遗传性结直肠癌患者基因检测后的经验与期望

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Emily Stuebing, Jessica Jonas, Shelley McCormick, Carly Grant, Margaret Emmet
{"title":"遗传性结直肠癌患者基因检测后的经验与期望","authors":"Emily Stuebing,&nbsp;Jessica Jonas,&nbsp;Shelley McCormick,&nbsp;Carly Grant,&nbsp;Margaret Emmet","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.2012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Individuals with inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) risk often work with genetic counselors (GCs) who traditionally meet with them prior to genetic testing and then disclose genetic test (GT) results. After results disclosure, many GCs do not typically provide long-term follow-up, and as a result, there is little in the literature regarding how GCs can meet the needs of patients in the post-test period. This mixed methods study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with hereditary CRC syndromes in the post-test period with a focus on identifying areas for improvement following a positive GT result. Participants completed an online survey (<i>N</i> = 17) and optional semi-structured interview (<i>N</i> = 10) focused on patient experiences with GCs, resources received following a positive GT result, degree of perceived support from their GC, and psychosocial considerations associated with GT. The survey data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel to generate descriptive statistics, and the interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Survey results indicated that participants would like an increase in contact with their GC in the post-test period and prefer follow-up visits to be scheduled in advance. Interview results revealed several themes including: meaning making, emotional reaction, impact of GC, recommendations for GC, and perceived health literacy. The data demonstrates a need to reconsider the effectiveness and structure of clinical follow-up after a positive GT disclosure. In the post-test period, GCs should attempt to meet needs specific to the patient in addition to providing follow-up tailored to a patient's emotional state, information needs, and life circumstances. Further needs assessment with greater focus on diverse groups and a larger cohort may be necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.2012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and expectations of hereditary colorectal cancer patients during the post-genetic test period\",\"authors\":\"Emily Stuebing,&nbsp;Jessica Jonas,&nbsp;Shelley McCormick,&nbsp;Carly Grant,&nbsp;Margaret Emmet\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.2012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Individuals with inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) risk often work with genetic counselors (GCs) who traditionally meet with them prior to genetic testing and then disclose genetic test (GT) results. After results disclosure, many GCs do not typically provide long-term follow-up, and as a result, there is little in the literature regarding how GCs can meet the needs of patients in the post-test period. This mixed methods study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with hereditary CRC syndromes in the post-test period with a focus on identifying areas for improvement following a positive GT result. Participants completed an online survey (<i>N</i> = 17) and optional semi-structured interview (<i>N</i> = 10) focused on patient experiences with GCs, resources received following a positive GT result, degree of perceived support from their GC, and psychosocial considerations associated with GT. The survey data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel to generate descriptive statistics, and the interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Survey results indicated that participants would like an increase in contact with their GC in the post-test period and prefer follow-up visits to be scheduled in advance. Interview results revealed several themes including: meaning making, emotional reaction, impact of GC, recommendations for GC, and perceived health literacy. The data demonstrates a need to reconsider the effectiveness and structure of clinical follow-up after a positive GT disclosure. In the post-test period, GCs should attempt to meet needs specific to the patient in addition to providing follow-up tailored to a patient's emotional state, information needs, and life circumstances. Further needs assessment with greater focus on diverse groups and a larger cohort may be necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.2012\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.2012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.2012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有遗传性结直肠癌(CRC)风险的人通常会与遗传咨询师(GC)合作,传统上,遗传咨询师会在基因检测前与他们会面,然后公开基因检测(GT)结果。结果披露后,许多遗传咨询师通常不会提供长期随访,因此,关于遗传咨询师如何满足患者检测后需求的文献很少。这项混合方法研究旨在探讨遗传性 CRC 综合征患者在检测后的经历,重点是找出 GT 阳性结果后需要改进的地方。参与者完成了一项在线调查(17 人)和可选的半结构式访谈(10 人),重点是患者与 GC 的经历、GT 阳性结果后获得的资源、GC 提供的支持程度以及与 GT 相关的社会心理因素。调查数据使用 Microsoft Excel 进行分析,生成描述性统计数字,访谈数据则使用反思性主题分析法进行分析。调查结果显示,参与者希望在测试后与他们的 GC 增加联系,并希望能提前安排后续访问。访谈结果显示了几个主题,包括:意义建构、情绪反应、GC 的影响、对 GC 的建议以及对健康知识的认知。这些数据表明,有必要重新考虑 GT 阳性披露后临床随访的有效性和结构。在测试后阶段,除了根据患者的情绪状态、信息需求和生活环境提供后续服务外,GC 还应努力满足患者的特定需求。可能有必要进一步进行需求评估,更加关注不同群体和更大的群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Experiences and expectations of hereditary colorectal cancer patients during the post-genetic test period

Experiences and expectations of hereditary colorectal cancer patients during the post-genetic test period

Individuals with inherited colorectal cancer (CRC) risk often work with genetic counselors (GCs) who traditionally meet with them prior to genetic testing and then disclose genetic test (GT) results. After results disclosure, many GCs do not typically provide long-term follow-up, and as a result, there is little in the literature regarding how GCs can meet the needs of patients in the post-test period. This mixed methods study aimed to explore the experiences of patients with hereditary CRC syndromes in the post-test period with a focus on identifying areas for improvement following a positive GT result. Participants completed an online survey (N = 17) and optional semi-structured interview (N = 10) focused on patient experiences with GCs, resources received following a positive GT result, degree of perceived support from their GC, and psychosocial considerations associated with GT. The survey data was analyzed using Microsoft Excel to generate descriptive statistics, and the interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Survey results indicated that participants would like an increase in contact with their GC in the post-test period and prefer follow-up visits to be scheduled in advance. Interview results revealed several themes including: meaning making, emotional reaction, impact of GC, recommendations for GC, and perceived health literacy. The data demonstrates a need to reconsider the effectiveness and structure of clinical follow-up after a positive GT disclosure. In the post-test period, GCs should attempt to meet needs specific to the patient in addition to providing follow-up tailored to a patient's emotional state, information needs, and life circumstances. Further needs assessment with greater focus on diverse groups and a larger cohort may be necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信