农村门诺派社区围产期保健偏好:一项混合方法研究。

April E Ward, Barbara K Hackley, Emily C McGahey
{"title":"农村门诺派社区围产期保健偏好:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"April E Ward, Barbara K Hackley, Emily C McGahey","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A rapidly growing rural community of Old Order Mennonites in upstate New York abruptly lost midwifery services in 2018, causing a crisis in perinatal care access. A mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore health status, perinatal needs, and preferences in this culturally homogenous group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey mailed to 650 Mennonite families assessed demographic characteristics, general health, perinatal optimality, perinatal care characteristics, stress and anxiety related to rural childbearing, and preferences for a perinatal health care system. Voluntary follow-up telephone interviews explored recent perinatal experiences and desires for future care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were returned by 218 Mennonite women, a 33.5% response rate. Home birth was preferred by 94.6% of participants. The mean (SD) Perinatal Background Index score was 86.7% (11.7), indicating a high level of optimality. Elevated levels of stress and anxiety, as measured by the Rural Pregnancy Experience Scale, were reported by 12 participants (6.6%). Qualitative descriptive analysis of 21 interviews revealed a strong desire to preserve home birth, receive care that was respectful of Mennonite cultural norms, and maintain a personal choice of birth attendants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>According to participants, an ideal perinatal care system would ensure locally available, skilled midwives willing to maintain the community's traditional childbearing practices. Despite rural remoteness, distance from inpatient perinatal services was not associated with increased stress and anxiety. Access to care could be improved by state-level initiatives to expand the licensure of midwives and to remove barriers to birth center development.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perinatal Health Care Preferences in a Rural Mennonite Community: A Mixed-Methods Study.\",\"authors\":\"April E Ward, Barbara K Hackley, Emily C McGahey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmwh.13746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A rapidly growing rural community of Old Order Mennonites in upstate New York abruptly lost midwifery services in 2018, causing a crisis in perinatal care access. A mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore health status, perinatal needs, and preferences in this culturally homogenous group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An anonymous survey mailed to 650 Mennonite families assessed demographic characteristics, general health, perinatal optimality, perinatal care characteristics, stress and anxiety related to rural childbearing, and preferences for a perinatal health care system. Voluntary follow-up telephone interviews explored recent perinatal experiences and desires for future care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were returned by 218 Mennonite women, a 33.5% response rate. Home birth was preferred by 94.6% of participants. The mean (SD) Perinatal Background Index score was 86.7% (11.7), indicating a high level of optimality. Elevated levels of stress and anxiety, as measured by the Rural Pregnancy Experience Scale, were reported by 12 participants (6.6%). Qualitative descriptive analysis of 21 interviews revealed a strong desire to preserve home birth, receive care that was respectful of Mennonite cultural norms, and maintain a personal choice of birth attendants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>According to participants, an ideal perinatal care system would ensure locally available, skilled midwives willing to maintain the community's traditional childbearing practices. Despite rural remoteness, distance from inpatient perinatal services was not associated with increased stress and anxiety. Access to care could be improved by state-level initiatives to expand the licensure of midwives and to remove barriers to birth center development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of midwifery & women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:2018年,纽约州北部一个快速发展的旧秩序门诺派农村社区突然失去了助产服务,导致围产期护理机会危机。一项混合方法研究进行了探索健康状况,围产期需求,并在这一文化同质群体的偏好。方法:邮寄给650个门诺派家庭进行匿名调查,评估人口统计学特征、一般健康状况、围产期最佳状态、围产期护理特征、与农村生育有关的压力和焦虑,以及对围产期保健系统的偏好。自愿随访电话访谈探讨了近期围产期经历和对未来护理的期望。结果:218名门诺派女性参与了调查,回复率为33.5%。94.6%的参与者选择在家分娩。平均(SD)围产期背景指数评分为86.7%(11.7),显示出较高的优化水平。据农村怀孕体验量表测量,有12名参与者(6.6%)报告压力和焦虑水平升高。对21个访谈的定性描述分析显示,人们强烈希望保留在家分娩,接受尊重门诺文化规范的护理,并保留个人选择的助产士。讨论:与会者认为,一个理想的围产期护理系统将确保当地有熟练的助产士愿意维持社区的传统生育做法。尽管地处偏远,但与住院围产期服务的距离与压力和焦虑的增加无关。可以通过州一级的举措来改善获得护理的机会,以扩大助产士的执照,并消除生育中心发展的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perinatal Health Care Preferences in a Rural Mennonite Community: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Introduction: A rapidly growing rural community of Old Order Mennonites in upstate New York abruptly lost midwifery services in 2018, causing a crisis in perinatal care access. A mixed-methods study was undertaken to explore health status, perinatal needs, and preferences in this culturally homogenous group.

Methods: An anonymous survey mailed to 650 Mennonite families assessed demographic characteristics, general health, perinatal optimality, perinatal care characteristics, stress and anxiety related to rural childbearing, and preferences for a perinatal health care system. Voluntary follow-up telephone interviews explored recent perinatal experiences and desires for future care.

Results: Surveys were returned by 218 Mennonite women, a 33.5% response rate. Home birth was preferred by 94.6% of participants. The mean (SD) Perinatal Background Index score was 86.7% (11.7), indicating a high level of optimality. Elevated levels of stress and anxiety, as measured by the Rural Pregnancy Experience Scale, were reported by 12 participants (6.6%). Qualitative descriptive analysis of 21 interviews revealed a strong desire to preserve home birth, receive care that was respectful of Mennonite cultural norms, and maintain a personal choice of birth attendants.

Discussion: According to participants, an ideal perinatal care system would ensure locally available, skilled midwives willing to maintain the community's traditional childbearing practices. Despite rural remoteness, distance from inpatient perinatal services was not associated with increased stress and anxiety. Access to care could be improved by state-level initiatives to expand the licensure of midwives and to remove barriers to birth center development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信