通过提高质量教育策略提高学术产出。

IF 1.2 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Pediatric quality & safety Pub Date : 2025-03-13 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804
Hannah Stuart, Sangeeta Schroeder, Abbey Studer, Derek Wheeler, Jennifer Lavin, Caitlin Naureckas Li
{"title":"通过提高质量教育策略提高学术产出。","authors":"Hannah Stuart, Sangeeta Schroeder, Abbey Studer, Derek Wheeler, Jennifer Lavin, Caitlin Naureckas Li","doi":"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) work is imperative to support health systems in providing safe and effective care. Conflicting demands, including the need to complete standard work recognized for academic promotion, can hinder meaningful participation in QI work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our quaternary pediatric hospital, we completed a series of plan-do-study-act cycles around developing QI educational opportunities. Our outcome measure was the number of publications containing the phrase \"Quality Improvement\" with at least 1 author from our institution. Our process measures included the cumulative number of employees trained in QI methods or writing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of publications increased significantly from an average of 3.4 to 12.5 per quarter. The total number of employees trained in QI methods and QI writing increased throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A series of interventions designed to increase the QI fluency of our workforce were associated with an increase in the number of QI publications at our institution.</p>","PeriodicalId":74412,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric quality & safety","volume":"10 2","pages":"e804"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922458/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing Academic Output through Quality Improvement Educational Strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Stuart, Sangeeta Schroeder, Abbey Studer, Derek Wheeler, Jennifer Lavin, Caitlin Naureckas Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality improvement (QI) work is imperative to support health systems in providing safe and effective care. Conflicting demands, including the need to complete standard work recognized for academic promotion, can hinder meaningful participation in QI work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>At our quaternary pediatric hospital, we completed a series of plan-do-study-act cycles around developing QI educational opportunities. Our outcome measure was the number of publications containing the phrase \\\"Quality Improvement\\\" with at least 1 author from our institution. Our process measures included the cumulative number of employees trained in QI methods or writing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of publications increased significantly from an average of 3.4 to 12.5 per quarter. The total number of employees trained in QI methods and QI writing increased throughout the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A series of interventions designed to increase the QI fluency of our workforce were associated with an increase in the number of QI publications at our institution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"e804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11922458/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric quality & safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric quality & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000804","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质量改进工作是支持卫生系统提供安全和有效护理的必要条件。相互冲突的需求,包括需要完成学术推广认可的标准工作,可能会阻碍对QI工作的有意义的参与。方法:在我们的第四儿科医院,我们围绕发展QI教育机会完成了一系列计划-实施-研究-行动循环。我们的结果测量是包含“质量改进”一词且至少有一位作者来自我们机构的出版物的数量。我们的过程测量包括接受过QI方法或书面培训的员工的累积数量。结果:论文发表数量从平均每季度3.4篇显著增加到12.5篇。在整个研究期间,接受QI方法和QI写作培训的员工总数有所增加。结论:一系列旨在提高我们员工的QI流畅性的干预措施与我们机构QI出版物数量的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing Academic Output through Quality Improvement Educational Strategies.

Introduction: Quality improvement (QI) work is imperative to support health systems in providing safe and effective care. Conflicting demands, including the need to complete standard work recognized for academic promotion, can hinder meaningful participation in QI work.

Methods: At our quaternary pediatric hospital, we completed a series of plan-do-study-act cycles around developing QI educational opportunities. Our outcome measure was the number of publications containing the phrase "Quality Improvement" with at least 1 author from our institution. Our process measures included the cumulative number of employees trained in QI methods or writing.

Results: The number of publications increased significantly from an average of 3.4 to 12.5 per quarter. The total number of employees trained in QI methods and QI writing increased throughout the study period.

Conclusions: A series of interventions designed to increase the QI fluency of our workforce were associated with an increase in the number of QI publications at our institution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信