IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sungchul Park, Jie Chen, Arturo Vargas Bustamante, Alexander N Ortega
{"title":"Does Low-Value Care Explain Health Care Utilization Inequities Among Asian and Latino Populations?","authors":"Sungchul Park, Jie Chen, Arturo Vargas Bustamante, Alexander N Ortega","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine differences in the utilization of low-value care among Asian and Latino subpopulations compared to the White population.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional national survey.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytical sample: </strong>Our sample included a non-Latino White population and Asian and Latino subpopulation groups using data from the 2013-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Asian and Latino subpopulations used health care services less frequently than the White population, with adjusted differences ranging from -3.2% points (95% CI: -3.9, -2.4) to -9.4 (-10.1, -8.7) for outpatient visits, -5.2 (-5.9, -4.5) to -12.4 (-15.2, -9.6) for office-based provider visits, and -5.2 (-6.7, -3.8) to -19.1 (-21.6, -16.7) for prescription drug fills. Although certain low-value services were reported less among Asian and Latino subpopulations, there were no differences in almost six out of twelve services when compared to the White population. These patterns were notable among Asian subpopulations (Indians, Chinese, Filipinos, and other Asians). Additionally, Asian and Latino subpopulation groups had distinct patterns in the use of low-value care. Compared to the White population, Asian subpopulation groups had lower utilization of low-value medications including benzodiazepines for depression (-11.5 [-15.1, -8.0] to -13.8 [-24.4, -3.3]) and opioids for back pain (-4.4 [-8.5, -0.3] to -10.1 [-13.6, -6.7]). Latino subpopulation groups had higher utilization of low-value cervical cancer screening (5.7 [3.0-8.4] to 24.5 [16.9-32.1]) and lower utilization of magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for back pain (-1.6 [-2.4, -0.8] to -4.9 [-7.1, -2.6]) than the White population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite lower overall health care utilization, Asian and Latino subpopulations do not necessarily use the low-value care examined in this study less than the White population. This suggests that lower overall health care utilization among Asian and Latino subpopulations may not solely be attributed to lower use of low-value care.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14610"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14610","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的研究背景与设计:我们分析了重复横断面全国调查的数据:数据来源和分析样本:我们的样本包括非拉丁裔白人、亚裔和拉丁裔亚人群,数据来自 2013-2021 年医疗支出小组调查:亚裔和拉丁裔亚群使用医疗保健服务的频率低于白人,调整后的差异从-3.2%点(95% CI:-3.9,-2.4)到-9.4(-10.1,-8.7)不等。1,-8.7),门诊就诊差异为-5.2(-5.9,-4.5)至-12.4(-15.2,-9.6),处方药配药差异为-5.2(-6.7,-3.8)至-19.1(-21.6,-16.7)。虽然亚裔和拉丁裔亚群报告的某些低价值服务较少,但与白人相比,12 项服务中几乎有 6 项没有差异。这些模式在亚裔亚群(印度人、中国人、菲律宾人和其他亚洲人)中尤为明显。此外,亚裔和拉丁裔亚人群在使用低价值护理方面也有独特的模式。与白人相比,亚裔亚人口群体对低价值药物的使用率较低,包括治疗抑郁症的苯二氮卓类药物(-11.5 [-15.1, -8.0]至-13.8 [-24.4, -3.3])和治疗背痛的阿片类药物(-4.4 [-8.5, -0.3]至-10.1 [-13.6, -6.7])。与白人相比,拉丁裔亚人群对低价值宫颈癌筛查的利用率更高(5.7 [3.0-8.4] 到 24.5 [16.9-32.1]),对治疗背痛的磁共振成像/计算机断层扫描的利用率更低(-1.6 [-2.4, -0.8] 到 -4.9 [-7.1, -2.6]):结论:尽管亚裔和拉丁裔亚群的总体医疗保健使用率较低,但他们在本研究中使用的低价值医疗保健并不一定少于白人。这表明,亚裔和拉丁裔亚群总体医疗保健使用率较低可能并不完全是因为低价值医疗保健使用率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Low-Value Care Explain Health Care Utilization Inequities Among Asian and Latino Populations?

Objectives: To examine differences in the utilization of low-value care among Asian and Latino subpopulations compared to the White population.

Study setting and design: We analyzed data from a repeated cross-sectional national survey.

Data sources and analytical sample: Our sample included a non-Latino White population and Asian and Latino subpopulation groups using data from the 2013-2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Principal findings: Asian and Latino subpopulations used health care services less frequently than the White population, with adjusted differences ranging from -3.2% points (95% CI: -3.9, -2.4) to -9.4 (-10.1, -8.7) for outpatient visits, -5.2 (-5.9, -4.5) to -12.4 (-15.2, -9.6) for office-based provider visits, and -5.2 (-6.7, -3.8) to -19.1 (-21.6, -16.7) for prescription drug fills. Although certain low-value services were reported less among Asian and Latino subpopulations, there were no differences in almost six out of twelve services when compared to the White population. These patterns were notable among Asian subpopulations (Indians, Chinese, Filipinos, and other Asians). Additionally, Asian and Latino subpopulation groups had distinct patterns in the use of low-value care. Compared to the White population, Asian subpopulation groups had lower utilization of low-value medications including benzodiazepines for depression (-11.5 [-15.1, -8.0] to -13.8 [-24.4, -3.3]) and opioids for back pain (-4.4 [-8.5, -0.3] to -10.1 [-13.6, -6.7]). Latino subpopulation groups had higher utilization of low-value cervical cancer screening (5.7 [3.0-8.4] to 24.5 [16.9-32.1]) and lower utilization of magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography for back pain (-1.6 [-2.4, -0.8] to -4.9 [-7.1, -2.6]) than the White population.

Conclusions: Despite lower overall health care utilization, Asian and Latino subpopulations do not necessarily use the low-value care examined in this study less than the White population. This suggests that lower overall health care utilization among Asian and Latino subpopulations may not solely be attributed to lower use of low-value care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信