{"title":"全球校级学生乳腺癌知识的系统回顾。","authors":"Camila U Malfatto, Gloria M Calaf","doi":"10.1007/s13187-025-02602-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer knowledge and the practice of breast self-examination among school students are crucial topics in health education due to the high incidence rate. However, there is little research on this subject. This systematic review aims to synthesize the empirical literature on the topic, analyzing and identifying patterns in the learning strategies and evaluation methodologies used. A systematic search, following the PRISMA method across the Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases, found only six studies published between 2000 and 2021 that focused on school education. The results revealed a significant lack of explicit and detailed educational interventions. Only two studies included educational interventions, but both lacked specific methodological details, limiting the ability to assess their effectiveness and replicate the results. While cross-sectional studies are useful for evaluating general knowledge, they did not sufficiently explore the underlying causes of knowledge deficiencies, nor did they propose strategies to address them. There is an urgent need to develop detailed and well-documented educational interventions on breast cancer within school contexts. This review provides an initial foundation and suggests that future research should address the identified methodological gaps to effectively contribute to health education and breast cancer prevention in young populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Breast Cancer Knowledge Among School-Level Students Worldwide.\",\"authors\":\"Camila U Malfatto, Gloria M Calaf\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-025-02602-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Breast cancer knowledge and the practice of breast self-examination among school students are crucial topics in health education due to the high incidence rate. However, there is little research on this subject. This systematic review aims to synthesize the empirical literature on the topic, analyzing and identifying patterns in the learning strategies and evaluation methodologies used. A systematic search, following the PRISMA method across the Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases, found only six studies published between 2000 and 2021 that focused on school education. The results revealed a significant lack of explicit and detailed educational interventions. Only two studies included educational interventions, but both lacked specific methodological details, limiting the ability to assess their effectiveness and replicate the results. While cross-sectional studies are useful for evaluating general knowledge, they did not sufficiently explore the underlying causes of knowledge deficiencies, nor did they propose strategies to address them. There is an urgent need to develop detailed and well-documented educational interventions on breast cancer within school contexts. This review provides an initial foundation and suggests that future research should address the identified methodological gaps to effectively contribute to health education and breast cancer prevention in young populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02602-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-025-02602-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
由于乳腺癌的高发病率,在校学生的乳腺癌知识和乳房自检实践是健康教育的重要主题。然而,关于这个问题的研究很少。本系统综述旨在综合有关该主题的实证文献,分析和识别学习策略和使用的评估方法的模式。按照PRISMA方法在Scopus、Web of Science和ERIC数据库中进行了系统搜索,发现2000年至2021年间发表的关于学校教育的研究只有6项。结果显示,明显缺乏明确和详细的教育干预。只有两项研究包括教育干预,但都缺乏具体的方法细节,限制了评估其有效性和复制结果的能力。虽然横断面研究对评估一般知识是有用的,但它们没有充分探索知识不足的潜在原因,也没有提出解决这些问题的策略。迫切需要在学校环境中制定详细的、有充分记录的关于乳腺癌的教育干预措施。这篇综述提供了一个初步的基础,并建议未来的研究应解决已确定的方法差距,以有效地促进年轻人群的健康教育和乳腺癌预防。
A Systematic Review of Breast Cancer Knowledge Among School-Level Students Worldwide.
Breast cancer knowledge and the practice of breast self-examination among school students are crucial topics in health education due to the high incidence rate. However, there is little research on this subject. This systematic review aims to synthesize the empirical literature on the topic, analyzing and identifying patterns in the learning strategies and evaluation methodologies used. A systematic search, following the PRISMA method across the Scopus, Web of Science, and ERIC databases, found only six studies published between 2000 and 2021 that focused on school education. The results revealed a significant lack of explicit and detailed educational interventions. Only two studies included educational interventions, but both lacked specific methodological details, limiting the ability to assess their effectiveness and replicate the results. While cross-sectional studies are useful for evaluating general knowledge, they did not sufficiently explore the underlying causes of knowledge deficiencies, nor did they propose strategies to address them. There is an urgent need to develop detailed and well-documented educational interventions on breast cancer within school contexts. This review provides an initial foundation and suggests that future research should address the identified methodological gaps to effectively contribute to health education and breast cancer prevention in young populations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.