Rachel Y Lee, Jennifer Thate, Jennifer Withall, Po-Yin Yen, Kenrick Cato, Sarah C Rossetti
{"title":"额外所需护理文件与患者预后之间的关系:范围审查。","authors":"Rachel Y Lee, Jennifer Thate, Jennifer Withall, Po-Yin Yen, Kenrick Cato, Sarah C Rossetti","doi":"10.1055/a-2561-3960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although many aspects of nursing documentation are considered an essential part of clinical communication and care coordination, other types of nursing documentation have been implemented to meet compliance and secondary uses. Adding required documentation without carefully assessing its association with patient outcomes adds excessive documentation burden on nurses. There is a gap in the evidence of the association between additional required nursing documentation and improvements in patient outcomes.This study aimed to synthesize and describe the state of the evidence on the relationship between adding required electronic nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes in inpatient hospital settings.Databases were searched using relevant terms for original studies examining the effects of additional required nursing documentation. Two authors screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility criteria. PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, and Embase were searched for data from January 2011 to May 2023.A total of 47 studies were included. Of the studies reviewed, 57.4% (<i>n</i> = 27) focused only on process measures, primarily measuring documentation compliance, and 42.6% (<i>n</i> = 20) studies included patient outcome measures such as infection rates, length of stay, and falls. Of these studies 45% (<i>n</i> = 9) reported statistically significant relationship between required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes. Overall quality of evidence was generally low, with 72% (<i>n</i> = 34) being quality improvement studies and only one study being a randomized controlled trial.The findings of this scoping review suggest an assumed, yet unverified, connection between added required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes that is not substantiated by high-quality empirical evidence. The paucity of studies with significant findings-and the methodological weaknesses of those that report them-suggest the need for critical examination of documentation practices that are truly beneficial to patient outcomes versus those documentation practices that are excessively burdensome.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":"628-639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240665/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between Additional Required Nursing Documentation and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Y Lee, Jennifer Thate, Jennifer Withall, Po-Yin Yen, Kenrick Cato, Sarah C Rossetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2561-3960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although many aspects of nursing documentation are considered an essential part of clinical communication and care coordination, other types of nursing documentation have been implemented to meet compliance and secondary uses. Adding required documentation without carefully assessing its association with patient outcomes adds excessive documentation burden on nurses. There is a gap in the evidence of the association between additional required nursing documentation and improvements in patient outcomes.This study aimed to synthesize and describe the state of the evidence on the relationship between adding required electronic nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes in inpatient hospital settings.Databases were searched using relevant terms for original studies examining the effects of additional required nursing documentation. Two authors screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility criteria. PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, and Embase were searched for data from January 2011 to May 2023.A total of 47 studies were included. Of the studies reviewed, 57.4% (<i>n</i> = 27) focused only on process measures, primarily measuring documentation compliance, and 42.6% (<i>n</i> = 20) studies included patient outcome measures such as infection rates, length of stay, and falls. Of these studies 45% (<i>n</i> = 9) reported statistically significant relationship between required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes. Overall quality of evidence was generally low, with 72% (<i>n</i> = 34) being quality improvement studies and only one study being a randomized controlled trial.The findings of this scoping review suggest an assumed, yet unverified, connection between added required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes that is not substantiated by high-quality empirical evidence. The paucity of studies with significant findings-and the methodological weaknesses of those that report them-suggest the need for critical examination of documentation practices that are truly beneficial to patient outcomes versus those documentation practices that are excessively burdensome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"628-639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12240665/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2561-3960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2561-3960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:虽然护理文件的许多方面被认为是临床沟通和护理协调的重要组成部分,但其他类型的护理文件已被实施,以满足依从性和其他次要使用需求。在没有仔细评估其与患者预后的关系的情况下添加所需的文件会给护士增加过多的文件负担。在额外所需的护理文件与患者预后改善之间的关联证据方面存在差距。目的:综合和描述在住院医院环境中增加必要的电子护理文件与改善患者预后之间关系的证据状态。方法:使用相关的原始研究术语检索数据库,以检查额外所需护理文件的影响。两位作者筛选了题目、摘要和全文的资格标准。数据来源:PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, Embase, 2011年1月- 2023年5月。结果:共纳入47项研究。在回顾的研究中,57.4% (n=27)只关注过程测量,主要测量文件依从性,42.6% (n=20)的研究包括患者结果测量,如感染率、住院时间和跌倒。在这些研究中,45% (n=9)报告了所需护理文件与改善患者预后之间的统计学显著关系。证据的总体质量普遍较低,72% (n=34)是质量改善研究,只有一项研究是随机对照试验。结论:这一范围综述的发现表明,在增加所需护理文件和改善患者预后之间存在假设但未经证实的联系,这一联系没有得到高质量经验证据的证实。具有重大发现的研究的缺乏以及报告这些发现的方法学上的弱点表明,需要对真正有利于患者预后的文献实践进行批判性检查,而不是那些过于繁重的文献实践。
Relationship between Additional Required Nursing Documentation and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review.
Although many aspects of nursing documentation are considered an essential part of clinical communication and care coordination, other types of nursing documentation have been implemented to meet compliance and secondary uses. Adding required documentation without carefully assessing its association with patient outcomes adds excessive documentation burden on nurses. There is a gap in the evidence of the association between additional required nursing documentation and improvements in patient outcomes.This study aimed to synthesize and describe the state of the evidence on the relationship between adding required electronic nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes in inpatient hospital settings.Databases were searched using relevant terms for original studies examining the effects of additional required nursing documentation. Two authors screened titles, abstracts, and full texts for eligibility criteria. PubMed, CINAHL (EBSCO), Web of Science, and Embase were searched for data from January 2011 to May 2023.A total of 47 studies were included. Of the studies reviewed, 57.4% (n = 27) focused only on process measures, primarily measuring documentation compliance, and 42.6% (n = 20) studies included patient outcome measures such as infection rates, length of stay, and falls. Of these studies 45% (n = 9) reported statistically significant relationship between required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes. Overall quality of evidence was generally low, with 72% (n = 34) being quality improvement studies and only one study being a randomized controlled trial.The findings of this scoping review suggest an assumed, yet unverified, connection between added required nursing documentation and improved patient outcomes that is not substantiated by high-quality empirical evidence. The paucity of studies with significant findings-and the methodological weaknesses of those that report them-suggest the need for critical examination of documentation practices that are truly beneficial to patient outcomes versus those documentation practices that are excessively burdensome.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.