加拿大创伤外科教育机会:一周的创伤服务生活。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-03-19 Print Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.014923
Kevin Verhoeff, Logan Richard, Matt Guttman, Barbara Haas, Chad Ball, Nawaf Al Shahwan, Kosar Ali Khwaja, Paul Engels, Emilie Joos, Kelly Vogt, Matt Strickland, Samuel Minor, Nori Bradley
{"title":"加拿大创伤外科教育机会:一周的创伤服务生活。","authors":"Kevin Verhoeff, Logan Richard, Matt Guttman, Barbara Haas, Chad Ball, Nawaf Al Shahwan, Kosar Ali Khwaja, Paul Engels, Emilie Joos, Kelly Vogt, Matt Strickland, Samuel Minor, Nori Bradley","doi":"10.1503/cjs.014923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma educational opportunities for general surgery residents in Canada are uncharacterized. We aimed to characterize these opportunities for and identify factors associated with such opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study characterizing trauma educational opportunities within Canadian trauma programs. Data were collected during 1 summer week and 1 winter week. We summarized educational opportunities by trauma site and season and used multivariable modelling to evaluate factors associated with increased likelihood of procedure opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine academic trauma centres participated. Most consults (93.9%) and trauma team activations (TTAs) (72.3%) were for blunt injuries, and most presentations were during the summer (67.2% TTAs + consults, 69.3% TTAs). Trauma services cared for a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 10-20) inpatients, 4 (IQR 1-6) patients in the intensive care unit, and 0 (IQR 0-2) patients admitted to another service but subsequently followed by a trauma physician (i.e., consulting patients), which varied across hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Consult, TTA, nonoperative, and operative procedure volumes varied across sites. The most common operative procedures were laparotomies (36.4%), with 1.33 laparotomies per week per site. For nonlaparotomy operations, the maximum volume was 6 over 2 weeks. More operations occurred during summer (74.2%) than winter. Multivariable modelling determined that penetrating mechanisms (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.15) and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.54) were associated with increased likelihood of procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trauma educational opportunities remain heterogeneous across Canada. Higher volumes of patients with trauma were seen during the summer. Penetrating mechanism and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present appear to increase opportunities to perform procedures. Our results can inform general surgery training programs to optimize resident trauma training in Canada.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 2","pages":"E97-E107"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trauma surgical educational opportunities in Canada: a week in the life of a trauma service.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Verhoeff, Logan Richard, Matt Guttman, Barbara Haas, Chad Ball, Nawaf Al Shahwan, Kosar Ali Khwaja, Paul Engels, Emilie Joos, Kelly Vogt, Matt Strickland, Samuel Minor, Nori Bradley\",\"doi\":\"10.1503/cjs.014923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trauma educational opportunities for general surgery residents in Canada are uncharacterized. We aimed to characterize these opportunities for and identify factors associated with such opportunities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective cross-sectional study characterizing trauma educational opportunities within Canadian trauma programs. Data were collected during 1 summer week and 1 winter week. We summarized educational opportunities by trauma site and season and used multivariable modelling to evaluate factors associated with increased likelihood of procedure opportunities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine academic trauma centres participated. Most consults (93.9%) and trauma team activations (TTAs) (72.3%) were for blunt injuries, and most presentations were during the summer (67.2% TTAs + consults, 69.3% TTAs). Trauma services cared for a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 10-20) inpatients, 4 (IQR 1-6) patients in the intensive care unit, and 0 (IQR 0-2) patients admitted to another service but subsequently followed by a trauma physician (i.e., consulting patients), which varied across hospitals (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Consult, TTA, nonoperative, and operative procedure volumes varied across sites. The most common operative procedures were laparotomies (36.4%), with 1.33 laparotomies per week per site. For nonlaparotomy operations, the maximum volume was 6 over 2 weeks. More operations occurred during summer (74.2%) than winter. Multivariable modelling determined that penetrating mechanisms (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.15) and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.54) were associated with increased likelihood of procedures.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Trauma educational opportunities remain heterogeneous across Canada. Higher volumes of patients with trauma were seen during the summer. Penetrating mechanism and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present appear to increase opportunities to perform procedures. Our results can inform general surgery training programs to optimize resident trauma training in Canada.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"E97-E107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11928075/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014923\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.014923","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加拿大普通外科住院医师的创伤教育机会尚不明确。我们的目标是描述这些机会,并确定与这些机会相关的因素。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性横断面研究,描述了加拿大创伤项目中的创伤教育机会。在1个夏季周和1个冬季周收集数据。我们总结了创伤部位和季节的教育机会,并使用多变量模型来评估与手术机会增加可能性相关的因素。结果:参与了9个创伤学术中心。大多数咨询(93.9%)和创伤小组激活(TTAs)(72.3%)是钝性损伤,大多数报告发生在夏季(67.2% TTAs +咨询,69.3% TTAs)。创伤服务的中位数为14(四分位数区间[IQR] 10-20)名住院患者,4 (IQR 1-6)名重症监护病房患者,0 (IQR 0-2)名住院但随后由创伤医生(即咨询患者)跟进的患者,各医院差异较大(p < 0.001)。咨询、TTA、非手术和手术的数量因部位而异。最常见的手术方式是剖腹手术(36.4%),每个部位每周进行1.33次剖腹手术。对于非开腹手术,2周内最大容积为6。夏季手术发生率高于冬季(74.2%)。多变量模型确定穿透机制(优势比[OR] 1.87, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.11-3.15)和有创伤外科医生在场的TTAs(优势比[OR] 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.54)与手术可能性增加相关。结论:创伤教育机会在加拿大各地仍然存在差异。夏季创伤患者数量较多。在创伤外科医生在场的情况下,穿透机制和TTAs似乎增加了实施手术的机会。我们的研究结果可以为加拿大普通外科培训计划提供参考,以优化住院医师创伤培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trauma surgical educational opportunities in Canada: a week in the life of a trauma service.

Background: Trauma educational opportunities for general surgery residents in Canada are uncharacterized. We aimed to characterize these opportunities for and identify factors associated with such opportunities.

Methods: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study characterizing trauma educational opportunities within Canadian trauma programs. Data were collected during 1 summer week and 1 winter week. We summarized educational opportunities by trauma site and season and used multivariable modelling to evaluate factors associated with increased likelihood of procedure opportunities.

Results: Nine academic trauma centres participated. Most consults (93.9%) and trauma team activations (TTAs) (72.3%) were for blunt injuries, and most presentations were during the summer (67.2% TTAs + consults, 69.3% TTAs). Trauma services cared for a median of 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 10-20) inpatients, 4 (IQR 1-6) patients in the intensive care unit, and 0 (IQR 0-2) patients admitted to another service but subsequently followed by a trauma physician (i.e., consulting patients), which varied across hospitals (p < 0.001). Consult, TTA, nonoperative, and operative procedure volumes varied across sites. The most common operative procedures were laparotomies (36.4%), with 1.33 laparotomies per week per site. For nonlaparotomy operations, the maximum volume was 6 over 2 weeks. More operations occurred during summer (74.2%) than winter. Multivariable modelling determined that penetrating mechanisms (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.15) and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present (OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.59-3.54) were associated with increased likelihood of procedures.

Conclusion: Trauma educational opportunities remain heterogeneous across Canada. Higher volumes of patients with trauma were seen during the summer. Penetrating mechanism and TTAs with a trauma surgeon present appear to increase opportunities to perform procedures. Our results can inform general surgery training programs to optimize resident trauma training in Canada.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信