progression within an AS protocol utilizing mpMRI. These findings underscore the significance of mpMRI in AS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"77 3","pages":"398-402"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI-derived PRECISE score for predicting pathologically-confirmed progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.\",\"authors\":\"Filippo Carletti, Filippo Crimì, Gianmarco Randazzo, Giuseppe Reitano, Giovanni Basso, Ermanno Maria Segreto, Salvatore Carrozza, Francesca Sattin, Matteo Todisco, Giovanni Betto, Giacomo Novara, Fabrizio Dal Moro, Fabio Zattoni\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2024.59\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) remains a topic of debate. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system is used to evaluate the progression of MRI lesions in men undergoing AS.This study aims to evaluate the predictive capacity of the PRECISE score in monitoring PCa patients on AS.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A cohort of 63 men enrolled in an AS program between 2017 and 2021 was analyzed. Sequential MRIs within the AS protocol were assessed by a specialized radiologist using the PRECISE score. Data on biopsy outcomes, pathological progression, and treatment progression were documented. The relationship between progression and the PRECISE score was examined. Univariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters associated with disease progression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort exhibited ISUP progression and biopsy progression rates of 27.6% (16/63) and 48.3% (28/63), respectively. At the second MRI, a PRECISE score exceeding 3 was observed in 31 patients (53.4%), with 25 patients (43.1%) showing new lesions. Overall, 23 patients (39.7%) underwent active treatment during a median follow-up of 117 months. The PRECISE score emerged as the sole predictor, in univariate analysis, of ISUP progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.04), biopsy progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.03), and active treatment (HR: 1.1, IQR: 1.0-1.6, p = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PRECISE scoring system facilitates the identification of patients at risk of ISUP and biopsy progression within an AS protocol utilizing mpMRI. These findings underscore the significance of mpMRI in AS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"77 3\",\"pages\":\"398-402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11921959/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.59\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.59","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
磁共振成像(MRI)在前列腺癌(PCa)主动监测(AS)中的应用仍然是一个有争议的话题。前列腺癌放射学序列评估变化(PRECISE)评分系统用于评估男性AS的MRI病变进展。本研究旨在评估precision评分在监测前列腺癌AS患者中的预测能力。材料和方法:对2017年至2021年间参加AS项目的63名男性进行了分析。AS方案内的顺序mri由专业放射科医生使用PRECISE评分进行评估。记录了活检结果、病理进展和治疗进展的数据。研究进展与PRECISE评分之间的关系。进行单因素逻辑分析和Cox回归分析,以确定与疾病进展相关的基线临床和mpMRI参数。结果:该队列的ISUP进展率和活检进展率分别为27.6%(16/63)和48.3%(28/63)。第二次MRI时,31例(53.4%)患者的PRECISE评分超过3分,其中25例(43.1%)出现新病灶。总体而言,23名患者(39.7%)在中位随访117个月期间接受了积极治疗。在单变量分析中,PRECISE评分成为ISUP进展(OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.04)、活检进展(OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.03)和积极治疗(HR: 1.1, IQR: 1.0-1.6, p = 0.05)的唯一预测因子。结论:PRECISE评分系统有助于在AS方案中利用mpMRI识别有ISUP风险和活检进展的患者。这些发现强调了mpMRI在AS中的重要性。
MRI-derived PRECISE score for predicting pathologically-confirmed progression in prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.
Introduction: The utilization of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in active surveillance (AS) of prostate cancer (PCa) remains a topic of debate. The Prostate Cancer Radiological Estimation of Change in Sequential Evaluation (PRECISE) scoring system is used to evaluate the progression of MRI lesions in men undergoing AS.This study aims to evaluate the predictive capacity of the PRECISE score in monitoring PCa patients on AS.
Material and methods: A cohort of 63 men enrolled in an AS program between 2017 and 2021 was analyzed. Sequential MRIs within the AS protocol were assessed by a specialized radiologist using the PRECISE score. Data on biopsy outcomes, pathological progression, and treatment progression were documented. The relationship between progression and the PRECISE score was examined. Univariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the baseline clinical and mpMRI parameters associated with disease progression.
Results: The cohort exhibited ISUP progression and biopsy progression rates of 27.6% (16/63) and 48.3% (28/63), respectively. At the second MRI, a PRECISE score exceeding 3 was observed in 31 patients (53.4%), with 25 patients (43.1%) showing new lesions. Overall, 23 patients (39.7%) underwent active treatment during a median follow-up of 117 months. The PRECISE score emerged as the sole predictor, in univariate analysis, of ISUP progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.04), biopsy progression (OR: 3.2, IQR: 1.1-9.7, p = 0.03), and active treatment (HR: 1.1, IQR: 1.0-1.6, p = 0.05).
Conclusions: The PRECISE scoring system facilitates the identification of patients at risk of ISUP and biopsy progression within an AS protocol utilizing mpMRI. These findings underscore the significance of mpMRI in AS.