左侧胰腺切除术胰瘘预测模型的国际多中心验证以及 DISPAIR-FRS 组合预测模型的开发和验证。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Akseli Bonsdorff, Trond Kjeseth, Jakob Kirkegård, Charles de Ponthaud, Poya Ghorbani, Johanna Wennerblom, Caroline Williamson, Alexandra W Acher, Manoj Thillai, Timo Tarvainen, Ilkka Helanterä, Aki Uutela, Jukka Sirén, Arto Kokkola, Mushegh Sahakyan, Dyre Kleive, Rolf Hagen, Andrea Lund, Mette F Nielsen, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, Richard Fristedt, Christina Biörserud, Svein O Bratlie, Bobby Tingstedt, Knut J Labori, Sébastien Gaujoux, Stephen J Wigmore, Julie Hallet, Ernesto Sparrelid, Ville Sallinen
{"title":"左侧胰腺切除术胰瘘预测模型的国际多中心验证以及 DISPAIR-FRS 组合预测模型的开发和验证。","authors":"Akseli Bonsdorff, Trond Kjeseth, Jakob Kirkegård, Charles de Ponthaud, Poya Ghorbani, Johanna Wennerblom, Caroline Williamson, Alexandra W Acher, Manoj Thillai, Timo Tarvainen, Ilkka Helanterä, Aki Uutela, Jukka Sirén, Arto Kokkola, Mushegh Sahakyan, Dyre Kleive, Rolf Hagen, Andrea Lund, Mette F Nielsen, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, Richard Fristedt, Christina Biörserud, Svein O Bratlie, Bobby Tingstedt, Knut J Labori, Sébastien Gaujoux, Stephen J Wigmore, Julie Hallet, Ernesto Sparrelid, Ville Sallinen","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Every fifth patient undergoing left pancreatectomy develops a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Accurate POPF risk prediction could help. Two independent preoperative prediction models have been developed and externally validated: DISPAIR and D-FRS. The aim of this study was to validate, compare, and possibly update the models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from nine high-volume pancreatic surgery centres (8 in Europe and 1 in North America) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years and open or minimally invasive left pancreatectomy since 2010. Model performance was assessed with discrimination (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves) and calibration (calibration plots). The updated model was developed with logistic regression and internally-externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2284 patients included, 497 (21.8%) developed POPF. Both DISPAIR (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.62) and D-FRS (AUC 0.62) performed suboptimally, both in the pooled validation cohort combining every centre's data and centre-wise. An updated model, named DISPAIR-FRS, was constructed by combining the most stable predictors from the existing models and incorporating other readily available patient demographics, such as age, sex, transection site, pancreatic thickness at the transection site, and main pancreatic duct diameter at the transection site. Internal-external validation demonstrated an AUC of 0.72, a calibration slope of 0.93, and an intercept of -0.02 for the updated model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined updated model of DISPAIR and D-FRS named DISPAIR-FRS demonstrated better performance and can be accessed at www.tinyurl.com/the-dispair-frs.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"112 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International multicentre validation of the left pancreatectomy pancreatic fistula prediction models and development and validation of the combined DISPAIR-FRS prediction model.\",\"authors\":\"Akseli Bonsdorff, Trond Kjeseth, Jakob Kirkegård, Charles de Ponthaud, Poya Ghorbani, Johanna Wennerblom, Caroline Williamson, Alexandra W Acher, Manoj Thillai, Timo Tarvainen, Ilkka Helanterä, Aki Uutela, Jukka Sirén, Arto Kokkola, Mushegh Sahakyan, Dyre Kleive, Rolf Hagen, Andrea Lund, Mette F Nielsen, Jean-Christophe Vaillant, Richard Fristedt, Christina Biörserud, Svein O Bratlie, Bobby Tingstedt, Knut J Labori, Sébastien Gaujoux, Stephen J Wigmore, Julie Hallet, Ernesto Sparrelid, Ville Sallinen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znae313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Every fifth patient undergoing left pancreatectomy develops a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Accurate POPF risk prediction could help. Two independent preoperative prediction models have been developed and externally validated: DISPAIR and D-FRS. The aim of this study was to validate, compare, and possibly update the models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from nine high-volume pancreatic surgery centres (8 in Europe and 1 in North America) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years and open or minimally invasive left pancreatectomy since 2010. Model performance was assessed with discrimination (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves) and calibration (calibration plots). The updated model was developed with logistic regression and internally-externally validated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2284 patients included, 497 (21.8%) developed POPF. Both DISPAIR (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.62) and D-FRS (AUC 0.62) performed suboptimally, both in the pooled validation cohort combining every centre's data and centre-wise. An updated model, named DISPAIR-FRS, was constructed by combining the most stable predictors from the existing models and incorporating other readily available patient demographics, such as age, sex, transection site, pancreatic thickness at the transection site, and main pancreatic duct diameter at the transection site. Internal-external validation demonstrated an AUC of 0.72, a calibration slope of 0.93, and an intercept of -0.02 for the updated model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combined updated model of DISPAIR and D-FRS named DISPAIR-FRS demonstrated better performance and can be accessed at www.tinyurl.com/the-dispair-frs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"112 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11926329/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae313\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae313","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International multicentre validation of the left pancreatectomy pancreatic fistula prediction models and development and validation of the combined DISPAIR-FRS prediction model.

Background: Every fifth patient undergoing left pancreatectomy develops a postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Accurate POPF risk prediction could help. Two independent preoperative prediction models have been developed and externally validated: DISPAIR and D-FRS. The aim of this study was to validate, compare, and possibly update the models.

Methods: Patients from nine high-volume pancreatic surgery centres (8 in Europe and 1 in North America) were included in this retrospective cohort study. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years and open or minimally invasive left pancreatectomy since 2010. Model performance was assessed with discrimination (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves) and calibration (calibration plots). The updated model was developed with logistic regression and internally-externally validated.

Results: Of 2284 patients included, 497 (21.8%) developed POPF. Both DISPAIR (area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.62) and D-FRS (AUC 0.62) performed suboptimally, both in the pooled validation cohort combining every centre's data and centre-wise. An updated model, named DISPAIR-FRS, was constructed by combining the most stable predictors from the existing models and incorporating other readily available patient demographics, such as age, sex, transection site, pancreatic thickness at the transection site, and main pancreatic duct diameter at the transection site. Internal-external validation demonstrated an AUC of 0.72, a calibration slope of 0.93, and an intercept of -0.02 for the updated model.

Conclusion: The combined updated model of DISPAIR and D-FRS named DISPAIR-FRS demonstrated better performance and can be accessed at www.tinyurl.com/the-dispair-frs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信