重症监护室乏力患者呼吸肌和四肢肌肉反复产生最大等长力量的能力:一项观察性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Margaux Machefert, Guillaume Prieur, Solène Aubry, Yann Combret, Clément Medrinal
{"title":"重症监护室乏力患者呼吸肌和四肢肌肉反复产生最大等长力量的能力:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Margaux Machefert, Guillaume Prieur, Solène Aubry, Yann Combret, Clément Medrinal","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03008-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-Aw) is a prevalent complication in critically ill patients, affecting both limb and respiratory muscles, individually or concurrently. The precise mechanisms by which muscle weakness influences the distinct functional roles of each muscle group remain to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study was to compare the time course evolution of inspiratory and quadriceps muscles strength during repeated maximal isometric contractions in patients with limb muscles and inspiratory muscles weakness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, observational study was conducted in critically ill patients after extubation, presenting with both inspiratory and limb muscle weakness (defined as maximal inspiratory pressure (Pi<sub>max</sub>) < 30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and an MRC score < 48). The patients' ability to sustain maximal voluntary effort was measured using electronic manometers and dynamometers, with repeated efforts performed 10 times. Following each measurement, a 10-second rest period was observed, and strength measurements were repeated to evaluate recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients (90% male, mean age 61 ± 10 years, SAPS II score 28 ± 17) were included. The mean first maximal inspiratory pressure was 32.6 ± 17 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and the mean first quadriceps maximal force was 135 ± 90 Newtons (N). Investigation revealed a decline in quadriceps muscle force of -15.45 ± 28.61 N (95% CI: -28.84 to -2.05) while inspiratory muscles demonstrated stability (mean difference: 1.75 ± 7.57 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95% CI: -1.80 to 5.30)). A statistically significant interaction between time and muscle group was identified (p = 0.0017), suggesting a different time course evolution of maximal voluntary strength between muscle groups. After a one-minute recovery, significant improvement in quadriceps strength was observed (p = 0.009), while no statistically significant change was detected in inspiratory muscle strength (p = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate potential disparities in the maximum force maintenance capacity between the quadriceps muscles and inspiratory muscles in patients with ICU-acquired weakness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05396066.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Respiratory and limb muscles' ability to repeatedly generate maximal isometric strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Margaux Machefert, Guillaume Prieur, Solène Aubry, Yann Combret, Clément Medrinal\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03008-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-Aw) is a prevalent complication in critically ill patients, affecting both limb and respiratory muscles, individually or concurrently. The precise mechanisms by which muscle weakness influences the distinct functional roles of each muscle group remain to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study was to compare the time course evolution of inspiratory and quadriceps muscles strength during repeated maximal isometric contractions in patients with limb muscles and inspiratory muscles weakness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, observational study was conducted in critically ill patients after extubation, presenting with both inspiratory and limb muscle weakness (defined as maximal inspiratory pressure (Pi<sub>max</sub>) < 30 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and an MRC score < 48). The patients' ability to sustain maximal voluntary effort was measured using electronic manometers and dynamometers, with repeated efforts performed 10 times. Following each measurement, a 10-second rest period was observed, and strength measurements were repeated to evaluate recovery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients (90% male, mean age 61 ± 10 years, SAPS II score 28 ± 17) were included. The mean first maximal inspiratory pressure was 32.6 ± 17 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and the mean first quadriceps maximal force was 135 ± 90 Newtons (N). Investigation revealed a decline in quadriceps muscle force of -15.45 ± 28.61 N (95% CI: -28.84 to -2.05) while inspiratory muscles demonstrated stability (mean difference: 1.75 ± 7.57 cmH<sub>2</sub>O (95% CI: -1.80 to 5.30)). A statistically significant interaction between time and muscle group was identified (p = 0.0017), suggesting a different time course evolution of maximal voluntary strength between muscle groups. After a one-minute recovery, significant improvement in quadriceps strength was observed (p = 0.009), while no statistically significant change was detected in inspiratory muscle strength (p = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results of this study indicate potential disparities in the maximum force maintenance capacity between the quadriceps muscles and inspiratory muscles in patients with ICU-acquired weakness.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05396066.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11924868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03008-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03008-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Respiratory and limb muscles' ability to repeatedly generate maximal isometric strength in patients with intensive care unit-acquired weakness: an observational study.

Background: Intensive care unit-acquired weakness (ICU-Aw) is a prevalent complication in critically ill patients, affecting both limb and respiratory muscles, individually or concurrently. The precise mechanisms by which muscle weakness influences the distinct functional roles of each muscle group remain to be fully elucidated. The objective of this study was to compare the time course evolution of inspiratory and quadriceps muscles strength during repeated maximal isometric contractions in patients with limb muscles and inspiratory muscles weakness.

Methods: A single-center, observational study was conducted in critically ill patients after extubation, presenting with both inspiratory and limb muscle weakness (defined as maximal inspiratory pressure (Pimax) < 30 cmH2O and an MRC score < 48). The patients' ability to sustain maximal voluntary effort was measured using electronic manometers and dynamometers, with repeated efforts performed 10 times. Following each measurement, a 10-second rest period was observed, and strength measurements were repeated to evaluate recovery.

Results: A total of 20 patients (90% male, mean age 61 ± 10 years, SAPS II score 28 ± 17) were included. The mean first maximal inspiratory pressure was 32.6 ± 17 cmH2O, and the mean first quadriceps maximal force was 135 ± 90 Newtons (N). Investigation revealed a decline in quadriceps muscle force of -15.45 ± 28.61 N (95% CI: -28.84 to -2.05) while inspiratory muscles demonstrated stability (mean difference: 1.75 ± 7.57 cmH2O (95% CI: -1.80 to 5.30)). A statistically significant interaction between time and muscle group was identified (p = 0.0017), suggesting a different time course evolution of maximal voluntary strength between muscle groups. After a one-minute recovery, significant improvement in quadriceps strength was observed (p = 0.009), while no statistically significant change was detected in inspiratory muscle strength (p = 0.16).

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate potential disparities in the maximum force maintenance capacity between the quadriceps muscles and inspiratory muscles in patients with ICU-acquired weakness.

Trial registration: Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05396066.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信