淀粉样变性综合专科护理:使用实施研究综合框架进行的范围界定综述。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mary O'Sullivan, Wahab Osman, Archanaa Krisnagopal, Monica Parry, Margot Davis, Charlene H Chu
{"title":"淀粉样变性综合专科护理:使用实施研究综合框架进行的范围界定综述。","authors":"Mary O'Sullivan, Wahab Osman, Archanaa Krisnagopal, Monica Parry, Margot Davis, Charlene H Chu","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-12520-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyloidosis is a complex and rare disease requiring specialized, multidisciplinary care to effectively manage its diverse manifestations. Existing evidence underscores the benefits of such care, linked to improved patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction. With the rising incidence of amyloidosis diagnoses and rapid advancements in treatment, the need for coordinated, expert-led care is increasing. However, implementing these centers is challenging due to resource allocation and inter-specialty collaboration. While resource allocation is a known hurdle, there has not been a comprehensive review of all the barriers and facilitators to establishing these clinics. This scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of coordinated, multidisciplinary specialty care clinics in amyloidosis management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published in English from 2013 to 2023, supplemented by a grey literature search. The inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing multidisciplinary clinical environments for amyloidosis care, particularly light-chain (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR). Exclusion criteria included books, opinion pieces, dissertations, and conference abstracts. Data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in 1547 findings. After screening with Covidence, 7 papers were included in the final review. Independent reviewers screened and extracted the papers. Key facilitators identified include access to experts, adequate staffing, secure funding, partnerships with patient advocacy groups, and robust processes for multidisciplinary communication. Barriers primarily relate to the complexity of care, a lack of standardized protocols, difficulties in communication and coordination between providers, and challenges in training and maintaining knowledgeable care providers. The review also revealed significant gaps in existing research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review enhances understanding of the barriers and facilitators in establishing amyloidosis specialty clinics. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators are crucial for shaping the future of amyloidosis care. These insights support a model for implementing integrated care for this growing patient population and highlight the need for further research to support policy development and effective implementation of these specialized clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927205/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated specialty care for amyloidosis: a scoping review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.\",\"authors\":\"Mary O'Sullivan, Wahab Osman, Archanaa Krisnagopal, Monica Parry, Margot Davis, Charlene H Chu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-12520-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyloidosis is a complex and rare disease requiring specialized, multidisciplinary care to effectively manage its diverse manifestations. Existing evidence underscores the benefits of such care, linked to improved patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction. With the rising incidence of amyloidosis diagnoses and rapid advancements in treatment, the need for coordinated, expert-led care is increasing. However, implementing these centers is challenging due to resource allocation and inter-specialty collaboration. While resource allocation is a known hurdle, there has not been a comprehensive review of all the barriers and facilitators to establishing these clinics. This scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of coordinated, multidisciplinary specialty care clinics in amyloidosis management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published in English from 2013 to 2023, supplemented by a grey literature search. The inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing multidisciplinary clinical environments for amyloidosis care, particularly light-chain (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR). Exclusion criteria included books, opinion pieces, dissertations, and conference abstracts. Data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in 1547 findings. After screening with Covidence, 7 papers were included in the final review. Independent reviewers screened and extracted the papers. Key facilitators identified include access to experts, adequate staffing, secure funding, partnerships with patient advocacy groups, and robust processes for multidisciplinary communication. Barriers primarily relate to the complexity of care, a lack of standardized protocols, difficulties in communication and coordination between providers, and challenges in training and maintaining knowledgeable care providers. The review also revealed significant gaps in existing research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review enhances understanding of the barriers and facilitators in establishing amyloidosis specialty clinics. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators are crucial for shaping the future of amyloidosis care. These insights support a model for implementing integrated care for this growing patient population and highlight the need for further research to support policy development and effective implementation of these specialized clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"415\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11927205/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12520-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12520-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:淀粉样变性是一种复杂而罕见的疾病,需要专业的多学科治疗来有效控制其各种表现。现有证据强调了这种护理的益处,它能改善患者的预后并提高临床医生的满意度。随着淀粉样变性诊断率的上升和治疗技术的快速发展,对专家主导的协调护理的需求也在不断增加。然而,由于资源分配和专科间合作的原因,这些中心的实施具有挑战性。虽然资源分配是一个已知的障碍,但尚未对建立这些诊所的所有障碍和促进因素进行过全面审查。本范围界定综述旨在确定在淀粉样变性管理中实施协调、多学科专科护理诊所的相关障碍和促进因素:在 Medline、Embase 和 CINAHL 中对 2013 年至 2023 年发表的英文研究进行了电子检索,并辅以灰色文献检索。纳入标准侧重于讨论淀粉样变性,尤其是轻链(AL)和经淀粉样蛋白淀粉样变性(TTR)的多学科临床环境的研究。排除标准包括书籍、观点文章、论文和会议摘要。在实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的指导下,采用叙事综合法对数据进行分析和综合,并根据 PRISMA-ScR 指南进行报告:结果:搜索结果共 1547 条。经过 Covidence 筛选,7 篇论文被纳入最终审查。独立审稿人对论文进行了筛选和摘录。已确定的主要促进因素包括:获得专家的支持、充足的人员配备、可靠的资金、与患者权益团体的合作以及健全的多学科沟通流程。障碍主要涉及护理的复杂性、缺乏标准化协议、医疗服务提供者之间的沟通和协调困难,以及在培训和维持知识丰富的医疗服务提供者方面的挑战。综述还揭示了现有研究中存在的重大差距:本综述加深了人们对建立淀粉样变性专科诊所的障碍和促进因素的了解。解决这些障碍和利用促进因素对于塑造淀粉样变性护理的未来至关重要。这些见解支持为这一日益增长的患者群体实施综合治疗的模式,并强调了进一步研究的必要性,以支持这些专科诊所的政策制定和有效实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated specialty care for amyloidosis: a scoping review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Background: Amyloidosis is a complex and rare disease requiring specialized, multidisciplinary care to effectively manage its diverse manifestations. Existing evidence underscores the benefits of such care, linked to improved patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction. With the rising incidence of amyloidosis diagnoses and rapid advancements in treatment, the need for coordinated, expert-led care is increasing. However, implementing these centers is challenging due to resource allocation and inter-specialty collaboration. While resource allocation is a known hurdle, there has not been a comprehensive review of all the barriers and facilitators to establishing these clinics. This scoping review aims to identify the barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of coordinated, multidisciplinary specialty care clinics in amyloidosis management.

Methods: An electronic search was conducted in Medline, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published in English from 2013 to 2023, supplemented by a grey literature search. The inclusion criteria focused on studies discussing multidisciplinary clinical environments for amyloidosis care, particularly light-chain (AL) and transthyretin amyloidosis (TTR). Exclusion criteria included books, opinion pieces, dissertations, and conference abstracts. Data were analyzed and synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), and reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results: The search resulted in 1547 findings. After screening with Covidence, 7 papers were included in the final review. Independent reviewers screened and extracted the papers. Key facilitators identified include access to experts, adequate staffing, secure funding, partnerships with patient advocacy groups, and robust processes for multidisciplinary communication. Barriers primarily relate to the complexity of care, a lack of standardized protocols, difficulties in communication and coordination between providers, and challenges in training and maintaining knowledgeable care providers. The review also revealed significant gaps in existing research.

Conclusions: This review enhances understanding of the barriers and facilitators in establishing amyloidosis specialty clinics. Addressing these barriers and leveraging facilitators are crucial for shaping the future of amyloidosis care. These insights support a model for implementing integrated care for this growing patient population and highlight the need for further research to support policy development and effective implementation of these specialized clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信