在一个工作不稳定的世界里，劳动分工有什么意义？

IF 5.4 2区生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1098/rstb.2023.0279

Deborah James

{"title":"在一个工作不稳定的世界里，劳动分工有什么意义？","authors":"Deborah James","doi":"10.1098/rstb.2023.0279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-Marx, social scientists have tended to define 'labour' as working for others in return for a wage rather than as a harmonious Durkheimian-style interdependency. This mini-review of recent anthropological literature considers whether, in a world where the 'standard employment contract' is dwindling and many are out of work, 'division of labour' has any continuing relevance.This article is part of the theme issue 'Division of labour as key driver of social evolution'.","PeriodicalId":19872,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","volume":"380 1922","pages":"20230279"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What relevance has division of labour in a world of precarious work?\",\"authors\":\"Deborah James\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rstb.2023.0279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Post-Marx, social scientists have tended to define 'labour' as working for others in return for a wage rather than as a harmonious Durkheimian-style interdependency. This mini-review of recent anthropological literature considers whether, in a world where the 'standard employment contract' is dwindling and many are out of work, 'division of labour' has any continuing relevance.This article is part of the theme issue 'Division of labour as key driver of social evolution'.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19872,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"380 1922\",\"pages\":\"20230279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11923615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0279\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2023.0279","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

后马克思时代，社会科学家倾向于将“劳动”定义为为他人工作以换取工资，而不是迪尔凯姆式的和谐的相互依赖。这篇对最近人类学文献的迷你回顾考虑了在一个“标准雇佣合同”正在减少，许多人失业的世界里，“劳动分工”是否有任何持续的相关性。本文是“劳动分工是社会进化的关键驱动力”主题的一部分。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

What relevance has division of labour in a world of precarious work?

Post-Marx, social scientists have tended to define 'labour' as working for others in return for a wage rather than as a harmonious Durkheimian-style interdependency. This mini-review of recent anthropological literature considers whether, in a world where the 'standard employment contract' is dwindling and many are out of work, 'division of labour' has any continuing relevance.This article is part of the theme issue 'Division of labour as key driver of social evolution'.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 生物-生物学

CiteScore

11.80

自引率

1.60%

发文量

365

审稿时长

3 months

期刊介绍： The journal publishes topics across the life sciences. As long as the core subject lies within the biological sciences, some issues may also include content crossing into other areas such as the physical sciences, social sciences, biophysics, policy, economics etc. Issues generally sit within four broad areas (although many issues sit across these areas): Organismal, environmental and evolutionary biology Neuroscience and cognition Cellular, molecular and developmental biology Health and disease.