Huimin Liu, Furong Kou, Li Hu, Jie Sun, Juan Zhang, Ye Xu, Lu Yao, Yuntao Xie
{"title":"新辅助化疗后可手术的BRCA1/2种系致病变异乳腺癌患者的潜在辅助奥拉帕尼治疗候选者。","authors":"Huimin Liu, Furong Kou, Li Hu, Jie Sun, Juan Zhang, Ye Xu, Lu Yao, Yuntao Xie","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07687-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative operable breast cancer (BC) patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants may benefit from adjuvant olaparib treatment. However, data about how many patients were eligible for olaparib treatment in operable BC patients with BRCA1/2 variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 341 operable BC with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who received NACT at our institute between October 2003 and May 2015 were included. Pathological complete response (pCR) and survival were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 341 BRCA1/2 carriers (BRCA1: 139; BRCA2: 202), 295 (88.1%) cases exhibited HER2-negative BC in the entire cohort. The most common subtype was triple-negative (TN) BC (62.0%) for BRCA1 carriers and hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative BC (68.2%) for BRCA2 carriers, respectively. The pCR rate were 39.6% for BRCA1 carriers and 28.2% for BRCA2 carries. The pCR rate in TNBC, HR-positive/HER2-negative BC, and HER2-positive BC were 45.0%, 22.3%, and 45.0% in the entire cohort, respectively. Of these HR-positive/HER2-negative BC patients, 16.0% had non-pCR and exhibited CPS+EG≥3. Overall, 31.9% of the HER2-negative BC cohort were potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib, with 44.0% for BRCA1 carriers and 22.9% for BRCA2 carriers. Furthermore, patients with non-pCR exhibited a worse survival regardless of TNBC and HR-positive/HER2-negative BC disease, especially for HR-positive/HER2-negative BC with CPS+EG≥3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately one-third of HER2-negative BC patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib treatment after NACT, with a higher proportion for BRCA1 carriers compared to BRCA2 carriers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib treatment in operable breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Liu, Furong Kou, Li Hu, Jie Sun, Juan Zhang, Ye Xu, Lu Yao, Yuntao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07687-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative operable breast cancer (BC) patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants may benefit from adjuvant olaparib treatment. However, data about how many patients were eligible for olaparib treatment in operable BC patients with BRCA1/2 variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 341 operable BC with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who received NACT at our institute between October 2003 and May 2015 were included. Pathological complete response (pCR) and survival were estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 341 BRCA1/2 carriers (BRCA1: 139; BRCA2: 202), 295 (88.1%) cases exhibited HER2-negative BC in the entire cohort. The most common subtype was triple-negative (TN) BC (62.0%) for BRCA1 carriers and hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative BC (68.2%) for BRCA2 carriers, respectively. The pCR rate were 39.6% for BRCA1 carriers and 28.2% for BRCA2 carries. The pCR rate in TNBC, HR-positive/HER2-negative BC, and HER2-positive BC were 45.0%, 22.3%, and 45.0% in the entire cohort, respectively. Of these HR-positive/HER2-negative BC patients, 16.0% had non-pCR and exhibited CPS+EG≥3. Overall, 31.9% of the HER2-negative BC cohort were potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib, with 44.0% for BRCA1 carriers and 22.9% for BRCA2 carriers. Furthermore, patients with non-pCR exhibited a worse survival regardless of TNBC and HR-positive/HER2-negative BC disease, especially for HR-positive/HER2-negative BC with CPS+EG≥3.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Approximately one-third of HER2-negative BC patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib treatment after NACT, with a higher proportion for BRCA1 carriers compared to BRCA2 carriers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07687-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07687-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib treatment in operable breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Background: Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative operable breast cancer (BC) patients with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants may benefit from adjuvant olaparib treatment. However, data about how many patients were eligible for olaparib treatment in operable BC patients with BRCA1/2 variants after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is lacking.
Methods: A total of 341 operable BC with germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants who received NACT at our institute between October 2003 and May 2015 were included. Pathological complete response (pCR) and survival were estimated.
Results: Of the 341 BRCA1/2 carriers (BRCA1: 139; BRCA2: 202), 295 (88.1%) cases exhibited HER2-negative BC in the entire cohort. The most common subtype was triple-negative (TN) BC (62.0%) for BRCA1 carriers and hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative BC (68.2%) for BRCA2 carriers, respectively. The pCR rate were 39.6% for BRCA1 carriers and 28.2% for BRCA2 carries. The pCR rate in TNBC, HR-positive/HER2-negative BC, and HER2-positive BC were 45.0%, 22.3%, and 45.0% in the entire cohort, respectively. Of these HR-positive/HER2-negative BC patients, 16.0% had non-pCR and exhibited CPS+EG≥3. Overall, 31.9% of the HER2-negative BC cohort were potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib, with 44.0% for BRCA1 carriers and 22.9% for BRCA2 carriers. Furthermore, patients with non-pCR exhibited a worse survival regardless of TNBC and HR-positive/HER2-negative BC disease, especially for HR-positive/HER2-negative BC with CPS+EG≥3.
Conclusion: Approximately one-third of HER2-negative BC patients with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants are potential candidates for adjuvant olaparib treatment after NACT, with a higher proportion for BRCA1 carriers compared to BRCA2 carriers.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.