实施中国强制性抗菌药物管理计划:持续改进的障碍。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xiaomin Wang, Leesa Lin, Xin Xu, Stephan Harbarth, Laith Yakob, Ran Zhang, Xudong Zhou
{"title":"实施中国强制性抗菌药物管理计划:持续改进的障碍。","authors":"Xiaomin Wang, Leesa Lin, Xin Xu, Stephan Harbarth, Laith Yakob, Ran Zhang, Xudong Zhou","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the implementation strategy, unintended consequences, and underlying barriers to mandatory antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in China. Face-to-face, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted in 16 public hospitals in eastern, central, and western China. Hospitals were purposely selected with full consideration to represent both economically developing and developed areas and both secondary and tertiary care hospitals. A total of 111 respondents were interviewed, including 38 doctors, 28 clinical pharmacists, 15 microbiologists, 14 infection prevention and control specialists, 10 experts from medical service departments, and 6 quality improvement experts. A thematic framework analysis was conducted. A common implementation strategy was found among the surveyed hospitals in response to the AMS programs mandated by healthcare authorities. The hospital leadership empowered an AMS team to set AMS-related indicators for each clinical department and each doctor, and adopted core elements of AMS to optimize antimicrobial prescribing. However, the mandatory AMS approach also caused unintended consequences including regulatory circumvention, shift of risk to doctors and patients, and demotivation of healthcare workers. Two key barriers to AMS implementation were identified: 1) poor communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, characterized by a high-power-low-power dynamic within hospital disciplines; and 2) the profit-driven compensation system, which discourages collaboration and resource distribution for AMS implementation. Mandatory AMS programs should intensify AMS training, promote communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, adjust the compensation system to facilitate better AMS implementation, and offer supportive measures that enable the adoption of strict regulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing the Chinese mandatory antimicrobial stewardship programme: barriers to continuous improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaomin Wang, Leesa Lin, Xin Xu, Stephan Harbarth, Laith Yakob, Ran Zhang, Xudong Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/heapol/czaf019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to investigate the implementation strategy, unintended consequences, and underlying barriers to mandatory antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in China. Face-to-face, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted in 16 public hospitals in eastern, central, and western China. Hospitals were purposely selected with full consideration to represent both economically developing and developed areas and both secondary and tertiary care hospitals. A total of 111 respondents were interviewed, including 38 doctors, 28 clinical pharmacists, 15 microbiologists, 14 infection prevention and control specialists, 10 experts from medical service departments, and 6 quality improvement experts. A thematic framework analysis was conducted. A common implementation strategy was found among the surveyed hospitals in response to the AMS programs mandated by healthcare authorities. The hospital leadership empowered an AMS team to set AMS-related indicators for each clinical department and each doctor, and adopted core elements of AMS to optimize antimicrobial prescribing. However, the mandatory AMS approach also caused unintended consequences including regulatory circumvention, shift of risk to doctors and patients, and demotivation of healthcare workers. Two key barriers to AMS implementation were identified: 1) poor communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, characterized by a high-power-low-power dynamic within hospital disciplines; and 2) the profit-driven compensation system, which discourages collaboration and resource distribution for AMS implementation. Mandatory AMS programs should intensify AMS training, promote communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, adjust the compensation system to facilitate better AMS implementation, and offer supportive measures that enable the adoption of strict regulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health policy and planning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查中国强制性抗菌药物管理(AMS)项目的实施策略、意外后果和潜在障碍。面对面、深入的定性访谈在中国东部、中部和西部的16所公立医院进行。医院的选择充分考虑了经济发达地区和经济发达地区的代表性,以及二级和三级医院的代表性。共访谈111人,其中医生38人,临床药师28人,微生物学家15人,感染防控专家14人,医疗服务部门专家10人,质量改进专家6人。进行了主题框架分析。在接受调查的医院中发现了一种共同的实施策略,以响应医疗保健当局授权的辅助医疗系统项目。医院领导授权AMS团队为每个临床科室和每位医生设定AMS相关指标,并采用AMS核心要素优化抗菌药物处方。然而,强制性辅助医疗服务的做法也造成了意想不到的后果,包括规避监管,将风险转移给医生和患者,以及医护人员的积极性下降。确定了实施医疗辅助系统的两个主要障碍:1)医疗辅助系统团队与医生之间缺乏沟通与合作,其特点是医院学科内部的高权力-低权力动态;2)利润驱动的薪酬制度,阻碍了AMS实施过程中的协作和资源分配。强制性医疗辅助服务项目应加强医疗辅助服务培训,促进医疗辅助服务团队与医生之间的沟通与合作,调整薪酬制度以促进医疗辅助服务的更好实施,并提供支持措施,使严格的法规得以实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing the Chinese mandatory antimicrobial stewardship programme: barriers to continuous improvement.

This study aims to investigate the implementation strategy, unintended consequences, and underlying barriers to mandatory antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs in China. Face-to-face, in-depth qualitative interviews were conducted in 16 public hospitals in eastern, central, and western China. Hospitals were purposely selected with full consideration to represent both economically developing and developed areas and both secondary and tertiary care hospitals. A total of 111 respondents were interviewed, including 38 doctors, 28 clinical pharmacists, 15 microbiologists, 14 infection prevention and control specialists, 10 experts from medical service departments, and 6 quality improvement experts. A thematic framework analysis was conducted. A common implementation strategy was found among the surveyed hospitals in response to the AMS programs mandated by healthcare authorities. The hospital leadership empowered an AMS team to set AMS-related indicators for each clinical department and each doctor, and adopted core elements of AMS to optimize antimicrobial prescribing. However, the mandatory AMS approach also caused unintended consequences including regulatory circumvention, shift of risk to doctors and patients, and demotivation of healthcare workers. Two key barriers to AMS implementation were identified: 1) poor communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, characterized by a high-power-low-power dynamic within hospital disciplines; and 2) the profit-driven compensation system, which discourages collaboration and resource distribution for AMS implementation. Mandatory AMS programs should intensify AMS training, promote communication and cooperation between the AMS team and doctors, adjust the compensation system to facilitate better AMS implementation, and offer supportive measures that enable the adoption of strict regulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信