健康的职场文化与公平的劳动力福利:一个范围的文献回顾。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rukshana Gupta, Emily Stiehl, Caroline Wator, Preethi Lakshmi Pratap, Bruce W Sherman
{"title":"健康的职场文化与公平的劳动力福利:一个范围的文献回顾。","authors":"Rukshana Gupta, Emily Stiehl, Caroline Wator, Preethi Lakshmi Pratap, Bruce W Sherman","doi":"10.1177/08901171251326316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the evidence base regarding employer-sponsored health and wellbeing (HWB) programs in relation to addressing workforce health inequities.Data SourceMultiple databases were systematically searched to identify research studies published between 2013 and 2022 regarding employer-sponsored HWB programs.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaResearchers included studies based on the following criteria: (1) described an employer-sponsored initiative to improve employee HWB; (2) included employees as the population of interest; (3) provided detail regarding participant demographics, and (4) included outcomes measures.Data ExtractionFour researchers screened the identified studies with abstraction conducted by a primary and secondary reviewer. Of the 3420 articles identified, 98 studies were eligible and abstracted.Data SynthesisData synthesis focused on research approach and design, as well as work setting, HWB program characteristics, and approach to inclusion of historically underrepresented or low-wage subpopulations.ResultsThe majority of studies highlighted programs focused on improving employee physical health (54) and/or mental health (24) or the workplace environment (27). Fourteen studies incorporated a randomized experimental design. Though nine studies intentionally recruited historically underrepresented populations and ten studies involved low-wage workers, none included race or ethnicity as independent variables. Various facilitators and barriers to employee participation were explored.ConclusionsDespite increasing employer focus on workforce HWB, few studies explored the program implications on historically underrepresented or low-wage populations or subpopulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251326316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Workplace Culture of Health and Equitable Workforce Well-Being: A Scoping Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Rukshana Gupta, Emily Stiehl, Caroline Wator, Preethi Lakshmi Pratap, Bruce W Sherman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251326316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the evidence base regarding employer-sponsored health and wellbeing (HWB) programs in relation to addressing workforce health inequities.Data SourceMultiple databases were systematically searched to identify research studies published between 2013 and 2022 regarding employer-sponsored HWB programs.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaResearchers included studies based on the following criteria: (1) described an employer-sponsored initiative to improve employee HWB; (2) included employees as the population of interest; (3) provided detail regarding participant demographics, and (4) included outcomes measures.Data ExtractionFour researchers screened the identified studies with abstraction conducted by a primary and secondary reviewer. Of the 3420 articles identified, 98 studies were eligible and abstracted.Data SynthesisData synthesis focused on research approach and design, as well as work setting, HWB program characteristics, and approach to inclusion of historically underrepresented or low-wage subpopulations.ResultsThe majority of studies highlighted programs focused on improving employee physical health (54) and/or mental health (24) or the workplace environment (27). Fourteen studies incorporated a randomized experimental design. Though nine studies intentionally recruited historically underrepresented populations and ten studies involved low-wage workers, none included race or ethnicity as independent variables. Various facilitators and barriers to employee participation were explored.ConclusionsDespite increasing employer focus on workforce HWB, few studies explored the program implications on historically underrepresented or low-wage populations or subpopulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251326316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251326316\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251326316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估雇主赞助的健康和福利(HWB)计划与解决劳动力健康不平等有关的证据基础。数据来源系统地检索了多个数据库,以确定2013年至2022年间发表的关于雇主赞助的HWB项目的研究。研究纳入和排除标准研究人员根据以下标准纳入研究:(1)描述了雇主赞助的改善员工工作满意度的举措;(2)将员工作为研究对象;(3)提供有关参与者人口统计的详细信息;(4)包括结果测量。数据提取:4名研究人员对已确定的研究进行了筛选,并由主要审稿人和次要审稿人进行了摘要。在确定的3420篇文章中,有98篇研究符合条件并被摘要。数据综合数据综合侧重于研究方法和设计,以及工作环境,HWB计划特征,以及纳入历史上代表性不足或低工资亚人群的方法。结果大多数研究都强调了改善员工身体健康(54)和/或心理健康(24)或工作环境(27)的项目。14项研究采用随机实验设计。虽然有9项研究有意招募了历史上代表性不足的人群,10项研究涉及低薪工人,但没有一项研究将种族或民族作为独立变量。探讨了员工参与的各种促进因素和障碍。尽管越来越多的雇主关注劳动力HWB,但很少有研究探讨该计划对历史上代表性不足或低工资人群或亚人群的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Workplace Culture of Health and Equitable Workforce Well-Being: A Scoping Literature Review.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the evidence base regarding employer-sponsored health and wellbeing (HWB) programs in relation to addressing workforce health inequities.Data SourceMultiple databases were systematically searched to identify research studies published between 2013 and 2022 regarding employer-sponsored HWB programs.Study Inclusion and Exclusion CriteriaResearchers included studies based on the following criteria: (1) described an employer-sponsored initiative to improve employee HWB; (2) included employees as the population of interest; (3) provided detail regarding participant demographics, and (4) included outcomes measures.Data ExtractionFour researchers screened the identified studies with abstraction conducted by a primary and secondary reviewer. Of the 3420 articles identified, 98 studies were eligible and abstracted.Data SynthesisData synthesis focused on research approach and design, as well as work setting, HWB program characteristics, and approach to inclusion of historically underrepresented or low-wage subpopulations.ResultsThe majority of studies highlighted programs focused on improving employee physical health (54) and/or mental health (24) or the workplace environment (27). Fourteen studies incorporated a randomized experimental design. Though nine studies intentionally recruited historically underrepresented populations and ten studies involved low-wage workers, none included race or ethnicity as independent variables. Various facilitators and barriers to employee participation were explored.ConclusionsDespite increasing employer focus on workforce HWB, few studies explored the program implications on historically underrepresented or low-wage populations or subpopulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信