Bryce Thomsen, Danny Vesprini, Eshetu Atenafu, Jay Detsky, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Chai-Lin Tseng, Kang Liang Zeng, Beibei Zhang, Arjun Sahgal, Hanbo Chen
{"title":"用立体定向放射治疗乳腺癌脊柱转移:患者预后和预测因素。","authors":"Bryce Thomsen, Danny Vesprini, Eshetu Atenafu, Jay Detsky, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Chai-Lin Tseng, Kang Liang Zeng, Beibei Zhang, Arjun Sahgal, Hanbo Chen","doi":"10.1007/s11060-025-04998-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for oligometastatic and symptomatic breast cancer spinal metastases (BCSM), yet primary site-specific outcomes remain lacking. This study evaluates outcomes of SBRT for BCSM, focusing on predictors of local failure (LF), vertebral compression fraction (VCF) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 409 BCSM in 168 patients treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2022. Receptor status was grouped based on ER+/Her2-, HER2+, and ER-/HER2-. Follow-up included full-spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical assessment every 3-6 months post-SBRT. The primary endpoint was radiological LF, and secondary endpoints were OS and VCF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 3.3-123 months), most were ECOG 0-1 (95%), neurologically intact (94%), polymetastatic (> 5 metastases, 45%), and ER+/HER2- (79%). Of 409 segments, most had no prior radiation or surgery (76%), were SINS stable (60%) and treated with 24-28 Gy/2 fractions (73%). Five-year LF, OS and VCF rates were 14%, 45% and 11%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, lower LF rates were associated with < 2 lines of prior systemic therapy, low/no grade epidural disease, and greater equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 2) to the spinal cord/thecal sac (HR = 0.97 per 1 Gy increase, 95% CI: 0.949-0.995, p = 0.019). ER-/HER2-, liver and lung metastases, and > 2 systemic therapy lines predicted worse OS. Baseline VCF and deformity were associated with a higher VCF risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment intensification in those heavily systemically pretreated or with high-grade epidural disease may optimize long-term LF rates independent of molecular status.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"409-418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breast cancer spine metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: patient outcomes and predictors.\",\"authors\":\"Bryce Thomsen, Danny Vesprini, Eshetu Atenafu, Jay Detsky, Jeremie Larouche, Pejman Maralani, Sten Myrehaug, Hany Soliman, Chai-Lin Tseng, Kang Liang Zeng, Beibei Zhang, Arjun Sahgal, Hanbo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11060-025-04998-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/purpose: </strong>Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for oligometastatic and symptomatic breast cancer spinal metastases (BCSM), yet primary site-specific outcomes remain lacking. This study evaluates outcomes of SBRT for BCSM, focusing on predictors of local failure (LF), vertebral compression fraction (VCF) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 409 BCSM in 168 patients treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2022. Receptor status was grouped based on ER+/Her2-, HER2+, and ER-/HER2-. Follow-up included full-spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical assessment every 3-6 months post-SBRT. The primary endpoint was radiological LF, and secondary endpoints were OS and VCF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 3.3-123 months), most were ECOG 0-1 (95%), neurologically intact (94%), polymetastatic (> 5 metastases, 45%), and ER+/HER2- (79%). Of 409 segments, most had no prior radiation or surgery (76%), were SINS stable (60%) and treated with 24-28 Gy/2 fractions (73%). Five-year LF, OS and VCF rates were 14%, 45% and 11%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, lower LF rates were associated with < 2 lines of prior systemic therapy, low/no grade epidural disease, and greater equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 2) to the spinal cord/thecal sac (HR = 0.97 per 1 Gy increase, 95% CI: 0.949-0.995, p = 0.019). ER-/HER2-, liver and lung metastases, and > 2 systemic therapy lines predicted worse OS. Baseline VCF and deformity were associated with a higher VCF risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment intensification in those heavily systemically pretreated or with high-grade epidural disease may optimize long-term LF rates independent of molecular status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"409-418\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neuro-Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04998-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-025-04998-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Breast cancer spine metastases treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: patient outcomes and predictors.
Background/purpose: Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is increasingly utilized for oligometastatic and symptomatic breast cancer spinal metastases (BCSM), yet primary site-specific outcomes remain lacking. This study evaluates outcomes of SBRT for BCSM, focusing on predictors of local failure (LF), vertebral compression fraction (VCF) and overall survival (OS).
Materials/methods: We retrospectively analyzed 409 BCSM in 168 patients treated with SBRT between 2008 and 2022. Receptor status was grouped based on ER+/Her2-, HER2+, and ER-/HER2-. Follow-up included full-spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical assessment every 3-6 months post-SBRT. The primary endpoint was radiological LF, and secondary endpoints were OS and VCF.
Results: Median follow-up was 33 months (range, 3.3-123 months), most were ECOG 0-1 (95%), neurologically intact (94%), polymetastatic (> 5 metastases, 45%), and ER+/HER2- (79%). Of 409 segments, most had no prior radiation or surgery (76%), were SINS stable (60%) and treated with 24-28 Gy/2 fractions (73%). Five-year LF, OS and VCF rates were 14%, 45% and 11%, respectively. On multivariable analyses, lower LF rates were associated with < 2 lines of prior systemic therapy, low/no grade epidural disease, and greater equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (α/β = 2) to the spinal cord/thecal sac (HR = 0.97 per 1 Gy increase, 95% CI: 0.949-0.995, p = 0.019). ER-/HER2-, liver and lung metastases, and > 2 systemic therapy lines predicted worse OS. Baseline VCF and deformity were associated with a higher VCF risk.
Conclusion: Treatment intensification in those heavily systemically pretreated or with high-grade epidural disease may optimize long-term LF rates independent of molecular status.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.