提高药品可及性:评估竞争性仿制药治疗独占性对仿制药快速进入美国市场的影响(2019-2024)

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mahesh Kisan Girhe, Sravani Yerram, Ajmal C. S, Muhammed Nizam V P, Ramesh Joga, Nuwaid Khader, Pujita Konda, Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi, Saurabh Srivastava
{"title":"提高药品可及性:评估竞争性仿制药治疗独占性对仿制药快速进入美国市场的影响(2019-2024)","authors":"Mahesh Kisan Girhe,&nbsp;Sravani Yerram,&nbsp;Ajmal C. S,&nbsp;Muhammed Nizam V P,&nbsp;Ramesh Joga,&nbsp;Nuwaid Khader,&nbsp;Pujita Konda,&nbsp;Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi,&nbsp;Saurabh Srivastava","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-09969-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The affordability and accessibility of generic medications drive their dominance in the U.S. market. Competitive Generic Therapy (CGT) exclusivity promotes efficient development, expedited market entry, and swift reviews for drugs with inadequate competition. This study examines CGT exclusivity approvals from January 2019 to October 2024, focusing on therapeutic areas with limited competition and the impact on patient access. Of 353 applications reviewed, 126 exclusivities granted from 2019 to 2023 were analysed. The average time to market was assessed, excluding 2024 due to unavailable marketing dates. One of the key findings of this study highlights the disparity in marketing timelines between generics approved for life-threatening versus non-serious conditions. While CGT-designated drugs for life-threatening conditions reach the market faster (21.53 days on average), those for non-serious conditions experience longer delays (29.56 days on average). External factors like market demand and competition risk greatly impact CGT exclusivity, driving manufacturers to prioritize critical therapies to trigger exclusivity while ensuring generic accessibility in the U.S. market. By analysing the landscape of CGT exclusivity approvals, this study emphasizes how these regulatory measures tackle areas of inadequate competition, thereby enabling quicker patient access to vital therapies. The research identifies how CGT exclusivity helps in rapid access to generic drugs in the U.S. market. In conclusion, this study underscores the effectiveness of CGT exclusivity in reducing time-to-market for generics, thereby improving accessibility and addressing gaps in competition. These insights emphasize the importance of regulatory measures like CGT exclusivity in promoting accessibility while addressing the broader challenges of generic competition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Enhancing Pharmaceutical Accessibility: Evaluating the Impact of Competitive Generic Therapy Exclusivity on Rapid Access of Generics into the U.S. Market (2019–2024)”\",\"authors\":\"Mahesh Kisan Girhe,&nbsp;Sravani Yerram,&nbsp;Ajmal C. S,&nbsp;Muhammed Nizam V P,&nbsp;Ramesh Joga,&nbsp;Nuwaid Khader,&nbsp;Pujita Konda,&nbsp;Rajeev Singh Raghuvanshi,&nbsp;Saurabh Srivastava\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-09969-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The affordability and accessibility of generic medications drive their dominance in the U.S. market. Competitive Generic Therapy (CGT) exclusivity promotes efficient development, expedited market entry, and swift reviews for drugs with inadequate competition. This study examines CGT exclusivity approvals from January 2019 to October 2024, focusing on therapeutic areas with limited competition and the impact on patient access. Of 353 applications reviewed, 126 exclusivities granted from 2019 to 2023 were analysed. The average time to market was assessed, excluding 2024 due to unavailable marketing dates. One of the key findings of this study highlights the disparity in marketing timelines between generics approved for life-threatening versus non-serious conditions. While CGT-designated drugs for life-threatening conditions reach the market faster (21.53 days on average), those for non-serious conditions experience longer delays (29.56 days on average). External factors like market demand and competition risk greatly impact CGT exclusivity, driving manufacturers to prioritize critical therapies to trigger exclusivity while ensuring generic accessibility in the U.S. market. By analysing the landscape of CGT exclusivity approvals, this study emphasizes how these regulatory measures tackle areas of inadequate competition, thereby enabling quicker patient access to vital therapies. The research identifies how CGT exclusivity helps in rapid access to generic drugs in the U.S. market. In conclusion, this study underscores the effectiveness of CGT exclusivity in reducing time-to-market for generics, thereby improving accessibility and addressing gaps in competition. These insights emphasize the importance of regulatory measures like CGT exclusivity in promoting accessibility while addressing the broader challenges of generic competition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-09969-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-09969-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

仿制药的可负担性和可获得性推动了它们在美国市场的主导地位。竞争性非专利治疗(CGT)的排他性促进了有效的开发,加速了市场进入,并对竞争不足的药物进行了快速审查。本研究考察了2019年1月至2024年10月期间CGT独占性批准,重点关注竞争有限的治疗领域及其对患者可及性的影响。在审查的353项申请中,分析了2019年至2023年授予的126项专有权。评估了平均上市时间,不包括2024年,因为无法获得上市日期。这项研究的一个重要发现强调了批准用于危及生命和非严重疾病的仿制药在上市时间上的差异。虽然cgt指定的治疗危及生命疾病的药物上市速度更快(平均21.53天),但治疗非严重疾病的药物上市时间较长(平均29.56天)。市场需求和竞争风险等外部因素极大地影响了CGT的排他性,促使制造商优先考虑关键疗法,以触发排他性,同时确保仿制药在美国市场的可及性。通过分析CGT独占性批准的前景,本研究强调了这些监管措施如何解决竞争不足的领域,从而使患者能够更快地获得重要的治疗。该研究确定了CGT的排他性如何帮助美国市场快速获得仿制药。总之,本研究强调了CGT独占性在缩短仿制药上市时间方面的有效性,从而改善可及性并解决竞争差距。这些见解强调了CGT排他性等监管措施在促进可及性的同时应对仿制药竞争的更广泛挑战的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“Enhancing Pharmaceutical Accessibility: Evaluating the Impact of Competitive Generic Therapy Exclusivity on Rapid Access of Generics into the U.S. Market (2019–2024)”

The affordability and accessibility of generic medications drive their dominance in the U.S. market. Competitive Generic Therapy (CGT) exclusivity promotes efficient development, expedited market entry, and swift reviews for drugs with inadequate competition. This study examines CGT exclusivity approvals from January 2019 to October 2024, focusing on therapeutic areas with limited competition and the impact on patient access. Of 353 applications reviewed, 126 exclusivities granted from 2019 to 2023 were analysed. The average time to market was assessed, excluding 2024 due to unavailable marketing dates. One of the key findings of this study highlights the disparity in marketing timelines between generics approved for life-threatening versus non-serious conditions. While CGT-designated drugs for life-threatening conditions reach the market faster (21.53 days on average), those for non-serious conditions experience longer delays (29.56 days on average). External factors like market demand and competition risk greatly impact CGT exclusivity, driving manufacturers to prioritize critical therapies to trigger exclusivity while ensuring generic accessibility in the U.S. market. By analysing the landscape of CGT exclusivity approvals, this study emphasizes how these regulatory measures tackle areas of inadequate competition, thereby enabling quicker patient access to vital therapies. The research identifies how CGT exclusivity helps in rapid access to generic drugs in the U.S. market. In conclusion, this study underscores the effectiveness of CGT exclusivity in reducing time-to-market for generics, thereby improving accessibility and addressing gaps in competition. These insights emphasize the importance of regulatory measures like CGT exclusivity in promoting accessibility while addressing the broader challenges of generic competition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信